cousin nadin pays attention

[franksolich]

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022589221

Oh my.

nadinbrzezinski (117,866 posts)    Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:01 PM

Oh my, time to pay attention...MSNBC is leading

With Korean news...

It is US media after all.

zappaman (7,747 posts)    Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:03 PM

1. OMIGOD!

MSNBC has NEVER led with international news!!!!!

This must be hugh!

cali (78,236 posts)       Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:05 PM

2. panting for disaster. disaster junkies in paradise.

SidDithers (25,964 posts)    Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:12 PM

4. I wonder what the over / under is in Vegas on NK threads started by this OP...

we're up to 5 since Thursday.

SidDithers (25,964 posts)    Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:06 PM

3. "This looks like war is pretty much imminent."...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=42198&mesg_id=42325

GP6971 (517 posts)    Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:15 PM

5. I'll have to check the Korean channels we subscribe to when I get home. Yesterday, they were bemoaning the fall in tourism

nadinbrzezinski (117,866 posts)    Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:23 PM

6. That should be a good place

[Carl]

What does it tell you DUmbasses when a lunatic like her has a home and a following at you site?

[franksolich]

What does it tell you DUmbasses when a lunatic like her has a home and a following at you site?

You know, I have no idea the real standing of my cousin nadin's critics on Skins's island; how they rate with the other primitives, and with my fellow alum Skins.  They might, or might not, be playing a dangerous game here, twitting cousin nadin like that.

However, I have a very good idea the real standing of the bitter old Vermontese cali primitive, and if she's not on cousin nadin's side, well, the oblate spheroid might as well start packing up her stuff.

[Carl]

You know, I have no idea the real standing of my cousin nadin's critics on Skins's island; how they rate with the other primitives, and with my fellow alum Skins.  They might, or might not, be playing a dangerous game here, twitting cousin nadin like that.

However, I have a very good idea the real standing of the bitter old Vermontese cali primitive, and if she's not on cousin nadin's side, well, the oblate spheroid might as well start packing up her stuff.

What I sense as I mole around the DUmp is that nads has her hecklers who know what a useless and annoying thing she is but many fall into that special breed of lemming that feels no matter how crazy if it is considered on our side we need to support it.

[franksolich]

Oh geezuz.

sad-cafe (568 posts)    Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:27 PM

7. what no nooz?

in response to SidDithers above

I'm hanging off the edge of my seat

Brother Buzz (8,070 posts)    Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:28 PM

8. Must be infuriating for the OP to not be able to jump into the other threads of substance because she has all the posters on her 'Iggy' list

JHB (17,556 posts)   Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:36 PM

in response to SidDithers' comment above, about war being imminent

14. Irwin Allen News syndrome

Or has that reference gotten too dated?

SidDithers (25,968 posts)    Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:40 PM

15. I had to look it up...

But I think it's entirely appropriate.

MineralMan (51,967 posts)   Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:30 PM

9. I'd reply to this thread, but the OP has me on Ignore.

So, never mind...

cali (78,240 posts)    Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:32 PM

11. longest ignore list on DU, I'm sure

some people carry their dislike of opposing opinions to the extreme.

MineralMan (51,967 posts)    Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:40 PM

16. Well, sometimes she errs and replies to someone she has said is on her "iggy" list. So, who knows how many names are actually on it and how many she has only said are on it? It's easy to forget names.

L0oniX (16,383 posts)    Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:44 PM

17. Ignore ...doesn't work on some with special powers.

spanone (71,329 posts)   Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:31 PM

10. our dramamedia loves the possibility of war...they will exploit this for all it's worth

Brickbat (13,950 posts)    Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:35 PM

13. So do many members here.

Anything to start multiples threads on the same topic, and condescend to the rest of us.

cali (78,240 posts)    Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:47 PM

19. yep, yep, yep. nail meet hammer.

nadinbrzezinski (117,869 posts)

in response to spanone, a little bit above

18. That is why they are late to the party

By forty eight hours

senseandsensibility (11,482 posts)    Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:34 PM

12. I watch a Korean channel because I love their dramas

They're great, with English subtitles. They regularly pre-empt my dramas for stories of national importance, such as the inauguration of their first female president a few weeks ago. Nothing's been pre-empted yet.

nadinbrzezinski (117,869 posts)    Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:48 PM

20. Well, the US media usually goes to

Scary music WAR...they are late by forty eight hours.

