« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Pedro Picasso could be wrong  (Read 1719 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Pedro Picasso could be wrong
« on: April 20, 2011, 02:26:57 PM »
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x928283

Oh my.

Quote
Atman  (1000+ posts)        Wed Apr-20-11 12:39 PM
PEDRO PICASSO
Original message

Why are the Republicans being so brazen about their plans to dismantle America?

I think it is simple; they've had a few election cycles to work the kinks out of their vote rigging electronic voting. Americans don't even talk about it anymore. And we don't bat an eye -- the media makes sure of it -- even when the theft is as blatant as the Prosser debacle in Wisconsin.

I posted before the Obama election that the GOP was desperate to actually LOSE that one. The economic disaster they had deliberately created needed a new Democratic figure head. A couple years of pain, with a president who might not even be from this country, would set the stage. They would make sure things got so bad, the political climate so poisoned, that any GOP win, no matter how absurd (as in Wisconsin) could be made to seem plausible. A compliant media would seal the deal.

Do you think this is far fetched? One only has to go back to the pre-Bush pronouncements of Grover Norquist, George Casey and other of Bush's economic henchmen to see the writing that was on the wall. They spoke openly of destroying the economy in order to rebuild it in their GOP utopian dream image. They spoke of mass societal pain needed to help bring about their goals. Distrusted, discredited voting machines were just one step along the way. I think they think they've got it figured out enough to pull it off, no matter how blatant their attempts.

Of course, I could be wrong.

It's a modest campfire, nothing particular of note, other than more demonstration of Pedro Picasso's "it's a conspiracy, everything's a conspiracy" bullshit.
Logged
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline Freeper

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17779
  • Reputation: +1311/-314
  • Creepy ass cracker.
Re: Pedro Picasso could be wrong
« Reply #1 on: April 20, 2011, 02:30:54 PM »
Everything is some huge conspiracy to these goons.
Coincidentally most of them admit to smoking pot.  :stoner:
Wonder if there is any connection between the 2.
 :lmao:
Logged
I may not lock my doors while sitting at a red light and a black man is near, but I sure as hell grab on tight to my wallet when any democrats are close by.

Offline Mike220

  • Proud owner of a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4650
  • Reputation: +310/-122
  • Ron Swanson is my hero
Re: Pedro Picasso could be wrong
« Reply #2 on: April 20, 2011, 02:33:53 PM »
Quote
Atman  (1000+ posts)        Wed Apr-20-11 12:39 PM
PEDRO PICASSO
Original message

Of course, I could be wrong.

Could be? Oh, my dear Pedro, there is no question of this. Of course, like all the other "mind" shits you and your ilk have, you'll never recognize this. If I was a psychology student, I could make the DUmp the subject of one hell of a doctoral thesis. So many neuroses in one place...
Logged
Blackmail is such an ugly word. I prefer "extortion." The "X" makes it sound cool. - Bender

"jews run the media" -- CreativeChristie
Woohoo! Bow to me peasants -- Me

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Re: Pedro Picasso could be wrong
« Reply #3 on: April 20, 2011, 02:35:28 PM »
Quote from: Freeper on April 20, 2011, 02:30:54 PM
Everything is some huge conspiracy to these goons.

Coincidentally most of them admit to smoking pot.  :stoner:

Wonder if there is any connection between the 2.

:lmao:

I dunno; Pedro Picasso's never struck me as the type to do dope, unless when he was young (he's no longer young) or in college or something.

This "everything's a conspiracy" fetish of his is certainly one of the most intriguing aspects of his character.

In case anyone's wondering, Pedro Picasso was raised in one of those Levittowns down in Florida, and was born with his eyes glued to the television set.
Logged
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline Ralph Wiggum

  • It's unpossible that I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19495
  • Reputation: +2554/-49
Re: Pedro Picasso could be wrong
« Reply #4 on: April 20, 2011, 02:35:32 PM »
Um, the Republicans are trying to put America back together, Atman/TexasToast/Pedro Picasso.  It's the 0bumbler that's trying to dismantle it.
Logged
Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender

Offline Freeper

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17779
  • Reputation: +1311/-314
  • Creepy ass cracker.
Re: Pedro Picasso could be wrong
« Reply #5 on: April 20, 2011, 02:41:02 PM »
Quote from: franksolich on April 20, 2011, 02:35:28 PM
I dunno; Pedro Picasso's never struck me as the type to do dope, unless when he was young (he's no longer young) or in college or something.

This "everything's a conspiracy" fetish of his is certainly one of the most intriguing aspects of his character.

In case anyone's wondering, Pedro Picasso was raised in one of those Levittowns down in Florida, and was born with his eyes glued to the television set.

Well he is a huge dope. So if he partakes of the herb, I wouldn't be shocked.
Of course, I could be wrong.  :lmao:
Logged
I may not lock my doors while sitting at a red light and a black man is near, but I sure as hell grab on tight to my wallet when any democrats are close by.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Re: Pedro Picasso could be wrong
« Reply #6 on: April 20, 2011, 02:43:52 PM »
Quote from: Mike220 on April 20, 2011, 02:33:53 PM
If I was a psychology student, I could make the DUmp the subject of one hell of a doctoral thesis. So many neuroses in one place...

