Author Topic: Should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47  (Read 1949 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dutch508

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12523
  • Reputation: +1647/-1068
  • Remember
Should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47
« on: March 10, 2015, 10:37:45 AM »
Nothing says Totalitarianism like crushing your enemies with the power of the State.

Quote
DetlefK (4,126 posts) http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026341142

Can and should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47 for violating the Logan Act?
They would fundraise the hell out of it and bluster how Obama is a tyrant...

But when push comes to shove and once they have to appear in court...

Once they have to explain why they sent a diplomatic note to the iranian government, why they tried to influence ongoing negotiations between the US and Iran, why they did so in their official capacities as members of the legislative branch (using their titles and the official letterhead) ...



For serious? I wouldn't give a **** about how the GOP reacts:
1. The GOP is already bought and paid for by big donors. It won't have an effect on overall fundraising.
2. Public opinion is against them.
3. It would be really fun to watch Fox News trying to spin this how this law doesn't count when lawless Obama tries to enforce it.


I say you try it and see what happens.

Quote
Nuclear Unicorn (14,574 posts)
5. The only thing more impotent than a threat unmade is a threat unkept.

Maybe Barry can draw another red line.
The torch of moral clarity since 12/18/07

2016 DOTY: 06 Omaha Steve - Is dying for ****'s face! How could you not vote for him, you heartless bastards!?!

Offline FiddyBeowulf

  • "Its on, its off, its on, its off." "That is called blinking, boys."
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5271
  • Reputation: +523/-34
Re: Should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47
« Reply #1 on: March 10, 2015, 10:58:01 AM »
There are plenty examples of the left doing much worse but I will just show one example.

http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/27/ted-kennedy-soviet-union-ronald-reagan-opinions-columnists-peter-robinson.html
Quote
Ted Kennedy's Soviet Gambit

Picking his way through the Soviet archives that Boris Yeltsin had just thrown open, in 1991 Tim Sebastian, a reporter for the London Times, came across an arresting memorandum. Composed in 1983 by Victor Chebrikov, the top man at the KGB, the memorandum was addressed to Yuri Andropov, the top man in the entire USSR. The subject: Sen. Edward Kennedy.

“On 9-10 May of this year,” the May 14 memorandum explained, “Sen. Edward Kennedy’s close friend and trusted confidant [John] Tunney was in Moscow.” (Tunney was Kennedy’s law school roommate and a former Democratic senator from California.) “The senator charged Tunney to convey the following message, through confidential contacts, to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Y. Andropov.”

Kennedy’s message was simple. He proposed an unabashed quid pro quo. Kennedy would lend Andropov a hand in dealing with President Reagan. In return, the Soviet leader would lend the Democratic Party a hand in challenging Reagan in the 1984 presidential election.
I wish I could be shocked that a lefty would view Reagan as a greater threat to America than the USSR but I am not.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2015, 11:07:22 AM by FiddyBeowulf »
Fire...BAD!!! - John Fetterman


The policies that are indorsed by this party, that they backer of which are much of the 1 percent, causes a social structure much like the one back before the Revolution.

-Words of wisdom from Lady Freedom Returns

"Arguing with liberals...it's like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock over the pieces, crap on the board and strut around like it's victorious." -- Anonymous

"A hat should be taken off when you greet a lady and left off for the rest of your life. Nothing looks more stupid than a hat." - P. J. O'Rourke


Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1707/-151
Re: Should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47
« Reply #3 on: March 10, 2015, 12:06:36 PM »
A brief review of the act on-line indicates that aside from one indictment (Which was never further pursued) in 1803, nobody has ever been prosecuted under it.  Further, if the law actually withstood a First Amendment challenge, it applies to those who communicate with foreign governments "Without authority."  There is nothing in the first or second Articles of Constitution reserving such communications to the Executive Branch, nor forbidding them from the Legislative Branch.  Congress, in fact, has quite a few enumerated powers in the conduct of foreign relations, and no general limit from doing anything beyond those since almost the only truly exclusive power the Executive is given in Article II is that of Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces.

Bring it DUmmtards.  You won't like the result.
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline JohnnyReb

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32063
  • Reputation: +1997/-134
Re: Should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47
« Reply #4 on: March 10, 2015, 12:09:56 PM »
A brief review of the act on-line indicates that aside from one indictment (Which was never further pursued) in 1803, nobody has ever been prosecuted under it.  Further, if the law actually withstood a First Amendment challenge, it applies to those who communicate with foreign governments "Without authority."  There is nothing in the first or second Articles of Constitution reserving such communications to the Executive Branch, nor forbidding them from the Legislative Branch.  Congress, in fact, has quite a few enumerated powers in the conduct of foreign relations, and no general limit from doing anything beyond those since almost the only truly exclusive power the Executive is given in Article II is that of Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces.

