Send Us Hatemail ! mailbag@conservativecave.com
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
A Greenville, S.C., woman who filed a lawsuit against Victoria’s Secret saying that a defective bra seriously cut one of her breasts has submitted a new version of the suit correcting an error in the depth of the wound, Greenville Online reported.In the original lawsuit, Jessica Lang claimed a bra she bought at the mall “malfunctioned†and caused a cut in her chest and breast "nearly six inches wide and six inches deep." The new claim, filed Thursday, drastically changes that allegation to "3 inches long by 1/4 inch deep, resulting in scarring," Greenville Online reported.Lang’s attorney, Nathan Hughey, says the mistake was a result of a clerical error in a legal document when the lawsuit was originally filed in 2005. It has since been moved from state to federal court. Victoria’s Secret claims no wrongdoing in the alleged injury. They say Lang’s injuries were caused by her own negligence....
QuoteA Greenville, S.C., woman who filed a lawsuit against Victoria’s Secret saying that a defective bra seriously cut one of her breasts has submitted a new version of the suit correcting an error in the depth of the wound, Greenville Online reported.In the original lawsuit, Jessica Lang claimed a bra she bought at the mall “malfunctioned†and caused a cut in her chest and breast "nearly six inches wide and six inches deep." The new claim, filed Thursday, drastically changes that allegation to "3 inches long by 1/4 inch deep, resulting in scarring," Greenville Online reported.Lang’s attorney, Nathan Hughey, says the mistake was a result of a clerical error in a legal document when the lawsuit was originally filed in 2005. It has since been moved from state to federal court. Victoria’s Secret claims no wrongdoing in the alleged injury. They say Lang’s injuries were caused by her own negligence....linkJust to prove I have no bias against men in my mutilation stories.
Quote from: bijou on April 04, 2008, 04:38:32 PMQuoteA Greenville, S.C., woman who filed a lawsuit against Victoria’s Secret saying that a defective bra seriously cut one of her breasts has submitted a new version of the suit correcting an error in the depth of the wound, Greenville Online reported.In the original lawsuit, Jessica Lang claimed a bra she bought at the mall “malfunctioned†and caused a cut in her chest and breast "nearly six inches wide and six inches deep." The new claim, filed Thursday, drastically changes that allegation to "3 inches long by 1/4 inch deep, resulting in scarring," Greenville Online reported.Lang’s attorney, Nathan Hughey, says the mistake was a result of a clerical error in a legal document when the lawsuit was originally filed in 2005. It has since been moved from state to federal court. Victoria’s Secret claims no wrongdoing in the alleged injury. They say Lang’s injuries were caused by her own negligence....linkJust to prove I have no bias against men in my mutilation stories. Wardrobe malfunction??? I beileve her case lacks support.
Quote from: lug-nut on April 04, 2008, 04:43:08 PMQuote from: bijou on April 04, 2008, 04:38:32 PMQuoteA Greenville, S.C., woman who filed a lawsuit against Victoria’s Secret saying that a defective bra seriously cut one of her breasts has submitted a new version of the suit correcting an error in the depth of the wound, Greenville Online reported.In the original lawsuit, Jessica Lang claimed a bra she bought at the mall “malfunctioned†and caused a cut in her chest and breast "nearly six inches wide and six inches deep." The new claim, filed Thursday, drastically changes that allegation to "3 inches long by 1/4 inch deep, resulting in scarring," Greenville Online reported.Lang’s attorney, Nathan Hughey, says the mistake was a result of a clerical error in a legal document when the lawsuit was originally filed in 2005. It has since been moved from state to federal court. Victoria’s Secret claims no wrongdoing in the alleged injury. They say Lang’s injuries were caused by her own negligence....linkJust to prove I have no bias against men in my mutilation stories. Wardrobe malfunction??? I beileve her case lacks support. I'm sure her lawyer can pad out the evidence for her.
Quote from: bijou on April 04, 2008, 05:16:09 PMQuote from: lug-nut on April 04, 2008, 04:43:08 PMQuote from: bijou on April 04, 2008, 04:38:32 PMQuoteA Greenville, S.C., woman who filed a lawsuit against Victoria’s Secret saying that a defective bra seriously cut one of her breasts has submitted a new version of the suit correcting an error in the depth of the wound, Greenville Online reported.In the original lawsuit, Jessica Lang claimed a bra she bought at the mall “malfunctioned†and caused a cut in her chest and breast "nearly six inches wide and six inches deep." The new claim, filed Thursday, drastically changes that allegation to "3 inches long by 1/4 inch deep, resulting in scarring," Greenville Online reported.Lang’s attorney, Nathan Hughey, says the mistake was a result of a clerical error in a legal document when the lawsuit was originally filed in 2005. It has since been moved from state to federal court. Victoria’s Secret claims no wrongdoing in the alleged injury. They say Lang’s injuries were caused by her own negligence....linkJust to prove I have no bias against men in my mutilation stories. Wardrobe malfunction??? I beileve her case lacks support. I'm sure her lawyer can pad out the evidence for her. Is she strapped for cash?
what have you got to be doing to cause a six inch wide gash . . . . with a bra?
Quote from: Wretched Excess on April 04, 2008, 06:01:54 PMwhat have you got to be doing to cause a six inch wide gash . . . . with a bra? Underwiring gone awry probably.
Quote from: bijou on April 04, 2008, 06:04:05 PMQuote from: Wretched Excess on April 04, 2008, 06:01:54 PMwhat have you got to be doing to cause a six inch wide gash . . . . with a bra? Underwiring gone awry probably. I wasn't speaking about the specific means of injury, but, c'mon, a gash that big? something unusualhad to be happening in the first place. that was my point.
Quote from: Wretched Excess on April 04, 2008, 06:11:34 PMQuote from: bijou on April 04, 2008, 06:04:05 PMQuote from: Wretched Excess on April 04, 2008, 06:01:54 PMwhat have you got to be doing to cause a six inch wide gash . . . . with a bra? Underwiring gone awry probably. I wasn't speaking about the specific means of injury, but, c'mon, a gash that big? something unusualhad to be happening in the first place. that was my point. In the end it was only three inches. (I will resist the obvious there.) I am skeptical though, I can't imagine a bra causing even that much damage.
Wardrobe malfunction.
Well they do make crappy bras. They are cheap, flimsy pieces of crap and way overpriced. There, that's a woman weighing in. They say some bras lift and separate, some of us need ones that divide and conquer. VS bras don't do that .