« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Ethics Panel Finds Rangel Guilty on 11 Violations of House Rules  (Read 5533 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline NHSparky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24431
  • Reputation: +1280/-617
  • Where are you going? I was gonna make espresso!
Re: Ethics Panel Finds Rangel Guilty on 11 Violations of House Rules
« Reply #25 on: December 03, 2010, 08:13:29 AM »
I'm too lazy/busy to look it up and post it this morning.  There were actually TWO votes regarding the Rangel censure.  Anyone got the time to find them in Thomas.loc and link them here?  I'm curious to see how my soon-to-be-ex-moonbatcritter voted on both of those.
Logged
“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.”  -Henry Ford

Offline Mike220

  • Proud owner of a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4650
  • Reputation: +310/-122
  • Ron Swanson is my hero
Re: Ethics Panel Finds Rangel Guilty on 11 Violations of House Rules
« Reply #26 on: December 03, 2010, 08:49:30 AM »
Quote from: NHSparky on December 03, 2010, 08:13:29 AM
I'm too lazy/busy to look it up and post it this morning.  There were actually TWO votes regarding the Rangel censure.  Anyone got the time to find them in Thomas.loc and link them here?  I'm curious to see how my soon-to-be-ex-moonbatcritter voted on both of those.

She voted against the amendment to change the censure to a reprimand.

Roll 606

She voted for the censure.

Roll 607
Logged
Blackmail is such an ugly word. I prefer "extortion." The "X" makes it sound cool. - Bender

"jews run the media" -- CreativeChristie
Woohoo! Bow to me peasants -- Me

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: Ethics Panel Finds Rangel Guilty on 11 Violations of House Rules
« Reply #27 on: December 03, 2010, 08:53:16 AM »
Quote from: NHSparky on December 03, 2010, 08:13:29 AM
I'm too lazy/busy to look it up and post it this morning.  There were actually TWO votes regarding the Rangel censure.  Anyone got the time to find them in Thomas.loc and link them here?  I'm curious to see how my soon-to-be-ex-moonbatcritter voted on both of those.
There was the censure vote itself and an amendment to reduce the punishment from censure to reprimand.  The link to the censure vote doesn't seem to be working.

H.RES.1737
Title: In the matter of Representative Charles B. Rangel.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d111:2:./temp/~bdsbgA::|/home/LegislativeData.php|

H.AMDT.784 (A001)
Amends: H.RES.1737
Sponsor: Rep Butterfield, G. K. [NC-1] (offered 12/2/2010)
AMENDMENT PURPOSE:
An amendment to change the recommendation of censure contained in the resoluttion to that of reprimand.
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2010/roll606.xml
Logged
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline NHSparky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24431
  • Reputation: +1280/-617
  • Where are you going? I was gonna make espresso!
Re: Ethics Panel Finds Rangel Guilty on 11 Violations of House Rules
« Reply #28 on: December 03, 2010, 11:52:17 AM »
Holy smokes--she actually voted to censure him?  After all that money he gave her?

Guess she has a conscience after all.  Too bad she discovered it just a bit too late.
Logged
“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.”  -Henry Ford
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »