I googled my screen name and it finally appeared on page 5. 
Coach, you appeared right off the bat, as soon as I convinced Google I wasn't searching for the former Nebraska coach of the same name.
You even got a DU mention as well! 
I googled JohnnyReb and after a few pages, I still wasn't up....but I did find a better JohnnyReb website.
http://ajohnnyrebinayankeeworld.blogspot.com/He had this to say......
This is because liberalism cannot abide the use of judgment. Liberals believe that judgment itself is intolerant. And so rather than have us all be equal before the government, liberals seek to use the government to force us all into nonjudgmentalism. Rather than trying to teach others how to judge properly, liberals seek to condemn the act of judgment altogether. And so racism is condemned, not for being inaccurate, but for being an act of judgment. Sexism is condemned for being an act of judgment, not for being inaccurate.
Tolerance is praised, not for being accurate, but for being the absence of judgment.
As Plato said, "Neither does he [meaning a democracy] receive or let pass into the fortress any true words of advice; if anyone says to him that some pleasures are the satisfaction of good and noble desires and others of evil desires, and that he ought to use and honor some and chastise and master the others - whenever this is repeated to him he shakes his head and says that they are all alike, and that one is as good as another."
As Ayn Rand said,
Nothing can corrupt and disintegrate a culture or a man’s character as thoroughly as does the precept of moral agnosticism, the idea that one must never pass moral judgment on others, that one must be morally tolerant of anything, that the good consists of never distinguishing good from evil.
It is obvious who profits and who loses by such a precept. It is not justice or equal treatment that you grant to men when you abstain equally from praising men’s virtues and from condemning men’s vices. When your impartial attitude declares, in effect, that neither the good nor the evil may expect anything from you—whom do you betray and whom do you encourage?
The goal here seems to be to convince people that the use of moral judgment itself is immoral. Plato predicted that this is how a democracy would end.
