Author Topic: Primitive ponders court ruling on recess appointments.  (Read 946 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Freeper

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17779
  • Reputation: +1311/-314
  • Creepy ass cracker.
Primitive ponders court ruling on recess appointments.
« on: January 26, 2013, 09:01:27 AM »
Quote
busterbrown (586 posts)

Someone please explain how a Federal Appeals Court could suddenly decide to strike down Obama's


 
NLRB Recess appointments. Haven’t recent Presidents been both republicans and democrats been doing this for years? I’m sure it was a 2/1 party line vote ( yea, like judges don’t vote their party line) but isn’t it rather peculiar that they did not question this until now. Isn’t it obvious to everyone that this is just another partisan
attack? Can it hold up? The Supreme court might not strike the decision down since they gave into Obamacare
and Republicans on the court might feel they owe their base a ****ing crazy wing nut decision.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251280794

Quote
Tx4obama (26,081 posts)
1. Because The Senate was not adjourned and wasn't in an official recess, they were holding ...

Last edited Sat Jan 26, 2013, 03:25 AM USA/ET - Edit history (2)


... proforma sessions every three days - because The House would not agree to adjourn.

In order to be in an official recess (during holidays etc) both chambers of Congress have to agree to a adjournment resolution.

But the House Republicans had been obstructing and not agreeing to the resolution for a VERY VERY LONG TIME during MANY breaks when they'd been going home.

So, Pres Obama said something to himself like 'hey, these jerks are never ever going to go into an official recess and they are going to keep pulling this BS every time they leave D.C. and go home ... so 'F' them ... I'm going to make these appointments.

Something like that   

.... also, I think I heard on the news (or read somewhere) that the Court said that the way they read/interpreted the text of the U.S. Constitution was that the only time recess appointments could be made by The President was when the actual 'opening/vacancy' occurred while the Senate was not in session.

In my opinion they read it wrong.

I think if it gets to the Supreme Court they will over turn the lower court's ruling,
but I don't really have a clue since I am not an attorney or a judge and sometimes don't know what the heck I'm talking about   

So it boils down to 0bama over stepped his power, but lucky for him if it does make it to the SC in this lifetime they have Roberts there to help make sure it gets overturned.

I may not lock my doors while sitting at a red light and a black man is near, but I sure as hell grab on tight to my wallet when any democrats are close by.

Online Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19839
  • Reputation: +1618/-100
Re: Primitive ponders court ruling on recess appointments.
« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2013, 09:22:38 AM »
Quote
Someone please explain how a Federal Appeals Court could suddenly decide to strike down Obama's

You have to be kidding,you idiots have made having any federal judge or court overturn an act of Congress an industry.

Offline Delmar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5295
  • Reputation: +592/-41
Re: Primitive ponders court ruling on recess appointments.
« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2013, 10:12:06 AM »
Quote
Sat Jan 26, 2013, 03:02 AM
busterbrown (586 posts)

Someone please explain how a Federal Appeals Court could suddenly decide to strike down Obama's


 
NLRB Recess appointments.

Because they figured out that the dipshit Barry was past due for getting taken down a notch.
We will make America strong again. We will make America proud again. We will make America safe again. And we will make America great again.

Donald Trump

Offline 98ZJUSMC

  • The Most Deplorable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8424
  • Reputation: +436/-76
  • Now, with 99% less yellow!
Re: Primitive ponders court ruling on recess appointments.
« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2013, 10:26:54 AM »
You have to be kidding,you idiots have made having any federal judge or court overturn an act of Congress an industry.

Must have slipped their minds.   :whatever:

Quote
In my opinion they read it wrong.

I think if it gets to the Supreme Court they will over turn the lower court's ruling,
but I don't really have a clue since I am not an attorney or a judge and sometimes don't know what the heck I'm talking about      

OK, ....what minds?   :thatsright:
« Last Edit: January 26, 2013, 10:29:11 AM by 98ZJUSMC »
              

Liberal thinking is a two-legged stool and magical thinking is one of the legs, the other is a combination of self-loating and misanthropy.  To understand it, you would have to be able to sit on that stool while juggling two elephants, an anvil and a fragmentation grenade, sans pin.

"Accuse others of what you do." - Karl Marx

Offline I_B_Perky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7532
  • Reputation: +721/-329
Re: Primitive ponders court ruling on recess appointments.
« Reply #4 on: January 26, 2013, 10:16:30 PM »
Not to worry dummies. By the time it works it's way to the Supreme Court, obumbles will be out of office and it will all become moot.

Now dummies... I want you to think long and hard about this, long and hard, and be truthful. If GW Bush would have done this would you have the same opinion?

We both know the answer to that whether you dummies want to admit it or not.   :bird:

Now let us say the Supreme Court sides with obumbles. I'm sure you dummies will celebrate, but like all dummies you can't see beyond tomorrow. Sooner or later a republican president and dem congress will be in power and the republican president will do the same thing. I predict that the wailing and gnashing of teeth and screams of unconstitutional will dominate the dump.... and we will be there to remind you of your hypocrisy.  :popcorn:

Be careful what you ask for dummies... you just may get it.   
Living in the Dummies minds rent free since 2009!

Montani Semper Liberi