It's like everybody is going, that face is kind of bluish...should we pay attention to the tanter tantrum?

"tanter tantrum" =  

[EagleKeeper]

I couldn't help but notice that a primitive named longship seems to have taught Nads a new word.

nucleotides

I suppose it is supposed to be something that one can measure in order finger print the weapon type or something.

I think it was this post...

longship (16,810 posts)
Response to Poll_Blind (Reply #31)Sat Mar 30, 2013, 01:39 AM
38. Read your citation.

Low yield. No nucleotides. Therefore, no nuke detonation.

Unless you believe Russia's outlier estimates.

The DPRK doesn't know how to construct an initiator. That's why their nuclear bombs always fizzle. The assembly blows itself apart before a chain reaction gets going.

They get a few KTons, but mostly it's conventional explosives and the nuke assembly blowing itself apart. If it chain reacted, there would be an unmistakable, unambiguous signature. That's not what I am reading at the link you supplied.

Remember, this really is nuclear physics. A nuclear bomb has unmistakable characteristics, only it seems that the DPRK's tests do not satisfy those criteria.

If they had achieved a nuclear blast there would be universal agreement that they did.

I trust the consensus that the data is muddy; the yields are very low; there is no evidence of nuclear daughter products.

The DPRK may have a dirty bomb, but they have no nuclear weapon.
QED.

You supplied the link. Read it yourself.
Thanks.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022587385

I don't think it means what they think it means.

Anyway she is now starting to use the term in at least one other thread since then.

nadinbrzezinski (117,876 posts)
Response to Poll_Blind (Reply #7)Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:53 AM

10. Oh that question will be answered with 72 hours

Yes, we can tell where nucleotides came from. The question is, will they tell us.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022587675

Or it could be the other way around, maybe Nads taught longship a new word.

But I still don't think it means what they think it means.

On Edit: I forgot to mention that longship has a BS in physics..sooo..maybe I'm completely off base.

longship (16,810 posts)
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #22)Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:41 AM
 
25. I just don't think the DPRK has the know how.

Last edited Sat Mar 30, 2013, 12:47 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

Their tests, as far as the publicly released info is concerned, tells a different story.

I am no expert, but I did graduate with a BS in physics and have had some minor experience in these matters. AFAIK, what the DPRK has exploded underground were no nuclear detonations. At least no full blown ones.

I remember the atomic cannon -- I was born in the forties. There's no way the DPRK has a weaponized nuke deliverable via such a method. They haven't even demonstrated a sustained chain reaction in any of their tests, certainly not the last one. I suspect highly that they may have a dirty bomb, which is enough to worry about as it is.

I may be wrong, Nadine. But I don't think they've solved the initiator problem. That's why their tests do not seem to have the nuke explosion signature, at least not a definitive one. The assembly blows itself apart before the chain reaction gets going. No neutrons at the precise time? No chain reaction.

Plus, remember, an underground test bomb is not likely weaponized, especially considering the very few tests they've done. Exploding it underground is not the same as putting it on a missile or an artillery shell where G-forces of the acceleration have to not tear the bomb mechanism apart.

I think the people at Langley probably know what's really going on. I have some opinions, but I can only babble on in my ignorance here. One hopes they know more than I do. 

 always good to read your posts.

on edit: none of their tests approached the power of the Hiroshima bomb. The last rest was about 1/3, at about 6 KTons, arguably a conventional explosion.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022587385

[Revolution]

This woman should be a method of torture. For crying out loud, she's insufferable!!

[USA4ME]

Nads doesn't have a star so I think her iggy list can only be 5 names long.

.

