http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022824583
Fri May 10, 2013, 10:26 AM
newmember (289 posts)
Female jogger 'mauled to death' by four pit bulls in Los Angeles
A female jogger has died after being attacked by four pit bulls in Los Angeles.
The 62-year-old woman, who has not been identified, died from her wounds on the way to hospital.
Authorities are warning people in Littlerock, about 40 miles (65km) northeast of the city of Los Angeles to be on the lookout for four pit bulls - they have seized several dogs in a search for those who may have taken part in the attack
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2322520/Female-jogger-mauled-death-pit-bulls-Los-Angeles.html#ixzz2Str5ANur
Ok, interesting and horrifying. But wait, there's more! How could the above article left out this little tidbit of info?
Cirque du So-What (8,732 posts)
1. The following article is a bit more up-to-date
and doesn't involve a link to the execrable Daily Mail:
Man, 29, Arrested In Connection With Case Of Fatal Pit Bull Mauling
May 9, 2013 8:50 PM
LITTLEROCK (CBLS.com) — A 29-year-old Littlerock man has been arrested for allegedly running a marijuana “grow†operation on his property where he had several pit bulls that may have been involved in the fatal mauling Thursday of a female jogger.
The unidentified victim was reportedly a 63-year-old Littlerock woman.
The mauling — by as many as four different pit bulls — occurred Thursday morning around 9:30 a.m. at 116th Street East and Avenue S, Littlerock, said officials.
Authorities announced the arrest of the 29-year-old man — who allegedly owned eight dogs in all, six pits and two mixed breeds — Thursday evening.
http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2013/05/09/man-29-arrested-in-connection-with-case-of-fatal-pit-bull-mauling/
Now you know the DUmmies are going to be all over the bolded part right? Nope, they pretend that part doesn't exist ...
newmember (289 posts)
2. Thanks
What a painful way to die for this woman, I hope they throw the book at this guy
Why? It's not the guys fault, it's the dogs (guns) fault. I don't know why they can't see how well this fits in with the gun debate but ... whatever.
Star Member PeaceNikki (19,052 posts)
4. So who's more dangerous, dogs trained to do harm just to please his/her human
or the piece of shit who trained the dogs to be aggressive?
If pit bulls were gone, they'd train Rottweilers. Or German Shepherds. Or Bull Mastiffs. Or Dobermans.
cigsandcoffee (1,953 posts)
6. So dog violence is just a fact of life, then?
I don't accept that. Placing heavy restrictions on dangerous animals could only cut down the danger they present to society. If that has to included other large breeds of dogs, then so be it.
PeaceNikki (19,052 posts)
8. Can you provide any evidence that BSL works?
Because there is a ton of data to show it doesn't.
What? You're saying restrictions on stuff doesn't matter?? How come this is about the dogs and not the evil marijuana grower?! I thought those guys were all peace lovers who wouldn't hurt anyone. Y'all taught me that there is nothing bad about 'herb'. Right?
flamingdem (22,592 posts)
5. This guy is 100% responsible for her death
I hope they give him more than the maximum for his disregard for life
Again it's the guys fault. I don't get it. Dogs have minds of their own, a gun will just lie on a table if left alone.
Bluenorthwest (23,956 posts)
9. Littlerock is a 65 mile drive from downtown LA and is in fact a 'census desigated place'
in rural Los Angeles County, the population about 1500 people. To say this happened 'in Los Angeles' is just not accurate. Takes over an hour to drive from LA to Littlerock.
LOL! This DUmmie wants to show of its knowledge of LA. There is no other point to the post.
There's more over there but it is typical DUmmie attitude. Ban this and restrict that. THEY claim it is conservatives who want to take away your freedoms but all anyone needs to do is spend 5 minutes at that cesspool and you'll learn VERY quickly who is trying to take away your rights/freedoms.
KC
