He's either in full meltdown mode or somebody is playing the mole-role over-the-top:
Taverner (1000+ posts) Tue May-17-11 12:25 PM
Original message
How do we destroy the blue dogs?
These guys have been the thorn in our side ever since I can remember.
blah-blah-blah
<snip>
Taverner (1000+ posts) Tue May-17-11 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. With "friends" like Stupak, you really don't need enemies
And if his district goes in that direction, maybe we need to engage in some shenanigans, you know what I mean?
In the end its all about GOTV. Liberals would rule this country with a recycled iron fist if we just got out the vote...and made sure other's didn't
sufrommich (1000+ posts) Tue May-17-11 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. You obviously know nothing about his district.You can
"get out the vote" all you want up in the U.P. and you would still find Stupak the most liberal democrat you could run. Your calls for dirty tricks sound trollish at best.
Taverner (1000+ posts) Tue May-17-11 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Who said we need to let the conservatives vote?
We need to play the same game the GOP is
You don't ask for it - you TAKE it
sufrommich (1000+ posts) Tue May-17-11 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Are you saying that the only way to elect liberal democrats is
throw the election?
Taverner (1000+ posts) Tue May-17-11 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. No I'm saying that's the only way to win any election these days
The votes are rigged and have been since the 2000 election
Time to rig them in our favor for a change
This is what happens when people are allowed to indulge in baseless fantasies.
To DU's credit they are about to jump his shit with a rhetorical sock full of nickels:
sufrommich (1000+ posts) Tue May-17-11 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. A ridiculous argument. Sorry I wasted my time. nt
Tommy_Carcetti (1000+ posts) Tue May-17-11 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #24
74. Ummm....no. Not going to support any disenfranchisement, ever. Even of conservatives.
Reminds me of the people who say we need to torture people to "protect our freedom and democracy." If the means don't justify the ends, the ends simply aren't justified, period.
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Tue May-17-11 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. "Who said we need to let the conservatives vote?"
The Constitution.
dionysus (1000+ posts) Tue May-17-11 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
73. so you want to see conservative dems homeless on the streets, and you want jim crow laws for
republicans.
i can just smell the "liberal" compassion and sense of justice!
Taverner (1000+ posts) Tue May-17-11 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. No we need to shape districts in our favor
In my opinion, and this is just me, but I would like to see a bunch of Conservative District votes just "disappear" the way the GOP makes our votes "disappear"
Fire with fire
Did anyone bother to mention marijuana use is often associated with paranoia?
Taverner (1000+ posts) Tue May-17-11 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Better than we would have thought
The Republicans will eat their own, but they need help.
Don't get me wrong, I want to see both Stupak AND Bachmann penniless and dispossessed
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Tue May-17-11 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. "Don't get me wrong"
Well, MY irony meter just broke!
dionysus (1000+ posts) Tue May-17-11 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
69. the republicans are eating their own, so you want us to... eat our own. brilliant. just brilliant.
Taverner (1000+ posts) Tue May-17-11 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
31. Um, the Bluedoggies declared war on us long ago
I believe their epithet for us was "McGoverniks," which painted us all as losers and communists
Their hate for us hasn't let up, yet we have to be all nice and kumbaya with them
yeah
right
McGovernik = declaration of war
This kid must have been a hoot on the playground.
Behold the pure joy of the sub-thread to follow:
pintobean (1000+ posts) Tue May-17-11 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Get use to Nov. 2010 results
.
Taverner (1000+ posts) Tue May-17-11 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Weren't you the one petty enough to corrrect my grammar a while back? It's USED, not use
pintobean (1000+ posts) Tue May-17-11 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #34
44. I doubt it.
My grammar sucks.
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Tue May-17-11 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #34
60. Whatsamatta? Smoke get in your eyes? Forgetting things? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Tue May-17-11 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. *snort*
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Tue May-17-11 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #60
67. DJ: "Next caller!".
Me: "I would like to dedicate 'Smoke gets in Your Eyes" to Taverner and ask for good thoughts so that he passes his drug test!".
Printer
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Tue May-17-11 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #67
82. I'd like you to play "Dazed and Confused" please.
After that he had a few comments deleted.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1119624#1119998His paranoia over his impending drug test and subsequent dismissal is wearing on his nerves. He's lashing out, bitter and angry, and it will always be the fault of The Others.
Love him while he's still with us.