The Eternal Darkness of the Confused DUmmie Mind

[FlippyDoo]

The fictional spirit-guide thought of the week.

How stupid do you have to be to be a DUmmie?

The DUmmies hate and mistrust the military. The DUmmies hate and mistrust the police. These are two things that are fairly constant.

Then there are the bad guys.

The relationship between bad guys and DUmmies is kind of strange. The Dummies love the bad guys as long as the bad guys are harming anyone but the DUmmies. If a bad guy robs, harms or kills a good and decent person the DUmmies will generally defend and make excuses for the bad guy. Only when the bad guy robs, harms or kills a DUmmie or one of the DUmmies' gods does the DUmmie opinion of that particular bad guy change.

On the other hand, the bad guys' view of the DUmmies is simple. Both the political bad guys and the street level bad guys view the DUmmies as useful idiots. They have no love toward the DUmmies. If a bad guy thinks it's to his advantage to pat a DUmmie on the back he will pat a DUmmie on the back. If a bad guy thinks it is to his advantage to slap the taste out of a DUmmie's mouth he'll slap the taste out of a DUmmie's mouth. The bad guys do not view the DUmmies as equals or friends. They don't even view the DUmmies as human beings. They just view the DUmmies as disposable tools to be used and then tossed away.

The DUmmies want private ownership of guns banned. If they were to get their wish that would mean that the only ones who had guns would be the military (who they hate and mistrust), the police (who they hate and mistrust), and bad guys.

Regardless of what DUmmies think, bad guys will always have guns despite what the laws say. One of the reasons that bad guys are called bad guys is because they do NOT follow the laws.

Also regardless of what DUmmies think, rape whistles and vomit (even projectile vomit) iare not much protection against a bad guy with a gun, but being armed with a gun does provide some protection because bad guys like targets who can't shoot back.

With their stance on guns the DUmmies are essentially telling the military and police, "we hate you and mistrust you, but we want to remove our RIGHT to protect ourselves and remove the RIGHT of good and decent people to protect us and themselves and place all of our lives in your war-crime-committing, goose-stepping, distrustful hands." How sweet and thoughtful. How insightful. How intelligent. How enlightened.

It's like they are trying to work the Chewbacca defense or something. It does not make sense.

I have a ton of love and respect for our military and police, but even with my positive opinion of the military and police I don't want to give up my RIGHT to protect myself and place the burden entirely on their shoulders. How stupid do you have to be to want to give up your RIGHT to protect yourself and place the burden of protection completely on the shoulders of those you hate and distrust while constantly telling them that you hate and distrust them? The answer is that you have to be exactly as stupid as a DUmmie.

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

The DUmmies hate and mistrust the military. The DUmmies hate and mistrust the police.

Which is peculiar since they demand the power to micromanage our lives.

Nevermind what dedicated criminals do. How exactly will they enforce their will once some farmer decides enough is enough and refuses to give-up his multi-generational family farm because some puffy-face unelected bureaucrat passed a rule no one needs or wants and then the community around him, which has also been simmering for years, joins him?

It is impossible to have a policy wholly dedicated to pushing those the Left holds in contempt without one day pushing too far no matter how law-abiding the victims prefer to be.

When you hold a live-and-let-live attitude the contempt leftists have is immaterial. You shrug it off because that is your nature by definition. But when you see they are insatiable and the more they gain the more ravenous they become you reach a point when the next drop will be the last drop.

Then the little tyrants will crawl from the alley, the dangling bodies of their bureaucratic kindred silhouetted in the flames rising from the Department Invasive Micromanagement, and they will skitter to the feet of the soldiers and policemen begging they reassert order. The soldier will reply that his ranks have been gutted and his is outnumbered and outgunned, even in Rhode Island and the policeman will reply he has no such time because he is preparing for his deposition at a brutality hearing because he left bruises on a meth-head while trying to affect an arrest.

And the mob will draw closer...

[jtyangel]

he relationship between bad guys and DUmmies is kind of strange. The Dummies love the bad guys as long as the bad guys are harming anyone but the DUmmies. If a bad guy robs, harms or kills a good and decent person the DUmmies will generally defend and make excuses for the bad guy. Only when the bad guy robs, harms or kills a DUmmie or one of the DUmmies' gods does the DUmmie opinion of that particular bad guy change.

this part I think speaks to a lack of empathy on their part. They have Zero ability to put themselves in the place of someone else and identify with that individual. I also think there is a certain superiority issue they have. They really do think they are superior to other people, because of this they generally tend to think others deserve to hurt, but if they turned into the others(think wealth) they then would be exempt from their own thinking. They exist in a world where their beliefs exempt them from the same ethical stigma they wish to place on other people. For example, if they were to become independently wealthy, buying a comfortable home for their family would be ok. If another business person was to do this, they would consider them as having more then their fair share ie they are exempt from their own moral indignation over things like wealth(Hollywood is a great example of this attitude).