Bring it DUmmtards.  You won't like the result.

YES....open that can of worms and we can all go fishing.
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."  Stalin

Offline txradioguy

  • Minister of Propaganda
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18686
  • Reputation: +1291/-1116
  • Rule 39
Re: Should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47
« Reply #5 on: March 10, 2015, 12:15:53 PM »








The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Creator of the largest Fight Club thread ever!

http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=83285.0

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58700
  • Reputation: +3073/-173
Re: Should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47
« Reply #6 on: March 10, 2015, 12:16:28 PM »
There are plenty examples of the left doing much worse but I will just show one example.

http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/27/ted-kennedy-soviet-union-ronald-reagan-opinions-columnists-peter-robinson.htmlI wish I could be shocked that a lefty would view Reagan as a greater threat to America than the USSR but I am not.

Thank you for bringing that one up.
apres moi, le deluge

Offline obumazombie

  • Siege engine to lib fortresses
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21814
  • Reputation: +1659/-578
  • Last of the great minorities
Re: Should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47
« Reply #7 on: March 10, 2015, 12:52:00 PM »
The community instigator strikes again.
There were only two options for gender. At last count there are at least 12, according to libs. By that standard, I'm a male lesbian.

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23049
  • Reputation: +2233/-269
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
Re: Should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47
« Reply #8 on: March 10, 2015, 02:07:00 PM »
Maybe Barry can draw another red line.

That half-wit can't even draw his own bath.
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."

Offline BlueStateSaint

  • Here I come to save the day, because I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32553
  • Reputation: +1560/-191
  • RIP FDNY Lt. Rich Nappi d. 4/16/12
Re: Should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47
« Reply #9 on: March 10, 2015, 02:52:08 PM »
I guess that, to the DUmp (and to the New York Daily News) that "dissent is patriotic" doesn't apply when there's a Dem in the White House, eh?
"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

"All you have to do is look straight and see the road, and when you see it, don't sit looking at it - walk!" -Ayn Rand
 
"Those that trust God with their safety must yet use proper means for their safety, otherwise they tempt Him, and do not trust Him.  God will provide, but so must we also." - Matthew Henry, Commentary on 2 Chronicles 32, from Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible

"These anti-gun fools are more dangerous to liberty than street criminals or foreign spies."--Theodore Haas, Dachau Survivor

Chase her.
Chase her even when she's yours.
That's the only way you'll be assured to never lose her.

Offline GOBUCKS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24186
  • Reputation: +1812/-338
  • All in all, not bad, not bad at all
Re: Should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47
« Reply #10 on: March 10, 2015, 02:57:30 PM »
Why investigate only 47?

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58700
  • Reputation: +3073/-173
Re: Should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47
« Reply #11 on: March 10, 2015, 04:01:54 PM »
Oh my.

Lookee here.

Quote
Senators John Sparkman (D-AL) and George McGovern (D-SD). The two Senators visited Cuba and met with government actors there in 1975. They said that they did not act on behalf of the United States, so the State Department ignored their activity.

Quote
Senator Teddy Kennedy (D-MA). In 1983, Teddy Kennedy sent emissaries to the Soviets to undermine Ronald Reagan’s foreign policy. According to a memo finally released in 1991 from head of the KGB Victor Chebrikov to then-Soviet leader Yuri Andropov:

On 9-10 May of this year, Sen. Edward Kennedy’s close friend and trusted confidant [John] Tunney was in Moscow. The senator charged Tunney to convey the following message, through confidential contacts, to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Y. Andropov.

What was the message? That Teddy would help stifle Reagan’s anti-Soviet foreign policy if the Soviets would help Teddy run against Reagan in 1984.

Quote
House Speaker Jim Wright (D-TX). In 1984, 10 Democrats sent a letter to Daniel Ortega Saavedra, the head of the military dictatorship in Nicaragua, praising Saavedra for “taking steps to open up the political process in your country.”

In 1987, Wright worked out a deal to bring Ortega to the United States to visit with lawmakers.....

Quote
Senator John Kerry (D-MA). Kerry jumped into the pro-Sandanista pool himself in 1985, when he traveled to Nicaragua to negotiate with the regime. He wasn’t alone; Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) joined him.

