Author Topic: kentuck admits OWS is a failure  (Read 2211 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online CC27

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6170
  • Reputation: +1760/-29
kentuck admits OWS is a failure
« on: October 14, 2011, 06:25:15 PM »
Quote
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Fri Oct-14-11 06:48 PM
Original message
OWS doesn't need leaders but they need leadership...
   
They don't have to have one leader but they need many leaders. Each leader could be in charge of a cell. A cell could consist of about 100 people or less. They should be able to coordinate information with each other. People need to know what is going on within the movement. New people could join the cell of their choice. They would only have to give their email address or ph# in order to stay informed. Without leadership or coordination, I fear they will lose the battle. Information is vital. We need many leaders. This is just my opinion.

My head hurts from reading that.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x2119031

Offline beefeater

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1326
  • Reputation: +130/-48
Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
« Reply #1 on: October 14, 2011, 06:44:09 PM »
My head hurts from reading that.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x2119031


Hey there kentuck, found your leader

[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSo-MEiMbac&feature=colike[/youtube]




My Old Man was a Chicago Republican until the day he died.

Then he became a democrat.

Offline BEG

  • "Mile Marker"
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17277
  • Reputation: +1062/-301
Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
« Reply #2 on: October 14, 2011, 06:48:30 PM »

Offline Duke Nukum

  • Assistant Chair of the Committee on Neighborhood Services
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8015
  • Reputation: +561/-202
  • O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
« Reply #3 on: October 14, 2011, 06:49:22 PM »
I thought Van Jones hit the nail on the head when he said we conservatives think individually and act collectively. Whereas the left somehow thinks collectively ( I have no idea how this is possible) and acts like dumbshits.

Well, he said something like that. That's the best I can remember it.
“A man who has been through bitter experiences and travelled far enjoys even his sufferings after a time”
― Homer, The Odyssey

Offline RWKindaGuy

  • Hiding in the hinterlands as a professional
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1020
  • Reputation: +33/-152
  • One giant rightward step for mankind
Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
« Reply #4 on: October 14, 2011, 06:57:09 PM »
Hey there kentuck, found your leader

[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSo-MEiMbac&feature=colike[/youtube]


I'm pretty sure I saw them crying about dead trees in another video ...  :loser:

Offline Ballygrl

  • Lipstick Renegade
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14934
  • Reputation: +983/-120
Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
« Reply #5 on: October 14, 2011, 07:26:03 PM »
Quote
"The nation that couldn’t be conquered by foreign enemies has been conquered by its elected officials" odawg Free Republic in reference to the GOP Elites who are no difference than the Democrats

Offline Doubleplusungood

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 609
  • Reputation: +38/-87
Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
« Reply #6 on: October 14, 2011, 07:54:06 PM »
Quote
They don't have to have one leader but they need many leaders. Each leader could be in charge of a cell. A cell could consist of about 100 people or less. They should be able to coordinate information with each other. People need to know what is going on within the movement. New people could join the cell of their choice. They would only have to give their email address or ph# in order to stay informed. Without leadership or coordination, I fear they will lose the battle. Information is vital. We need many leaders. This is just my opinion.

Jihadists use a similar organizational approach.

Offline Ballygrl

  • Lipstick Renegade
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14934
  • Reputation: +983/-120
Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
« Reply #7 on: October 14, 2011, 09:03:42 PM »
From Ann Coulter's Twitter :lmao:

Quote
AnnCoulter Ann Coulter
Occupy protest will have a "Mass March on Chase Bank” Saturday to close their accounts. Chase expected to lose well over $100.
Quote
"The nation that couldn’t be conquered by foreign enemies has been conquered by its elected officials" odawg Free Republic in reference to the GOP Elites who are no difference than the Democrats

Offline USA4ME

  • Evil Capitalist
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14835
  • Reputation: +2476/-76
Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
« Reply #8 on: October 14, 2011, 10:49:49 PM »
The bluegrass primitive's message will not be adopted by the OWSers on the ground.

