Our Constitution supposedly operates with the "consent of the governed".
According to our Constitution, there is only ONE way to make law in this country - that is in the Congress - the elected representatives of the People.
The sovereign, is the person who makes the law. In the old days, the King said "I declare...", and whatever followed, became the law.
In this country, the People are sovereign. We are the only ones who can make the law. We do that via our elected representatives. In doing so, we give them a Power of Attorney to act on our behalf.
Congress, unfortunately, has re-delegated a big chunk of its law-making authority to the Executive Branch. This is "administrative law" - it is created by Executive Branch "administrators". Congress has, in effect, transferred our Power of Attorney to a third party - without our consent.
Recently, there has been the rise of a movement that calls itself the Sovereign movement. These are people who say "I do not consent to be governed" - at least, not in this way.
They consider that re-delegating law-making authority, and transferring the Power of Attorney without consent, is equivalent to a drunken gambler who is completely broke, using that Power of Attorney in a wager, and then losing it.
How much do you know about the Sovereigns? Anything? Would you like to find out? Seems to me, conservatives ought to be very interested in this movement. These people have a lot to offer - especially when it comes to legal mechanisms for protecting our Natural Rights against abuses of power by the government.