Quote
Representatives Jim McDermott (D-WA), David Bonior (D-MI), and Mike Thompson (D-CA). In 2002, the three Congressmen visited Baghdad to play defense for Saddam Hussein’s regime.

Quote
Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-WV). In 2002, Rockefeller told Fox News’ Chris Wallace, “I took a trip by myself in January of 2002 to Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Syria, and I told each of the heads of state that it was my view that George Bush had already made up his mind to go to war against Iraq, that that was a predetermined set course which had taken shape shortly after 9/11.”

Quote
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). In April 2007, as the Bush administration pursued pressure against Syrian dictator Bashar Assad, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi went to visit him. There, according to The New York Times, the two “discussed a variety of Middle Eastern issues, including the situations in Iraq and Lebanon and the prospect of peace talks between Syria and Israel.” Pelosi was accompanied by Reps. Henry Waxman (D-CA), Tom Lantos (D-CA), Louise M. Slaughter (D-NY), Nick J. Rahall II (D-WV), and Keith Ellison (D-MN). Zaid Haider, Damascus bureau chief for Al Safir, reportedly said, ‘There is a feeling now that change is going on in American policy – even if it’s being led by the opposition.”

More of the sordid details at:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/10/7-times-democrats-advised-americas-enemies-to-oppose-the-president/
apres moi, le deluge

Offline JohnnyReb

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32063
  • Reputation: +1997/-134
Re: Should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47
« Reply #12 on: March 10, 2015, 05:59:06 PM »
Oh my.

Lookee here.

More of the sordid details at:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/10/7-times-democrats-advised-americas-enemies-to-oppose-the-president/
Democrats, can't live with them but you could live damn good without them.
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."  Stalin

Offline Skul

  • Sometimes I drink water just to surprise my liver
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12475
  • Reputation: +914/-179
  • Chief of the cathouse
Re: Should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47
« Reply #13 on: March 10, 2015, 08:31:54 PM »
Quote from: [list
[li]GOBUCKS[/li]
[li][/li]
[/list] link=topic=101145.msg1272501#msg1272501 date=1426017450]
Why investigate only 47?


THAT's the image I was trying to remember.  :rotf:
« Last Edit: March 10, 2015, 11:35:07 PM by franksolich »
Then-Chief Justice John Marshall observed, “Between a balanced republic and a democracy, the difference is like that between order and chaos.”

John Adams warned in a letter, “Remember democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet, that did not commit suicide.”

Offline Movie buff- The Sequel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1529
  • Reputation: +192/-11
Re: Should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47
« Reply #14 on: March 10, 2015, 10:17:58 PM »
"Public opinion is against them."
If by "Them," you mean "Obama and his brainless liberal buddies, then yes.

Offline Delmar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5191
  • Reputation: +527/-40
Re: Should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47
« Reply #15 on: March 10, 2015, 11:14:02 PM »
Quote
Once they have to explain why they sent a diplomatic note to the iranian government, why they tried to influence ongoing negotiations between the US and Iran, why they did so in their official capacities as members of the legislative branch (using their titles and the official letterhead) ...

They have been caught red handed in their official capacities as members of the legislative branch, using their titles and the official letterhead.  The grownups had to step in because the manchild was screwing things up again.  I hope that the left keeps pushing this Logan Act nonsense.  Obama is a fool and it is about time the adults put him on a short leash.
"I sat down, and I said, 'America's back' and Mitterrand from Germany — I mean from France — looked at me and said … "Well, how long are you back for?"
Crooked Joe Biden

Offline Ptarmigan

  • Bunny Slayer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23676
  • Reputation: +932/-225
  • God Hates Bunnies
Re: Should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47
« Reply #16 on: March 10, 2015, 11:32:48 PM »
A brief review of the act on-line indicates that aside from one indictment (Which was never further pursued) in 1803, nobody has ever been prosecuted under it.  Further, if the law actually withstood a First Amendment challenge, it applies to those who communicate with foreign governments "Without authority."  There is nothing in the first or second Articles of Constitution reserving such communications to the Executive Branch, nor forbidding them from the Legislative Branch.  Congress, in fact, has quite a few enumerated powers in the conduct of foreign relations, and no general limit from doing anything beyond those since almost the only truly exclusive power the Executive is given in Article II is that of Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces.

Bring it DUmmtards.  You won't like the result.

