Author Topic: I need debunking here, please, of RW propaganda.  (Read 1628 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lord Undies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11388
  • Reputation: +639/-250
I need debunking here, please, of RW propaganda.
« on: July 15, 2008, 09:30:55 PM »
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3625522

Quote
steve2470  (1000+ posts)        Tue Jul-15-08 10:14 PM
Original message
I need debunking here, please, of RW propaganda....

*snip*
Then there are the “right wing critics” who question his insanely convoluted answer to the question “why don’t you wear a flag pin?”; that his wife said she wasn’t proud of her country until it became obvious that her husband had a good shot at the White House; that he’s had a close relationship with Bill Ayers, an unrepentant domestic terrorist. Okay, fine those were the work of “right wing critics” — and they had some legitimate concerns on those counts.
*snip*

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NWY3MmEyNzcyNWQ1OT...

The terrorist thing is total BS, correct ? And this article distorts Ms. Obama, correct ? Hopefully the Obama campaign is addressing this stuff too.

Quote
Warpy  (1000+ posts)         Tue Jul-15-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. First, Google Bill Ayers, find out who he is
   and who he's become in the 35 years since his "terrorist" days.

Second, Google Mrs. Obama's entire statement, context and all. It's not hard to find.

That's the way you counter "right wing critics" being parroted by somebody else who is too lazy to do his/her own research.

IOW, Warpy isn't going to be risking any tombstones by helping you out here, sparky

Quote
babylonsister  (1000+ posts)         Tue Jul-15-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm done googling for others tonight, but look forward to responses. nt

babylonsister isn't gonna be the bearer of truth either.  Too risky.

Quote
steve2470  (1000+ posts)        Tue Jul-15-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. research
   video of Michelle Obama:
http://www.breitbart.tv/html/49244.html

Bill Ayers:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Ayers

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/17/us/politics/17truth.h...

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/02/oba...

Sparky found himself some liberal links to poison his mind.

Quote
AZDemDist6  (1000+ posts)         Tue Jul-15-08 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obama has a 'stop the smear' page here
   Edited on Tue Jul-15-08 10:23 PM by AZDemDist6
www.fightthesmears.com

bookmark it


Still no information - just outside links to dubious unsubstaniated liberal bullshit.

Quote
DinahMoeHum  (1000+ posts)        Tue Jul-15-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Two more allies for you: FightTheSmears and Snopes
   http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/fightthesmearsho...

http://search.atomz.com/search/?sp-q=barack+Obama&getit...


Good luck and happy debunking.

It's a frickin' conspiracy of silence.

Quote
liberalmuse  (1000+ posts)        Tue Jul-15-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, you've just about got step 1 down pat.
   Edited on Tue Jul-15-08 10:29 PM by liberalmuse
That is, assuming whenever someone claiming to be from the right wing opens their mouth, that lies will spill forth. Step 2 is just a matter of finding the truth to counter all their bullshit with, which is easily found with a good search engine, which someone else has already suggested. Step 3 is being so armed with the facts that they aren't able to argue anymore so they start sulking in silence. These days I just go to Step 3 and shut the ****ers down before they can even start spilling their Fox-news-collected garbage. I did that today, when a 'pub was trying to tell me that the reason the economy is so bad right now is because of the terrorist attack back in 2001. Riiiiight.

Riiiight.  Still no answers.  Just dreams and delusions.

No one wants to risk being banned for answering the plea for help.  I wonder why that is.




Offline jukin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16213
  • Reputation: +2100/-170
Re: I need debunking here, please, of RW propaganda.
« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2008, 09:36:33 PM »
Jukin has still never lost an argument with a liberal.  In fact, it is they that leave spitting mad.
When you are the beneficiary of someone’s kindness and generosity, it produces a sense of gratitude and community.

When you are the beneficiary of a policy that steals from someone and gives it to you in return for your vote, it produces a sense of entitlement and dependency.

Offline Schadenfreude

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8388
  • Reputation: +475/-78
Re: I need debunking here, please, of RW propaganda.
« Reply #2 on: July 15, 2008, 09:54:09 PM »
I think debunking is "code" for sump'n else.  :evillaugh:
“Imperfection is beauty, madness is genius and it's better to be absolutely ridiculous than absolutely boring.â€

Offline Rebel

  • MAGA
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16934
  • Reputation: +1384/-215
Re: I need debunking here, please, of RW propaganda.
« Reply #3 on: July 15, 2008, 09:54:39 PM »
Quote
Warpy  (1000+ posts)         Tue Jul-15-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. First, Google Bill Ayers, find out who he is and who he's become in the 35 years since his "terrorist" days.

That's the way you counter "right wing critics" being parroted by somebody else who is too lazy to do his/her own research.

Sorry moonbat, he STILL isn't disassociating himself from it. From your fellow moonbat's link:

Quote
In the months before Ayers' memoir was published on September 10, 2001, the author gave numerous interviews with newspaper and magazine writers in which he defended his overall history of radical words and actions. Some of the resulting articles were written just before the September 11 terrorist attacks and appeared immediately after, including one often-noted article in The New York Times, and another in the Chicago Tribune. Numerous observations were made in the media comparing the statements Ayers was making about his own past just as a dramatic new terrorist incident shocked the public.

"We weren't terrorists," Ayers told an interviewer for the Chicago Tribune in 2001. "The reason we weren't terrorists is because we did not commit random acts of terror against people. Terrorism was what was being practiced in the countryside of Vietnam by the United States.


Damn you idiots are stupid.  :whatever:
NAMBLA is a left-wing organization.

Quote
There's a reason why patriotism is considered a conservative value. Watch a Tea Party rally and you'll see people proudly raising the American flag and showing pride in U.S. heroes such as Thomas Jefferson. Watch an OWS rally and you'll see people burning the American flag while showing pride in communist heroes such as Che Guevera. --Bob, from some news site