Author Topic: doctoring primitive starts discusson on wronged woman  (Read 2821 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
doctoring primitive starts discusson on wronged woman
« on: April 21, 2009, 01:36:54 PM »
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=301x610

Oh my.

This hasn't attracted much attention yet from the primitives.

Quote
The Doctor.  (1000+ posts)        Mon Apr-20-09 03:24 PM
Original message
 
Is this woman in the wrong?

This was an issue that came up between a couple that I work with on occasion. No identifying details are included, of course. After having the issue related to me, and looking, for myself, at the police report, I thought it would be interesting to get the opinions of our progressive community on this subject.

It unfolded as follows;

It's been nearly a year since she and her husband have been 'intimate'. Partly because she feels unworthy, overweight, and useless, and partly because he doesn't communicate with her even though she sometimes begs him to tell her what he wants, needs, or feels.

He works four nights a week, steadily, as a bartender making good money, but not enough to keep up for the family. He is a loving father.

She tried to start a business that might have been very lucrative and could have even supported the whole family, but it failed before it even started because the man she was buying the equipment from reneged on the deal he'd made with her. By the time she'd found that her cause was actionable, her investment dried up, and from there she sank into a black depression.

One morning her husband comes home after work. On occasion, he is fairly drunk on arrival. Those times are actually special to her, and she often waits up all hours just to be there when he arrives because he is sometimes talkative and reflective, and sometimes even a little affectionate.

This was one such morning.

He told her, as he often did in his state, many soothing, hopeful things. He apologized for not being better for her, and they watched TV for an hour before he went to bed.

Still glowing from the rare succor, she went upstairs a few minutes later. She put her arms around him, touched him, and tried to recapture, after so much time, a little intimacy with the man she'd pledged her life to. He threw her off without a word.

Frustrated, she went to take out the garbage, but couldn't find one of her shoes. Ostensibly, it became one of her young children's playthings.
In her frustration, she slammed a door while looking for the shoe in her own bedroom.

Her husband, without a word, got up, put the children in the car, and... still drunk... tried to drive away.

She got into the car and asked what he was doing. He yelled at her to "get out". She took the keys and went back into the house with the children. She pleaded with him to tell her what was wrong, she wanted to simply TALK about her frustration and his reaction. She wanted to work things out, but he persisted in trying to leave. She called the police, and took his phone while still hoping that he would talk to her instead of calling a friend or family member to take the children and he away.

He never said a word about the issue, instead he just demanded to have his phone and the car keys back.

The police arrived, and the parties, separated, explained what happened.

She explained that she called because her husband tried to drive away drunk with the children in the car over a slammed door.

He told the police that yes, he had been drinking, but because she acted violently on the house, he felt he had to get the children out of the house.

____________

Now... I have spoken to both parties, I have seen the police report which reflects the details as related. Every detail herein is verified to more than my satisfaction.

It is the woman who is listed as the 'suspect', and the husband who is listed as the 'victim' on the police report.

If anyone would like to explain why the report is right or wrong, why she was in the right or the wrong, I'd be most interested to hear it. Naturally, I must maintain an objective attitude, but I'm curious as to just why she should be listed as the suspect and he the victim.

There is another purpose here as well, which I will illustrate later.

Quote
elleng  (1000+ posts)       Mon Apr-20-09 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
 
1. Police arrived at point when they couldn't tell who was what, and I can't quite figure out why they wrote what. They might have discerned that he had been drinking. EVERYONE's a victim, if properly understood. COPS erred, imo, by labelling at all.
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline The Village Idiot

  • Banned
  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 54
  • Reputation: +96/-15
Re: doctoring primitive starts discusson on wronged woman
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2009, 01:52:00 PM »
well she did slam the door, violence against a house.... is it a gay house?? That makes it a hate crime

Offline Tantal

  • Right Wing Hardliner
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1155
  • Reputation: +106/-15
Re: doctoring primitive starts discusson on wronged woman
« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2009, 02:33:19 PM »
What the primitive is referring is called an "Incident Report", rather than an "Offense Report". There was no crime committed, nobody went to jail, therefore, there are no "suspects" or "victims". Not sure exactly what the case was, but, generally, whomever actually calls the police is generally referred to as the "complainant" and anyone else is referred to "person contacted". Since there is no criminal case here, I'm wondering what this primitive is bitching about......aside from attempting to stir up dislike for the police?
Never demand that which you are incapable of taking by force, DUmmie.

Offline Wineslob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14480
  • Reputation: +816/-193
  • Sucking the life out of Liberty
Re: doctoring primitive starts discusson on wronged woman
« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2009, 04:10:07 PM »
Quote
The Doctor.

Quote
couple that I work with on occasion

I woulden't want you for a Doctor (if indeed you are/doubtful), blabbing your mouth off about the private issues of your patients...................on the damn Internet.
“The national budget must be balanced. The public debt must be reduced; the arrogance of the authorities must be moderated and controlled. Payments to foreign governments must be reduced, if the nation doesn't want to go bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance.”

