Author Topic: Supreme Court to hear Snyder v. Phelps  (Read 970 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Supreme Court to hear Snyder v. Phelps
« on: September 30, 2010, 05:29:59 PM »
Quote
Big cases await U.S. Supreme Court's 2010-2011 term

Outlined below are some key cases the Supreme Court is scheduled to tackle in its 2010-11 term, which starts Monday.

Roughly 52 appeals are currently on the high court's schedule, and more cases will be added to its docket. About another two dozen are expected to be added in coming months.

The father of a U.S. soldier killed in Iraq sued after members of the Topeka-based Westboro Baptist Church conducted an angry demonstration at his son's burial service. The family of the Marine won a $5 million judgment from the protesters. The ruling, however, was later overturned by a federal appeals court, which said the protest did not directly refer to the lance corporal, and were therefore protected speech on an issue of national debate.

The court's ruling could set new guidelines on a broad range of speech-related events, including protests. Several states have attempted to impose specific limits on when and where the church can protest. The justices may be asked to address how far states and private entities like cemeteries and churches can go to justify policies meant to silence or restrict demonstrators exercising their constitutional rights in a funeral setting.

CNN
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23556
  • Reputation: +2479/-270
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
Re: Supreme Court to hear Snyder v. Phelps
« Reply #1 on: September 30, 2010, 05:34:31 PM »
What I expect to see:

Quote
While the court recognizes the inviolable right of the WBBC to exercise its first amendment rights it is with equally fierce protection of inalienable rights that we admit the appellate may, with regards to such members of the WBBC as he deems fitting, kick them in their festering bitch sockets.
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."

Offline Airwolf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12160
  • Reputation: +912/-163
Re: Supreme Court to hear Snyder v. Phelps
« Reply #2 on: September 30, 2010, 06:00:11 PM »
It will be a great thing if the SCOTUS reams the WBBC a new one.
MOLON LABE

"Someday, when all your civilization and science are likewise swept away, your kind will pray for a man with a sword."-- Conan the Barbarian

Clint Eastwood - Because God wanted Chuck Norris to have nightmares.

"I am not a Number,I am a free man"

"He's my hero, you don't put away your heros, you honor them!"

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: Supreme Court to hear Snyder v. Phelps
« Reply #3 on: September 30, 2010, 06:04:04 PM »
With 'the Wise Latina' and 'No Judicial Experience Needed' Kagan on the bench, I'm not so sure where it will go.
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.