Author Topic: OK, whose mole is Taverner?  (Read 2865 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23573
  • Reputation: +2492/-270
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
OK, whose mole is Taverner?
« on: May 17, 2011, 03:21:49 PM »
He's either in full meltdown mode or somebody is playing the mole-role over-the-top:

Quote
Taverner  (1000+ posts)        Tue May-17-11 12:25 PM
Original message
How do we destroy the blue dogs?
 These guys have been the thorn in our side ever since I can remember.
 
blah-blah-blah

<snip>


Quote
Taverner  (1000+ posts)        Tue May-17-11 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. With "friends" like Stupak, you really don't need enemies
 And if his district goes in that direction, maybe we need to engage in some shenanigans, you know what I mean?

In the end its all about GOTV. Liberals would rule this country with a recycled iron fist if we just got out the vote...and made sure other's didn't

 
Quote
sufrommich  (1000+ posts)        Tue May-17-11 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. You obviously know nothing about his district.You can
 "get out the vote" all you want up in the U.P. and you would still find Stupak the most liberal democrat you could run. Your calls for dirty tricks sound trollish at best.
 

Quote
Taverner  (1000+ posts)        Tue May-17-11 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Who said we need to let the conservatives vote?
 We need to play the same game the GOP is

You don't ask for it - you TAKE it
 

Quote
sufrommich  (1000+ posts)        Tue May-17-11 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Are you saying that the only way to elect liberal democrats is
 throw the election?
 

Quote
Taverner  (1000+ posts)        Tue May-17-11 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. No I'm saying that's the only way to win any election these days
 The votes are rigged and have been since the 2000 election

Time to rig them in our favor for a change


This is what happens when people are allowed to indulge in baseless fantasies.

To DU's credit they are about to jump his shit with a rhetorical sock full of nickels:
 
Quote
sufrommich  (1000+ posts)        Tue May-17-11 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. A ridiculous argument. Sorry I wasted my time. nt

 
Quote
Tommy_Carcetti (1000+ posts)        Tue May-17-11 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #24
74. Ummm....no. Not going to support any disenfranchisement, ever. Even of conservatives.
 Reminds me of the people who say we need to torture people to "protect our freedom and democracy." If the means don't justify the ends, the ends simply aren't justified, period.
 

Quote
SDuderstadt  (1000+ posts)      Tue May-17-11 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. "Who said we need to let the conservatives vote?"
 The Constitution.


Quote
dionysus  (1000+ posts)        Tue May-17-11 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
73. so you want to see conservative dems homeless on the streets, and you want jim crow laws for
 republicans.

i can just smell the "liberal" compassion and sense of justice!
 

Quote
Taverner  (1000+ posts)        Tue May-17-11 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. No we need to shape districts in our favor
 In my opinion, and this is just me, but I would like to see a bunch of Conservative District votes just "disappear" the way the GOP makes our votes "disappear"

Fire with fire

Did anyone bother to mention marijuana use is often associated with paranoia?

Quote
Taverner  (1000+ posts)        Tue May-17-11 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Better than we would have thought
 The Republicans will eat their own, but they need help.

Don't get me wrong, I want to see both Stupak AND Bachmann penniless and dispossessed

Quote
SDuderstadt  (1000+ posts)      Tue May-17-11 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. "Don't get me wrong"
 Well, MY irony meter just broke!
 

Quote
dionysus  (1000+ posts)        Tue May-17-11 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
69. the republicans are eating their own, so you want us to... eat our own. brilliant. just brilliant.
   

Quote
Taverner  (1000+ posts)        Tue May-17-11 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
31. Um, the Bluedoggies declared war on us long ago
 I believe their epithet for us was "McGoverniks," which painted us all as losers and communists

Their hate for us hasn't let up, yet we have to be all nice and kumbaya with them

yeah

right

McGovernik = declaration of war

This kid must have been a hoot on the playground.

Behold the pure joy of the sub-thread to follow:

Quote
pintobean  (1000+ posts)      Tue May-17-11 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Get use to Nov. 2010 results
.
 
Quote
Taverner  (1000+ posts)        Tue May-17-11 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Weren't you the one petty enough to corrrect my grammar a while back? It's USED, not use
   

Quote
pintobean  (1000+ posts)      Tue May-17-11 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #34
44. I doubt it.
 My grammar sucks.
 

Quote
Maru Kitteh  (1000+ posts)        Tue May-17-11 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #34
60. Whatsamatta? Smoke get in your eyes? Forgetting things? n/t
   
 Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Quote
DevonRex  (1000+ posts)        Tue May-17-11 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. *snort*


Quote
SDuderstadt  (1000+ posts)      Tue May-17-11 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #60
67. DJ: "Next caller!".
 Me: "I would like to dedicate 'Smoke gets in Your Eyes" to Taverner and ask for good thoughts so that he passes his drug test!".
  Printer

Quote
DevonRex  (1000+ posts)        Tue May-17-11 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #67
82. I'd like you to play "Dazed and Confused" please.


After that he had a few comments deleted.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1119624#1119998

His paranoia over his impending drug test and subsequent dismissal is wearing on his nerves. He's lashing out, bitter and angry, and it will always be the fault of The Others.

Love him while he's still with us.
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."

Offline JustVisiting

  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 17
  • Reputation: +9/-6
Re: OK, whose mole is Taverner?
« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2011, 03:33:37 PM »
He's having a pretty tough time of things right now.  He didn't get the job.  The last post I saw of his, he said he was getting drunk.  These posts of his are worrying me to be honest. 

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23573
  • Reputation: +2492/-270
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
Re: OK, whose mole is Taverner?
« Reply #2 on: May 17, 2011, 03:39:42 PM »
He's having a pretty tough time of things right now.  He didn't get the job.  The last post I saw of his, he said he was getting drunk.  These posts of his are worrying me to be honest. 

He's the final arbiter of many of his fortunes and he should bask in what he has worked so diligently to achieve.

If he can't then perhaps he should work towards something else.



At any rate, welcome. I hope you will do more than Just Visit.
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."

Offline dutch508

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12577
  • Reputation: +1731/-1068
  • Remember
Re: OK, whose mole is Taverner?
« Reply #3 on: May 17, 2011, 03:40:20 PM »
He's having a pretty tough time of things right now.  He didn't get the job.  The last post I saw of his, he said he was getting drunk.  These posts of his are worrying me to be honest. 



 :fuelfire:
The torch of moral clarity since 12/18/07

2016 DOTY: 06 Omaha Steve - Is dying for ****'s face! How could you not vote for him, you heartless bastards!?!

Offline Karin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17752
  • Reputation: +1895/-81
Re: OK, whose mole is Taverner?
« Reply #4 on: May 17, 2011, 03:44:47 PM »
Quite a find, SSB.

Quote
DevonRex  (1000+ posts)        Tue May-17-11 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #38
47. That's the most sickening thing I've ever read here. You need to apologize
 and delete it. Seriously.

Now that's saying something!

Quote
which painted us all as losers and communists

Yeah, pretty much.  

Offline JustVisiting

  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 17
  • Reputation: +9/-6
Re: OK, whose mole is Taverner?
« Reply #5 on: May 17, 2011, 04:40:00 PM »
Dutch, I can see I won't be able to drink soda when you're posting, I snorted it all over the screen at that South Park image!


Online Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19839
  • Reputation: +1618/-100
Re: OK, whose mole is Taverner?
« Reply #6 on: May 17, 2011, 04:54:07 PM »
Who are they kidding,the majority of the DUmp would disenfranchise anyone that didn`t follow their views if they could.

Offline Evil_Conservative

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7845
  • Reputation: +554/-194
  • Oh snap!
Re: OK, whose mole is Taverner?
« Reply #7 on: May 17, 2011, 04:56:21 PM »
He's having a pretty tough time of things right now.  He didn't get the job.  The last post I saw of his, he said he was getting drunk.  These posts of his are worrying me to be honest. 

He should study harder for those drug tests next time.
You may call me Jessica or Jess.

Offline jukin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16241
  • Reputation: +2120/-170
Re: OK, whose mole is Taverner?
« Reply #8 on: May 17, 2011, 07:53:10 PM »
I admit it he's mine.  :whistling:
When you are the beneficiary of someone’s kindness and generosity, it produces a sense of gratitude and community.

