expatriot (1000+ posts) Thu Mar-02-06 01:46 AM
Original message
"Hitler was a liberal"
This is amazing. It is published on Alan Keyes' Renew America.
I am speechless.
Hitler was a liberal
Christian Hartsock
March 1, 2006
It is an indispensable fact that in the absence of love for God resides a lust for power; a yearning to become God. In Sinisterism: Secular Religion of the Lie, a brilliant new book by my good friend and colleague, Bruce Walker, Walker uses "Sinisterism," a term he invented, to denote this godless, narcissistic, relativistic lust for power whose legacy lived particularly in the twentieth century and prevails to this day. As he writes: "I call all the people who lust for power, 'Sinisterists' and their political system 'Sinisterism.'
The word sinister comes from the Latin root word for left, which has come to mean creepy and nasty — 'sinister,' in modern usage — so 'Sinisterist' and 'Sinisterism' fit what I mean, well. Sinisterists believe in nothing, really, but power. They use power to hurt to bewilder, to dismay, to complicate, to rob, to cheat, and to use."
In my humble opinion, Sinisterism has been the central governing element of Nazis, Soviets, fascist dictators, militant secularists, radical liberals and the pathetic lowlives at the ACLU. Their collectively shared hatred for God, Christianity, moral values and the value of human life instills in them a spirit of Sinisterism.
Contemporary liberals have sought to eliminate acknowledgement of the prevalence of Sinisterism by coming up with labels to equate Nazism with fascism, Christianity and conservatism and liberalism with liberty and liberation. But as Walker writes, "The term 'liberal' has nothing to do with freedom and everything to do with coercion."
Furthermore, Walker effectively deconstructs the semantic stigmas deceptively conjured up by liberals to euphemize their inherent evil. As he writes: "The reality is that Sinisterists sometimes call themselves 'socialists' or 'liberals' or 'progressives,' and that they sometimes call themselves 'Marxists' or 'Trotskyites' or 'revolutionaries,' or that they also sometimes call themselves 'fascists' or 'national socialists' or 'Phallangists' but they are all sibling Sinisterists."
As I mentioned earlier, when liberals are not trying to pass Nazism off as "fascism," they are attempting to pass it off as an extreme form of "conservatism" and an inexorable byproduct of Christianity. In 2003, on his show Scarborough Country, former congressman and current MSNBC personality Joe Scarborough shed light on a college textbook that grouped Rush Limbaugh and Ronald Reagan with Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini as "conservatives."
Now how exactly could Hitler, a man who was a strong supporter of social welfare programs, gun control, animal rights, government funding for the arts and bans against smoking in public get away with being called a "conservative"?
The reason is simple. Liberals are such shameless liars and persistent revisionists that they will malign anyone they disagree with as Hitleresque, from the spastic Iraq war protestors comparing George W. Bush to Hitler to Sen. Dick Durbin comparing American troops to "Nazis." Perhaps this is on account of the equivalence of their deep-seated rejection of God to Hitler's militant rejection of God which led to one of the ugliest mass murders in human history. But wait a minute, wasn't Hitler a Christian also?
-----------To read the answer to that question and so many more Truths that offer the only Hope for us
Sadistic Sinister liberals, click here: http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/hartsock/060301
and then email a very POLITE (remember, this poor boy's expecting to be hit by tons of foaming at the mouth sinister liberal emails.)response to him at: ChrisHartsock86@aol.com
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Thu Mar-02-06 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. Get a load of THIS
<<It is impossible for tyranny, terror and totalitarianism to be carried out in the name of God.>>
Is it actually possible for someone to be this ignorant without forgetting to put clothes on when they leave the house? Has he NO knowledge of European history, how the tyrants and the Church climbed in bed together and savaged the serfs in the name of religion on a daily basis? The Church propped up the crown and the crown propped up the Church.
Does he know nothing about the Inquisition, about the witch trials, about the tyranny imposed by "godly men" upon women and children even here in the new world?
What a little worm.
Hmmmm. I didn't know the maudlin waif primitive was a scholar of European history.
He must've missed the chapter about how it was the churchmen who wrote the
Magna Carta.
But maybe the maudlin waif primitive didn't know what the
Magna Carta was.
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Thu Mar-02-06 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. Let's see what's wrong with this...
1) Hitler based much of his organization and philosophy on Benito Mussilini.
2) Hitler purged the Nazi party of Ernst Rohm and other socialists between 1933 and 1934.
3) Hitler persecuted socialists, communists and other leftist thinkers.
4) The Nazi Party's major political allies included, the right-wing Nationalists led by Alfred Hugenberg, the press baron, and his Vice-Chancellor was the ex-Centre Party politician and former Chancellor Franz von Papen.
5) Hitler referred to churches as the "most important factors" for the maintenance of German well-being. Kinda similar to Marx's position of "Religion is the opiate of the masses." If you are totally clueless.
6) One of Hitler's heroes was Dietrich Eckart. Hitler was impressed with Drexler's anti-Semitic, nationalist and anti-Marxist ideas.
7) Fascism by definition attracts big business, landowners, nationalists and reactionaries. Nationalists and Reactionaries are two groups that are definately not progressives.
BlakeB (286 posts) Thu Mar-02-06 03:32 AM
Response to Original message
15. Anyone else find that...
conservatives seem to have no sense of history? This guy is ridiculous, by the way.
coda (1000+ posts) Thu Mar-02-06 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
22. " Liberals are such shameless liars and persistent revisionists..."
LOL! If there was ever a more classic example of a strawman.....
That's right Chris, just keep repeating a newly invented word that _ no one _ has ever heard of and claim that, "Contemporary liberals have sought to eliminate acknowledgement of" "it". LMAO
"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.
- Joseph Goebbels
Just keep repeating your mantra, Chris. After all, Goebbels says it will work.
Well, it certainly worked for Walter Cronkite, Dan Rather, the Democrat National Committee, Herb Kirkstreit, Mike Malloy, John Dean, Michael Moore, Al Sharpton, Bobby Kennedy, Vast Teddy, Harrison Salisbury, Walter Duranty, Molly Ivins, the Magic One, &c., &c., &c., all of them masters of repeating lies until they're believed.