Pedro Picasso was the youngest in his family, after an older brother and an older sister.

The older brother, similarly affluent, has common sense and remembered their mother on her 80th-or-so birthday by getting her a new computer.  Pedro Picasso didn't even send mom a happy-birthday card.

When Pedro Picasso was a little lad, he threw a temper-tantrum over something (perhaps being deprived watching half an hour of television), and his parents alas made the rather grotesque assessment that, "oh, he's one of these super-sensitive types, an artist, who's angry at the world."

And so that's the way Pedro Picasso was cultivated as he grew up, as one of these "sensitives" perpetually angry at the world.  He's always angry at the world because he's "sensitive," and supposed to be that way.

Actually, Pedro Picasso's a cloddish boor.
Logged
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline BlueStateSaint

  • Here I come to save the day, because I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32553
  • Reputation: +1560/-191
  • RIP FDNY Lt. Rich Nappi d. 4/16/12
Re: Pedro Picasso could be wrong
« Reply #7 on: April 20, 2011, 02:44:12 PM »
Quote from: Mike220 on April 20, 2011, 02:33:53 PM
If I was a psychology student, I could make the DUmp the subject of one hell of a doctoral thesis. So many neuroses in one place...

My wife said the same thing--about three years ago.  It's only gotten more "fruitful" since then.
Logged
"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

"All you have to do is look straight and see the road, and when you see it, don't sit looking at it - walk!" -Ayn Rand
 
"Those that trust God with their safety must yet use proper means for their safety, otherwise they tempt Him, and do not trust Him.  God will provide, but so must we also." - Matthew Henry, Commentary on 2 Chronicles 32, from Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible

"These anti-gun fools are more dangerous to liberty than street criminals or foreign spies."--Theodore Haas, Dachau Survivor

Chase her.
Chase her even when she's yours.
That's the only way you'll be assured to never lose her.

Offline Karin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17752
  • Reputation: +1895/-81
Re: Pedro Picasso could be wrong
« Reply #8 on: April 20, 2011, 02:44:52 PM »
I see peppered here and there at the DUmp, the mention of the name Grover Norquist.  It's like a hot button, or evil talisman, or something.  I think of him as just a guy who writes an occasional article for the Washington Times.  Why do they have a bug up the butt over Grover Norquist?  
Logged

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Re: Pedro Picasso could be wrong
« Reply #9 on: April 20, 2011, 06:00:47 PM »
Quote from: Karin on April 20, 2011, 02:44:52 PM
I see peppered here and there at the DUmp, the mention of the name Grover Norquist.  It's like a hot button, or evil talisman, or something.  I think of him as just a guy who writes an occasional article for the Washington Times.  Why do they have a bug up the butt over Grover Norquist?  

You got me, madam.

It's interesting how the primitives get hold of really obscure names, and turn them into something supernatural.

Who ever heard of the Koch Brothers, until Skins's island discovered them?

Or who's this Thom (sic) Hartmann guy?

Who was this famous vote-fraud researcher Walter A. Stephenson?

And so it goes.....it takes the primitives to make an obscurity famous.
Logged
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline USA4ME

  • Evil Capitalist
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14835
  • Reputation: +2476/-76
Re: Pedro Picasso could be wrong
« Reply #10 on: April 20, 2011, 07:00:00 PM »
Quote from:
Atman

Do you think this is far fetched?

Pedro, a certified kook, is asking a board full of certified kooks whether something is far fetched or not.  You really can't make up stuff any better than the non-sense they view as normal.

Poor Pedro.

.
Logged
Because third world peasant labor is a good thing.

Offline jukin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16237
  • Reputation: +2118/-170
Re: Pedro Picasso could be wrong
« Reply #11 on: April 20, 2011, 07:15:38 PM »
Yep, it's all the repuglicans. The $4,500,000,000.00 (FOUR AND ONE HALF BILLION DOLLARS) per day that B. Hussein Obama has deficit spent since cheating his way to president has nothing to do with the demise of the USA...NOTHING.
Logged
When you are the beneficiary of someone’s kindness and generosity, it produces a sense of gratitude and community.

When you are the beneficiary of a policy that steals from someone and gives it to you in return for your vote, it produces a sense of entitlement and dependency.

Offline true_blood

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6221
  • Reputation: +652/-817
Re: Pedro Picasso could be wrong
« Reply #12 on: April 20, 2011, 08:15:58 PM »
Quote
Atman  (1000+ posts)        Wed Apr-20-11 12:39 PM
PEDRO PICASSO
Original message
Why are the Republicans democrats being so brazen about their plans to dismantle America?
Fixed for DUche-baggery. :wink: :-)
(just to let the primitives know by "democrat" I mean, commie or socialist.)
Logged

Offline miskie

  • Mailman for the VRWC
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10461
  • Reputation: +1035/-54
  • Make America Great Again. Deport some DUmmies.
Re: Pedro Picasso could be wrong
« Reply #13 on: April 20, 2011, 10:09:18 PM »
You are wrong twice, Pedro.

Your theory is a made up fantasy - and the possibility that anything you typed is right (could be wrong) never existed.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »