http://www.democraticunderground.com/1117237Omaha Steve (31,276 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
Kicking Underdogs When They're Down
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/leo-w-gerard/right-to-work-laws-labor-unions_b_1270729.html
Americans love an underdog. Maybe it's an artifact of the American Revolution, when a rag-tag rabble of farmers and frontiersmen defeated the disciplined and well-provisioned military of the most powerful nation on earth.
Even though the United States has usurped most powerful status, Americans still ally with Davids in contests with Goliaths. They love to see a top dog taken down a notch. They rooted for the perennial loser Red Sox in the 2004 World Series and reveled in the win by America's unseasoned ice hockey team in the 1980 Winter Olympics.
That's why the sudden surge of right-to-work (for less) legislation is so confounding. Right-to-work (for less) laws are perks for the wealthy, for the top dogs. These laws facilitate destruction of unions. The concerted action of a labor union is a tool that workers use to win fair wages, benefits and conditions from the powerful, from the likes of massive multi-national corporations. At a time of dwindling union membership, at a time when labor union participation is so small as to be nearly negligible, state legislatures across the country are taking up right-to-work (for less) laws that will further decimate union ranks. They're kicking the underdog when it's down.
Despite the derisive "big union boss" label that right wingers throw at labor leaders, unions are not the big dogs. Union representation in the United States has declined steadily since the 1950s, following federal legislation in 1947 impeding unionization. Just after World War II, about 35 percent of workers belonged to unions. And those who didn't benefitted from the higher wages and good benefits that union workers negotiated because non-union employers felt compelled to provide competitive compensation. Last year, the percentage of U.S. workers in unions fell to 11.9, the lowest in more than 70 years.
FULL story at link.
This campfire's been up and burning since Monday, but no primitive's been to it.
I've been eagerly awaiting for my fellow Nebraskan to state his campaign platform for his race for the Bellevue City Council; it's getting kind of boring sitting around twiddling one's thumbs, doing nothing, waiting.
Time's a-wasting, big guy; lost time is never recovered. Once it's gone, it's gone.
I was against Omaha's Ed Norton running for office, because he'd inevitably make an ass of himself, and by extension, make all the rest of we Nebraskans look bad too. But I've grown resigned to it.
Actually, it might be interesting. Or not.
If Omaha Steve tells the voting public the same things he tells the primitives, it'll be boring; if he tells the people of Bellevue he wants socialism; he wants to raise taxes, expand government, increase the power of public-sector labor unions, repeal the Second Amendment, well, what can one say?
But if Chief Crying Hatchet tells the primitives one thing and tells the voters of Bellevue another thing, speaking with a forked tongue, it'll be time for decent and civilized people to get out of their teepees and pow-wow on the war-path.