Let them bring it.
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.
-Napoleon Bonaparte

Allow enemies their space to hate; they will destroy themselves in the process.
-Lisa Du

Offline obumazombie

  • Siege engine to lib fortresses
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21814
  • Reputation: +1659/-578
  • Last of the great minorities
Re: Should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47
« Reply #17 on: March 11, 2015, 12:30:12 AM »
Quote
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). In April 2007, as the Bush administration pursued pressure against Syrian dictator Bashar Assad, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi went to visit him. There, according to The New York Times, the two “discussed a variety of Middle Eastern issues, including the situations in Iraq and Lebanon and the prospect of peace talks between Syria and Israel.” Pelosi was accompanied by Reps. Henry Waxman (D-CA), Tom Lantos (D-CA), Louise M. Slaughter (D-NY), Nick J. Rahall II (D-WV), and Keith Ellison (D-MN). Zaid Haider, Damascus bureau chief for Al Safir, reportedly said, ‘There is a feeling now that change is going on in American policy – even if it’s being led by the opposition.”

When "Bela" Pelosi went to Syria to commit treason, she was praised by Hitlery.
Now the shoe is on the other foot...

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeffrey-meyer/2015/03/10/cbs-channels-opponents-gop-letter-iran-highlights-traitors-headline

When libs do it they give aid and comfort to our mortal enemies.
When conservatives do it, they warn our mortal enemies against opposing the best interests of America.


There were only two options for gender. At last count there are at least 12, according to libs. By that standard, I'm a male lesbian.

Offline HawkHogan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1160
  • Reputation: +101/-24
Re: Should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47
« Reply #18 on: March 11, 2015, 01:20:26 AM »
Nothing better than Dummies calling a war hero like Tom Cotton a traitor.
They have a petition signed by 100,000 Dummies and other liberals, requesting all 47 to be tried as traitors.

Also, didn't Kerry meet with North Vietnamese during the Vietnam War?
« Last Edit: March 11, 2015, 12:12:55 PM by HawkHogan »

Offline txradioguy

  • Minister of Propaganda
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18686
  • Reputation: +1291/-1116
  • Rule 39
Re: Should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47
« Reply #19 on: March 11, 2015, 05:55:06 AM »
So let me see if I get this right...to a Progressive...47 Senators reminding a head of state who is doing a back channel deal with the POTUS that they have Constitutional authority to approve any deals = Treason.

But Bowe Berghdal = Hero???
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Creator of the largest Fight Club thread ever!

http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=83285.0

Offline Mr Mannn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14885
  • Reputation: +2646/-276
Re: Should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47
« Reply #20 on: March 11, 2015, 07:01:11 AM »
These men were elected to stop the first dictator of the United States. they are patriots.
Obama and his minions may be hopping mad, but there is nothing they can do about it.

Offline HawkHogan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1160
  • Reputation: +101/-24
Re: Should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47
« Reply #21 on: March 11, 2015, 12:33:14 PM »
These men were elected to stop the first dictator of the United States. they are patriots.
Obama and his minions may be hopping mad, but there is nothing they can do about it.

Dummies really think that the President can do whatever the hell he wants.

Offline JohnnyReb

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32063
  • Reputation: +1997/-134
Re: Should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47
« Reply #22 on: March 11, 2015, 01:35:36 PM »
Dummies really think that the President can do whatever the hell he wants.
Well, don't he?
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."  Stalin

Offline DLR Pyro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9234
  • Reputation: +1418/-29
Re: Should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47
« Reply #23 on: March 11, 2015, 01:56:24 PM »
Dummies really think that the President can do whatever the hell he wants.
well at least since January 20, 2009. Prior to that date, not so much...
Biden is an illegitimate President.  Change my mind.

Police lives matter.

Basking in the glow of my white privilege

ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Wed Mar-09-11 08:50 PM
64.I'd almost be willing to get a job in order to participate in
A NATIONAL GENERAL STRIKE
  https://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4763020

Offline obumazombie

  • Siege engine to lib fortresses
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21814
  • Reputation: +1659/-578
  • Last of the great minorities
Re: Should the DoJ investigate the infamous 47
« Reply #24 on: March 11, 2015, 03:30:56 PM »
After it turns out that the "47" were patriots for their actions, and Pelosi, Kerry, Kennedy, et al were treasonous, the owebumaManiaMedia has set off in a new direction...

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/ken-shepherd/2015/03/10/was-just-matter-time-chris-matthews-hints-47-gop-senators-motivated

They are racist !
There were only two options for gender. At last count there are at least 12, according to libs. By that standard, I'm a male lesbian.