Author Topic: Binders Full of Women vs Ledgers Full of Nothing  (Read 853 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline formerlurker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9692
  • Reputation: +801/-833
Binders Full of Women vs Ledgers Full of Nothing
« on: October 20, 2012, 04:49:56 PM »
Quote
Binders Full of Women vs Ledgers Full of Nothing
By Mark Steyn
October 20, 2012 7:48 A.M.


The party that gave us annual trillion-dollar deficits as a permanent feature of life applies the same model closer to home:

    The official Federal Election Committee reports for September are out, and Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s DNC is a complete wreck. The Democrats ended September with cash on hand of $4.6 million, compared to the Republican National Committee’s $82.6 million.

    That’s nearly an 18-to-1 cash advantage for Republicans.

    Worse still for the DNC, they had to take out loans to pay the bills so that they owed $20.5 million at the end of September, meaning that that (subtracting cash on hand from total debt) they were $15.9 million in the red — essentially bankrupt. Wasserman-Schultz’s committee only raised $3.7 million in September; at that pace, it would take them more than four months to clear their debt, even if they didn’t spend another dime in the meantime.

Is the DNC allowed to do quantitative easing?

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner

Shame for the Congressional candidates looking for some help from the broke DNC.