More love for the Top General in Iraq.......................****ing traitors
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3197513alyce douglas (1000+ posts) Wed Apr-23-08 02:38 PM
Original message
HEADS UP DU'ERS READ THIS ONE RE: PETREAUS
Advertisements [?]Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 02:40 PM by alyce douglas
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7363465.stm
US Defence Secretary Robert Gates has recommended the top military commander in Iraq, General David Petraeus, be appointed head of US Central Command.
CentCom covers an area from the Horn of Africa into central Asia and includes all operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Gen Petraeus's appointment is subject to the approval of the US Senate.
He would replace Navy Adm William Fallon, who stepped down in March after a reported split with President George W Bush over his policy on Iran.
this is not good news at all.
This is great you dumbass IDJIT
Ichingcarpenter (1000+ posts) Wed Apr-23-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. He is one General I really don't trust
Because he doesn't even follow or know about the Constitution.
Ron Paul asks on the record General PETRAEUS if the United States will ask Congress according to the CONSTITUTION before it decides to bomb IRAN. They answer hum, mmm, uh, oh, hmmm RON PAUL then SILENCES them by saying the answer should be a definate NO!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oOrgoslUe0
Oh could it be this June..........
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Wed Apr-23-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. What if the Senate doesn't approve?
Is there someone worse than Petraeus?
alyce douglas (1000+ posts) Wed Apr-23-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I only wish the Senate would call Fallon forward to come to committee
and ask why he stepped down.
Me too....................cause IIRC he said that Iran was not the reason he retired and that he also did, does and will support *
underpants (1000+ posts) Wed Apr-23-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Not voting for Patreus would be like voting against flag pins
and there is NO WAY the Dems will get it together enough to do that
Yeah kinda like that Betrayus add that caused a shitstorm and made all the Idjits keep quiet this time he was here..............Naw, couldn't be that the "Surge isn't working, We've lost" before the surge started and before Dingy Harry threw the white flag up for all to see???? Naw
stellanoir (1000+ posts) Wed Apr-23-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Agreed
This story made me queasy, especially after hearing Ritter on Steph's show the other day.
Maybe I'm delusional but I just don't think they'll get away with it again.
I'm thinking most of the Joint Chief's know that the military is stretched, if not entirely broken.
again
Yes................Delusional, we can agree on
8_year_nightmare (1000+ posts) Wed Apr-23-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. Not good at all. Impeachment of BushCheneyCo could have prevented this type of spawning.
A Wesley Clark, he is not.
A big clue with neon lights around it (Iran) that they are planning something desperate.
Thank the lord that he's not
leveymg (1000+ posts) Wed Apr-23-08 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. This time, I hope the Senate discusses Patreaus' major role in the Iraq WMD deception
See, leveymg's Journal - PETRAEUS' IRAQ WMD DECEPTION: How the General ... - 4 visits - Apr 8The terrible irony is that nobody seems to have raised questions about the fraud that connects General Petreaus to the Iraq WMD deception and the Plame case ...
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/leveymg/311
PETRAEUS' IRAQ WMD DECEPTION: How the General Earned His Stripes With Bush-Cheney
Posted by leveymg in General Discussion
Tue Sep 11th 2007, 08:26 AM
In the last few days, it's come to light that Gen. Petraeus was the original source for incorrect information released to the U.S. media in May 2003 that mobile biological warfare trailers had been located in Iraq. False intelligence findings were indeed substituted for a 122-page DIA report suppressed by the Pentagon.
During the next year, the Bush-Cheney Administration continued to make false assertions that Saddam Hussein had a biotoxins program in place before the invasion, and that certain trailers found in Iraq proved that claim.
We now learn that a team of Defense Intelligence Agency investigators concluded on May 26 that the trailers found had no connection to a biowarfare program, but, nonetheless, Pentagon spokesmen and the Administration continued to make unfounded allegations that the mobile labs had been manufacturing anthrax, smallpox, and other deadly germs.
Gen. Petraeus appears to have taken no steps to correct the record after he falsely stated to reporters on May 13 that there is a "reasonable degree of certainty that this is in fact a mobile biological agent production trailer."
We should all ask why this part of Petraeus' history has been glossed over. Why has Congress and the media not pointed this out about the General before?
MORE ***
OMG.............
..............not only is this poo flinger using their own stuff as the facts, but they are citing DU as the source
alyce douglas (1000+ posts) Wed Apr-23-08 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. oh, I have an over reactive mind
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 03:08 PM by alyce douglas
now, put this article with this thread. connect the dots or do I have this on
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...
What a bunch of IDJITS.......
