There are actually some possible good consequences to this, because I believe it would allow member nations or regional organizations to go after groups that sponsor it without further UN action, the same as genocide. Of course that depends on the testosterone level of the actors involved, but it takes it out of the UN Security Council veto deadlock or bogging down with surrogates and co-religionists of the bombers in the General Assembly, which paralyze action against any particular identified single group of bombers at the UN level.
It's awfully hard to avoid turning 'Ban Ki-moon' into something ending with 'Ka-boom' when reading this, I have to say.