 The only way I can really understand this thinking is to think that dummies actually are the opposite of what they purport to believe. They are clannish and operate on a feudal mentality. Anyone who deviates from their role of dependent on the 'king' is seen as an enemy and they have no problem with being manipulated to believe that atrocities are ok in some conditions but bad in others. They really have not matured mentally or emotionally beyond what their ancestors 1000 years ago were; they have merely changed the dynamics a bit to account for technology and such. The sad thing is when their numbers put someone in power who is dangerous and they get their feudel dreams fulfilled, it will be not only they but the people who did not wish for such things who will suffer. We are already seeing it happening and it takes a plague to rid us of enough of them to 'start over' again and usually their own deviant and slobbish behavior basically ensures a plague at some point. I think what amazes(and alarms) me is that despite the massive amounts of history easily disseminated as compared to 1000 years ago, they still can not identify patterns and repetition of things that have gone on before.

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

Astutely observed.

Flawlessly reasoned.

Impeccably delivered.

[jtyangel]

Astutely observed.

Flawlessly reasoned.

Impeccably delivered.

Coming from someone with the quality of thoughts/posts as yours, I thank you for that compliment SB!

[DumbAss Tanker]

Which is peculiar since they demand the power to micromanage our lives.

Ah, well now, you see that is because it is our lives they wish to see under the heel of a dominating paramilitary police presence, not theirs.

[Maxiest]

Great observations.

The DUmmies do this with almost all of their agenda's, they are good only if it benefits them and it doesn't apply to them.

And to the point jtyangel made, my mole actually argued on DU against some of the democrats wealth.  I almost burnt him because of it.  I figured I would get a lot of support against wealth but I found that the DUmmies don't care about the wealth of any one with a D beside their name.  They some how are righteous.  They were actually stepping all over themselves in the threads defending very very wealth democrats.  Comments like "Wealth isn't bad, the person who has it is" were very popular.

[FlippyDoo]

this part I think speaks to a lack of empathy on their part. They have Zero ability to put themselves in the place of someone else and identify with that individual. I also think there is a certain superiority issue they have. They really do think they are superior to other people, because of this they generally tend to think others deserve to hurt, but if they turned into the others(think wealth) they then would be exempt from their own thinking. They exist in a world where their beliefs exempt them from the same ethical stigma they wish to place on other people. For example, if they were to become independently wealthy, buying a comfortable home for their family would be ok. If another business person was to do this, they would consider them as having more then their fair share ie they are exempt from their own moral indignation over things like wealth(Hollywood is a great example of this attitude).

 The only way I can really understand this thinking is to think that dummies actually are the opposite of what they purport to believe. They are clannish and operate on a feudal mentality. Anyone who deviates from their role of dependent on the 'king' is seen as an enemy and they have no problem with being manipulated to believe that atrocities are ok in some conditions but bad in others. They really have not matured mentally or emotionally beyond what their ancestors 1000 years ago were; they have merely changed the dynamics a bit to account for technology and such. The sad thing is when their numbers put someone in power who is dangerous and they get their feudel dreams fulfilled, it will be not only they but the people who did not wish for such things who will suffer. We are already seeing it happening and it takes a plague to rid us of enough of them to 'start over' again and usually their own deviant and slobbish behavior basically ensures a plague at some point. I think what amazes(and alarms) me is that despite the massive amounts of history easily disseminated as compared to 1000 years ago, they still can not identify patterns and repetition of things that have gone on before.

I agree. They are extremely situational.

For example, if one of us hears that someone has murdered an innocent person we view that as bad. We don't need someone to tell us if it should be considered bad, and we don't need to know the shooter's color or politics. Or the victim's color or politics. Or financial status of either of them.

[Dori]

I agree. They are extremely situational.

For example, if one of us hears that someone has murdered an innocent person we view that as bad. We don't need someone to tell us if it should be considered bad, and we don't need to know the shooter's color or politics. Or the victim's color or politics. Or financial status of either of them.

I don't think they know instinctively how to think, they have to be told whats good and bad.  They get their cues from the media and which outlets are telling them.

I suppose over time they have been programed enough to react to certain issues, but we know if a Republican Pres. did the things Obama does, they would be screaming from the rooftops calling him a Nazi.

[Wineslob]

Excellent observations.

Prime example of the media being in concert with DUmmies of all flavors: Christopher Jordan Dorner.

[Maxiest]

"Situational"

Is a great description.