They spent an entire weekend whipping themselves into a frenzy while the rest of us were collecting facts.
Suddenly the week forces them into the sunlight and they are confronted by mounds of evidence:
LuckyTheDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Jan-11-11 08:49 PM
Original message
Gun site cross-hair images vs. bulls-eye images Updated at 9:12 PM
Bulls-eyes are no more violent than are the images found on thousands of discount stores and carnival games across America.
Gun site cross-hairs are very specific to the act of shooting.
Bulls-eyes are used for lots of non-violent reasons. Gun sites... not so much.
Just sayin'.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x175575The smell of desperation is beginning to emerge amid the wafting tendrils of hemp smoke and patchouli.
UPDATE: from the same thread:
Cid_B (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Jan-11-11 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's just pathetic...
Really? Is this where the conversation has degraded to?
The possible incitement value of multiple circles vs one circle with a cross?
Stupid crap like this is why the left loses arguments in the media.
ow...felt that one all the way over here
Waiting for Cid_B to be denounced as a RWer.