        -- Marcus Tullius Cicero, 55 BC (106-43 BC)

The unobtainable is unknown at Zombo.com



"Practice random violence and senseless acts of brutality"

If you want a gender neutral bathroom, go pee in the forest.

Offline Traveshamockery

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4391
  • Reputation: +373/-54
  • Nana to Kyle and Garrett
Re: doctoring primitive starts discusson on wronged woman
« Reply #4 on: April 21, 2009, 04:45:23 PM »
DU AdBot comes through again!     

Quote
*
      Should You Get A Divorce?
      Answer These 10 Questions. The Hottest Relationship Advice!
      www.LifeScript.com
    *
      Feeling Stuck?
      Depression effects us all. There is a way out, come see. In Arcadia, CA
      www.soultenders.com
    *
      How to Fix Your Marriage
      Get Free Marriage Help Immediately. New Alternative to Counseling.
      www.MarriageMax.com


 :lmao:

Offline Vagabond

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2478
  • Reputation: +166/-52
Re: doctoring primitive starts discusson on wronged woman
« Reply #5 on: April 22, 2009, 02:04:11 AM »
There is something here, I can't quite place....This primitive knows in detail that the husband and wife haven't had relations in a year.  It also knows the motivation of the woman who is not having intercourse, which is the usual litany the woman feels overweight, unworthy, useless, and her husband won't communicate with her.  Almost the entire post deals with the perspective of the woman. 

She gets to feeling frisky, yet her husband who had probably just dropped off to sleep pulls back from being intimate.  This is understandable, they haven't had sex in a long time.  I can almost bet you he went through a period of practically begging for sex and tired of the refusals.  By now, he is probably bitter over it.

She gets frustrated and starts slamming doors.  Notice the husbands reaction is to get the kids out, immediately.  In other words, this isn't the first time she has acted this way.

She refuses to allow him to leave.  She had already mentioned he had come home from work a little inebriated, but that didn't bother her.  The fact that he attempted to get away with the kids after some time had passed suddenly became a problem.  In fact, she calls the police in an attempt to get him arrested for drunk and disorderly if not drunk driving.

With the information posted, I believe it is reasonable to assume that the original poster is likely the wife in this story.
There comes a time when even good men must run up the black flag of anarchy and slit throats. - H.L. Mencken

Offline The Village Idiot

  • Banned
  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 54
  • Reputation: +96/-15
Re: doctoring primitive starts discusson on wronged woman
« Reply #6 on: April 22, 2009, 03:37:11 AM »
Is that what your crystal ball says?? Mine hasn't worked for ages, probably needs more batteries.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Re: doctoring primitive starts discusson on wronged woman
« Reply #7 on: April 22, 2009, 04:59:18 AM »
Is that what your crystal ball says?? Mine hasn't worked for ages, probably needs more batteries.

I agree with vagabond, sort of.

The doctoring primitive's been around a while.

It probably isn't the wife in the "report" starting the original bonfire, but the doctoring primitive most assuredly knows only one side of the story, the wife's.
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline formerlurker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9692
  • Reputation: +802/-833
Re: doctoring primitive starts discusson on wronged woman
« Reply #8 on: April 22, 2009, 06:37:36 AM »
There is something here, I can't quite place....This primitive knows in detail that the husband and wife haven't had relations in a year.  It also knows the motivation of the woman who is not having intercourse, which is the usual litany the woman feels overweight, unworthy, useless, and her husband won't communicate with her.  Almost the entire post deals with the perspective of the woman. 

She gets to feeling frisky, yet her husband who had probably just dropped off to sleep pulls back from being intimate.  This is understandable, they haven't had sex in a long time.  I can almost bet you he went through a period of practically begging for sex and tired of the refusals.  By now, he is probably bitter over it.

She gets frustrated and starts slamming doors.  Notice the husbands reaction is to get the kids out, immediately.  In other words, this isn't the first time she has acted this way.

She refuses to allow him to leave.  She had already mentioned he had come home from work a little inebriated, but that didn't bother her.  The fact that he attempted to get away with the kids after some time had passed suddenly became a problem.  In fact, she calls the police in an attempt to get him arrested for drunk and disorderly if not drunk driving.

With the information posted, I believe it is reasonable to assume that the original poster is likely the wife in this story.

That is exactly what I was thinking also.  She is "the doctor."

Offline Toastedturningtidelegs

  • Holy Crap! Look at my
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3759
  • Reputation: +218/-69
  • OBAMA PHONE!
Re: doctoring primitive starts discusson on wronged woman
« Reply #9 on: April 22, 2009, 06:44:42 AM »
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=301x610

Oh my.

This hasn't attracted much attention yet from the primitives.

Why do I get the feeling this is autobiographical? :-)
Call me "Asshole" One more time!