http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002474943
How cute.
Now let me show you how it's done.
Liberals say:
* you have a duty to retreat.
* call the cops and let them handle it
* property can be replaced, it is not worth a human life
No conservative says Zimmerman or anyone else has a right to confront.
Yet, soon we will here that because Zimmerman followed Martin, Martin had a right to confront Zimmerman and initiated physical force.
No liberal will say Martin should have dropped his Skittles, retreated and waited for the police.
Horse shit.
I pursued a DUI while I was on I-25. I followed the car, keeping police informed of my location the entire time. When the driver parked and went to her apartment I followed to see which door she went through. Not only did the police rely on my information to affect an arrest they allowed me to make a written statement and at no time did the DA or defense council or anyone question my actions.
Do you have timestamped video evidence or pictures, or able to provide tape from security cameras?
Not to be a dweeb, and I appreciate what you were trying to do.
But if the suspect stated he did not drive in the past few hours, then your statement is essentially not going to pass muster (unless you yourself are LE). Even the audio on the phone wouldn't be enough in most cases, as audio can be conducted without a suspect.
My guess is the suspect confessed on the spot, in which case you are not on the spot anymore. But if I were the suspect, and I didn't say anything to the cop when he came to the door, there would be plenty of room for reasonable doubt.
Again, Sarge, not dissing your actions, and in fact I would have done the same thing, but if there was no video, no corresponding evidence (perhaps a warm car engine), or no witnesses from where he came from or others who also saw him drive under the influence, then there essentially is no case.