I was more than a little annoyed at Romney repudiating the non-campaign-financed reconnection of Obama to Wright. He didn't have to come out and support the line of attack, but neither did he need to distance himelf so harshly from it, I thought, just when he was starting to consolidate conservatives. He can say "where else will they go?" all he likes, and some of them--not me, but some--will say, "we can stay at home," if he pisses off too many by turning away from something that should still, really, be a valid issue. Obama isn't so different from the man he was 3.5 years ago, and the things that made him what he is over decades should still be fair game. The fact of Breitbart's vetting alone supports that view of the matter, else why report the story at all?
It occurred to me, though, that now if--excuse me, when--Obama's super-PACS start attacking Romney's Mormonism, he can point to his taking the hight road now and say STFU your religin was off limits and so is mine--although it'd be more like "for shame, for shame." Of course I'd rather hear STFU.
So--pretty well done, after all.