Welcome to The Conservative Cave©!Join in the discussion! Click HERE to register.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Kurska (4,413 posts) Fri Aug 15, 2014, 06:45 AMThe woman who thinks reducing the male population by 90% will solve everything.The Femitheist is a 22-year-old criminology student with a three-year-old. One angry day in 2012 she took to the Internet to outline the brutal concept of International Castration Day. After posting it on YouTube she stepped out for a coffee. Returning home a few hours later, she found that all gnashing male hell had broken loose. While she now derides International Castration day as silly, the internet had met The Femitheist. Two years later she is an emergent cult leader, a ball-stepping villainess, or clear-thinking realist—depending who you ask. Today she continues to support the reduction of the male population and generally courts outrage and devotion through her website and YouTube channel. She’s also 200 pages into what she’s hoping will be her 700 page manifesto outlining the philosophy of Femitheism. It’s tentatively titled The Ratio. VICE: I assume The Ratio refers to your belief the male population should be reduced to between by 90 percent.The Femitheist: I believe that conventional equality, with a 50/50 female-to-male ratio, is an inferior system. Essentially my ideas lead to men being made a special class—a far more valued class—having choice of a myriad of women due to the difference in sex ratio. That is my intention. Men would be made more valuable, and their quality of life would be dramatically improved. They would have a subsidised existence if you will, akin to going on an all-expenses paid vacation that lasts from birth to death. [VICE:] Assuming people are down for that, how could you reduce the male population by that much? Are you talking culling or selective breeding over years?[The Femitheist:] Obviously men comprise a substantial portion of the victims of violent crime and participate heavily in war, so there will always be deaths there—but certainly not culling. I don't advocate selective slaughter or brutal processes. Sic.... What about the ambitions of the individual? Some men may aspire to more than luxury breeding pens.: Some would argue it would be a dystopian world because it wouldn't be free in the present conventional sense. However that is misguided. It will be utopian because it will be a world almost without conflict where people cooperate and are treated properly within a well-engineered and long-forged system. If everything is great for almost everyone the point is null. Survival and socio-organic wellbeing are the most important elements in life. Diversity of principles and standards is only necessary in a world of multiple nations, cultures, societies, and religions due to fear of oppression. So, how is this world any better? Because some people have potential opportunities to do certain things? http://www.vice.com/read/is-reducing-the-male-population-by-90-percent-the-solution-to-all-our-problems And before anyone says anything, no one is claiming this woman is representative of all feminists*, she doesn't even claim to be feminist but her own "special" kind of thing. That said, I find it especially disturbing how she seems to be able to openly call for what amounts to a genocide of gay men. They obviously wouldn't have any place in her "utopia" where men are literally just breeding stock. So I find her claims she isn't calling for a genocide highly dubious. Her being a criminology major disturbs me, would you really trust her to give any man a fair shake in a legal situation? This has to be my "favorite" quote Vice: Like slaves? [The Femitheist:] Not as slaves, simply as workers performing a duty, in the same way workers today do. Only without the need for monetary reimbursement as they would have no need for such a thing. This would be highly monitored and regulated." So... slaves.
CBGLuthier (10,502 posts) Fri Aug 15, 2014, 06:57 AM5. Men may have the corner on violence but she is an argument that women have it on insanity.Not really of course since the whole human race is ****ing insane but if she can spout bullshit so can I.
DetlefK (2,969 posts) Fri Aug 15, 2014, 07:05 AM6. Oh, brave new world.Who needs freedom when you can have all the sex you want? And the thoughts, that a man might prefer to have an exclusive relationship with a particular woman, or that a woman might prefer to have an exclusive relationship with her breeding-bull, are laughable. It would be an utopia. * no gay men * no committed male-female-relationships * picking the breeding-bulls, erm... men, with abortion and/or selective in-vitro-fertilization and/or a series of life-or-death duels and euthanasia* Men would be judged solely on their value as flesh. "What's beyond the compound?" "Don't worry your pretty huge dick off about that."
You know, there are times when the Muslim treatment of women don't look so bad....like right after reading this.