When you are the beneficiary of a policy that steals from someone and gives it to you in return for your vote, it produces a sense of entitlement and dependency.

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Re: OK, whose mole is Taverner?
« Reply #9 on: May 17, 2011, 08:20:34 PM »
I admit it he's mine.  :whistling:
No, I'm Tavener !

Offline GOBUCKS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24186
  • Reputation: +1812/-339
  • All in all, not bad, not bad at all
Re: OK, whose mole is Taverner?
« Reply #10 on: May 17, 2011, 08:28:32 PM »
No, I'm Tavener !
No, I am Taverner.

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: OK, whose mole is Taverner?
« Reply #11 on: May 18, 2011, 10:31:36 AM »
Well, that will at least make it easier to figure out which one of you is Spartacus.

As far as the 'love him while he is with us,' I really did not pick up that he had AIDS from his testing thread, but that he had a herniated disc and that was the purpose of his MJ scrip, but I have to admit I didn't read the entire parade of stupidity, either. 
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline NHSparky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24431
  • Reputation: +1280/-617
  • Where are you going? I was gonna make espresso!
Re: OK, whose mole is Taverner?
« Reply #12 on: May 18, 2011, 11:07:13 AM »
No, **I** am Taverner!  Or Spartacus!  Aw, shit, I forget.  Must be all the pot.

Quote
Taverner  (1000+ posts)        Tue May-17-11 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. No we need to shape districts in our favor
 In my opinion, and this is just me, but I would like to see a bunch of Conservative District votes just "disappear" the way the GOP makes our votes "disappear"

Fire with fire


Dear DUmbass--pick up a dictionary, or navigate to Google on a computer.  Look up the word, "Gerrymandering".

http://pajamasmedia.com/zombie/2010/11/11/the-top-ten-most-gerrymandered-congressional-districts-in-the-united-states/

Oh, and of those 10 districts, guess how many belong to Democrats?  (Hint: 6.  It would have been 7 but Phil Hare--remember him?--lost his seat.)
“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.”  -Henry Ford

Offline tanstaafl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1409
  • Reputation: +110/-22
  • I AM the NRA. And I VOTE
Re: OK, whose mole is Taverner?
« Reply #13 on: May 18, 2011, 11:09:51 AM »
Well, that will at least make it easier to figure out which one of you is Spartacus.

As far as the 'love him while he is with us,' I really did not pick up that he had AIDS from his testing thread, but that he had a herniated disc and that was the purpose of his MJ scrip, but I have to admit I didn't read the entire parade of stupidity, either.  

It was a pretty circular affair. More prancing around pointing fingers at Poor Taverner who apparently didn't have the strength to lift his gun. Kept shooting himself in the foot. Lame bastard.

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23573
  • Reputation: +2492/-270
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
Re: OK, whose mole is Taverner?
« Reply #14 on: May 18, 2011, 11:11:43 AM »
...Phil Hare--remember him?

No relation.

...Poor Taverner who apparently didn't have the strength to lift his gun. Kept shooting himself in the foot...

Confuscius say, "He who shoot with limp wrist, risks limp."
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."

Offline jukin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16241
  • Reputation: +2120/-170
Re: OK, whose mole is Taverner?
« Reply #15 on: May 18, 2011, 12:34:27 PM »
Quote
Taverner  (1000+ posts)        Tue May-17-11 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. No we need to shape districts in our favor
 In my opinion, and this is just me, but I would like to see a bunch of Conservative District votes just "disappear" the way the GOP makes our votes "disappear"

Fire with fire

You see I posted this because all the primitives know that the state houses got crushed in 2010 and painted solid red.

I am Taverner!
When you are the beneficiary of someone’s kindness and generosity, it produces a sense of gratitude and community.

When you are the beneficiary of a policy that steals from someone and gives it to you in return for your vote, it produces a sense of entitlement and dependency.

Offline Karin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17752
  • Reputation: +1895/-81
Re: OK, whose mole is Taverner?
« Reply #16 on: May 18, 2011, 12:37:29 PM »
Well, I voted for all of you two years running.  You know I love you.