Welcome to The Conservative Cave©!Join in the discussion! Click HERE to register.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan-01-11 08:52 PMOriginal messageShouldn't they have gotten a puppy instead? Edited on Sat Jan-01-11 09:02 PM by GoneOffShorehttp://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/02/magazine/02babymaking...Story today in the NYT magazine about a couple who now have two children through the use of an egg donor - the Fairy Goddonor - two surrogates and multiple fertility treatments.All I could think of was "selfish" and "adoption".Mrs GoS and I have never wanted children so we don't get that impulse. We have adopted shelter cats and if we wanted a dog we would have gone the same way. Yes, I know that a puppy or a kitten is not a child, but still, why must one go to such extremes, spend so much money and go through the sturm und drang of finding donors, surrogates, etc, when adoption, even with the obstacles cited, is still an option?Probably better that the author of the piece didn't get a puppy, because she would have bought from a breeder rather than getting a shelter dog.
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan-01-11 09:01 PMResponse to Original message1. "Selfish" and "adoption" get my votes, too. n/t
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan-01-11 09:33 PMResponse to Original message6. Oh, God, not this judgmental shit again. Updated at 6:40 PM Edited on Sat Jan-01-11 09:33 PM by Warren DeMontagueJesus. Live your own ****ing life and make your own ****ing decisions. Don't presume to be placed on this Earth to sit in judgment of what other people do. ****.
How does the DUmp feel about Nadya "Octomom" Sullemen. I'm pretty sure her last name is spelled wrong, but you get the point.
They hate her. Say she is selfish, destroying the planet, blah blah blah.
Yeah, but she's on welfare and probably food stamps too. In Nancy Pelosi's perfect world, she is helping the economy.
Even though she is helping to boost the economy, she made the wrong choice by having all those kids and not having a doctor suck their brains out and throw the remains in the trash.I found this thread where they think she needs to pay back all the benefits from book deals etc.http://www.conservativecave.com/index.php/topic,22221.msg255553/highlight,nadya.html#msg255553
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts)Sat Jan-01-11 09:33 PMResponse to Original message6. Oh, God, not this judgmental shit again. Updated at 6:40 PM Edited on Sat Jan-01-11 09:33 PM by Warren DeMontagueJesus. Live your own ****ing life and make your own ****ing decisions. Don't presume to be placed on this Earth to sit in judgment of what other people do. ****.
Name removed (0 posts) Sat Jan-01-11 09:33 PMResponse to Original message6. Deleted message Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
"The nation that couldn’t be conquered by foreign enemies has been conquered by its elected officials" odawg Free Republic in reference to the GOP Elites who are no difference than the Democrats
What rule did they break?
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan-01-11 08:52 PMOriginal messageShouldn't they have gotten a puppy instead? Edited on Sat Jan-01-11 09:02 PM by GoneOffShorehttp://www.nytimes.com/20.../02/magazine/02babymaking...Story today in the NYT magazine about a gay couple who now have two children through the use of an egg donor - the Fairy Goddonor - two surrogates and multiple fertility treatments.All I could think of was "selfish" and "adoption".Mrs GoS and I have never wanted children so we don't get that impulse... blah blah blah blah blah...
Story today in the NYT magazine about a couple who now have two children through the use of an egg donor - the Fairy Goddonor - two surrogates and multiple fertility treatments.All I could think of was "selfish" and "adoption".
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan-01-11 08:52 PMOriginal messageShouldn't they have gotten a puppy instead?Edited on Sat Jan-01-11 09:02 PM by GoneOffShorehttp://www.nytimes.com/20.../02/magazine/02babymaking...Story today in the NYT magazine about a couple who now have two children through the use of an egg donor - the Fairy Goddonor - two surrogates and multiple fertility treatments.All I could think of was "selfish" and "adoption". Mrs GoS and I have never wanted children so we don't get that impulse. We have adopted shelter cats and if we wanted a dog we would have gone the same way. Yes, I know that a puppy or a kitten is not a child, but still, why must one go to such extremes, spend so much money and go through the sturm und drang of finding donors, surrogates, etc, when adoption, even with the obstacles cited, is still an option?Probably better that the author of the piece didn't get a puppy, because she would have bought from a breeder rather than getting a shelter dog.
Wow. This is what the DUmmies want to associate themselves with?
Probably better that the author of the piece didn't get a puppy, because she would have bought from a breeder rather than getting a shelter dog.
It's great when the DUmp's trailer park genes surface in print. It's just so much better to have a mongrel (we used to call them "alley dogs") than a purebred dog. Of course, a purebred dog is okay with democrat DUmmies if it's a slow greyhound or a cowardly pit bull. Rejects, just like the DUmmies.