[Skul]

I couldn't help but notice that a primitive named longship seems to have taught Nads a new word.

nucleotides

I suppose it is supposed to be something that one can measure in order finger print the weapon type or something.

I think it was this post...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022587385

I don't think it means what they think it means.

Anyway she is now starting to use the term in at least one other thread since then.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022587675

Or it could be the other way around, maybe Nads taught longship a new word.

But I still don't think it means what they think it means.

On Edit: I forgot to mention that longship has a BS in physics..sooo..maybe I'm completely off base.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022587385

You would be right. 

[Ballygrl]

zappaman (7,759 posts)
1. OMIGOD!

MSNBC has NEVER led with international news!!!!!

This must be hugh!

Star Member sabrina 1 (32,896 posts)
44. Did the OP say that MSNBC never led with 'International News' before? I reread

it but don't see it. Did you have a point to make?

Oh hush, and get a sense of humor!

[GOBUCKS]

DUmmy sabrinanumber is a huge fan of the crazy bald dwarf. She hangs on every condescending, arrogant, comical misstatement, and looks to her for advice in times of nadin-declared peril.

So you may think that nadin is the constant center of her attention.

But as nadin once said, Au cntrainere!

It's us!

Sat Mar 30, 2013, 07:15 PM
sabrina 1 (32,901 posts)

50. That is so clever. You said 'nooz'!!! Just like the cave, they really are clever
don't you think? 'nooz' and they have a few other little phrases they use to mock the OP. They really hate Liberal Women, those cavers. Makes me proud to be one, like the OP.

Response to sabrina 1 (Reply #50)
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 07:35 PM
pintobean (8,627 posts)

60. I see you're still obsessed with cc
and the lame attempts at trying to tie good DUers to that hatefest. Nadin uses the term "nooz" all the time. I doesn't look like she has a problem with others using it too. If she did, she'd stop using it herself.

Hatefest? Compared to the DUmp, we're a Billy Graham Crusade.

Oh, wait, DUmpmonkeys think a Billy Graham Crusade IS a hatefest.

[GOBUCKS]

The battle goes on between Z and the nadin brigade:

Response to sabrina 1 (Reply #50)
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 08:11 PM
zappaman (7,769 posts)

65. Wow!

Still hung up on "the cave", eh?

They MUST be talking about this thread!
How else would you have found this!

Response to zappaman (Reply #65)
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 08:44 PM
sabrina 1 (32,908 posts)

73. I'm not the one imitating them, am I? Same MO, same insults, same
lame attacks. I haven't been to that vile corner of the internet for a year, it doesn't take long to see the patterns. A couple of weeks and it was obvious who was who, here and there. It must take a lot of time spent there to end up sounding and looking just like them, with the same obsessions, the same language even.
 
I'd suggest you not go there anymore, or at least don't imitate them.

Response to sabrina 1 (Reply #73)
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 08:59 PM
zappaman (7,769 posts)

81. You sound like you're jealous of all the attention she gets
Does the cave not give you any?
Perhaps you can be a tad more condescending and make up stories about your adventures to get them to take notice?

Response to sabrina 1 (Reply #50)
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 08:30 PM
tammywammy (18,234 posts)

69. Nadin says "nooz" all the time.

Response to tammywammy (Reply #69)
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 08:41 PM
sabrina 1 (32,908 posts)

72. Yes, and then a bunch of middle aged men on a stupid right wing site and here
use that to mock her with. Is there a good reason for anyone to mock someone else? Can these old men who have followed her around for years, not control their obsession with her and just leave her alone? She doesn't bother them. They follow her around, they've done it for years. That is sick, imho. Any old man who follows a woman around for years, mocking her, has a serious problem.
 
This problem was raised many times here, yet the same people are still unable to just pass her OPs by. Why?
 
If you saw a bunch of middle-aged men mocking and taunting a woman who was not bothering them on the street, what would you do? I know what I would do, I would call the cops.

I wish you old men would stop mocking the crazy bald dwarf.

She is the world's foremost auithority, and deserves to be treated with awe.