They try so hard to tell Americans how things would be much better if they would just do what the primitives say, but no one cares to listen to a bunch of self-proclaimed know-it-alls that have proven to just be stupid.  Now, even the worthless dolts at OWS won't listen to them.

You'd almost feel sorry for them if you didn't know they have a track record of being ignored.

.
Because third world peasant labor is a good thing.

Offline miskie

  • Mailman for the VRWC
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10462
  • Reputation: +1035/-54
  • Make America Great Again. Deport some DUmmies.
Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
« Reply #9 on: October 15, 2011, 05:20:03 AM »
Jihadists use a similar organizational approach.

That was exactly my first thought upon reading that

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
« Reply #10 on: October 15, 2011, 09:20:45 AM »
I thought Van Jones hit the nail on the head when he said we conservatives think individually and act collectively. Whereas the left somehow thinks collectively ( I have no idea how this is possible) and acts like dumbshits.

Well, he said something like that. That's the best I can remember it.

I'm sure your take is more factually correct than his.  As far as how it's possible for them to do that, there's a good reason why some of us refer to DU as "The hive.:
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline GOBUCKS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24186
  • Reputation: +1812/-339
  • All in all, not bad, not bad at all
Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
« Reply #11 on: October 15, 2011, 07:14:32 PM »
I thought Van Jones hit the nail on the head when he said we conservatives think individually and act collectively.
Plugs Biden had the best take on that: "Who is Van Jones?"

Offline miskie

  • Mailman for the VRWC
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10462
  • Reputation: +1035/-54
  • Make America Great Again. Deport some DUmmies.
Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
« Reply #12 on: October 15, 2011, 07:42:53 PM »
I'm sure your take is more factually correct than his.  As far as how it's possible for them to do that, there's a good reason why some of us refer to DU as "The hive.:


Offline I_B_Perky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7532
  • Reputation: +721/-329
Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
« Reply #13 on: October 15, 2011, 11:07:36 PM »
Quote
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Fri Oct-14-11 06:48 PM
Original message
OWS doesn't need leaders but they need leadership...
   
They don't have to have one leader but they need many leaders. Each leader could be in charge of a cell. A cell could consist of about 100 people or less. They should be able to coordinate information with each other. People need to know what is going on within the movement. New people could join the cell of their choice. They would only have to give their email address or ph# in order to stay informed. Without leadership or coordination, I fear they will lose the battle. Information is vital. We need many leaders. This is just my opinion.

Well get off your ass and lead then, dumbass!!! Oh, I forgot who I was dealing with. Kinda hard to lead when ya all are too lazy to even support yourselves!!!







From Ann Coulter's Twitter :lmao:
AnnCoulter Ann Coulter
Occupy protest will have a "Mass March on Chase Bank” Saturday to close their accounts. Chase expected to lose well over $100.

Now that made me spew beer all over my monitor.

Living in the Dummies minds rent free since 2009!

Montani Semper Liberi

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
« Reply #14 on: October 16, 2011, 10:03:49 AM »
Jihadists use a similar organizational approach.

All underground organizations do, and have for a long time.  Except every single one of them does it better.  100 people in a cell?  Ridiculous.
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline AprilRazz

  • I love my...
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2705
  • Reputation: +202/-16
Re: kentuck admits OWS is a failure
« Reply #15 on: October 16, 2011, 11:01:45 AM »
The ones that Hannity had on his radio show the other day were a riot. None of them even had a real clue why they were there and how hypocritical they look. :rofl:
Proud Navy Wife and Veteran

"How a politician stands on the Second Amendment tells you how he or she views you as an individual... as a trustworthy and productive citizen, or as part of an unruly crowd that needs to be lorded over, controlled, supervised, and taken care of." Suzanna Hupp


racist – A statement of surrender during an argument. When two people or disputants are engaged in an acrimonious debate, the side that first says “Racist!” has conceded defeat. Synonymous with saying “Resign” during a chess game, or “Uncle” during a schoolyard fight. Ori