Decline HillaryCare? Suffer An 'Outcome'

[Attero Dominatus]

Decline HillaryCare? Suffer An 'Outcome'
Photo of Mark Finkelstein.
By Mark Finkelstein | February 15, 2008 - 21:35 ET

You vill obey update . . .

The domestic policy differences between Hillary and Obama are negligible. But the Clinton camp likes to claim that his national health care plan would leave 15 million people out, whereas hers covers everyone. Let's put aside for the moment the fact that former Clinton cabinet member Robert Reich says the Obama plan would actually wind up covering more people. The key to Hillary's claim that she would cover everyone is that . . . she would punish people who refuse to fall in line.

Naturally, Clinton isn't eager to specify just what such punishment would be. But under intense questioning by Tucker Carlson on his MSNBC show this evening, senior Clinton advisor Kiki McLean coined an Orwellian euphemism. People who didn't obey wouldn't be punished. They would simply incur an . . . "outcome."

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2008/02/15/decline-hillarycare-suffer-outcome

[ToastedRachel]

I went a bunch of years without healthcare in my 20s because I just didn't want it. I had a great job and they offered the benefits, but I hate doctors and don't go. I only pay for it now cause of the baby.

Let them try and tell kids who are just out of college that they will have their wages garnished. 

[Attero Dominatus]

I went a bunch of years without healthcare in my 20s because I just didn't want it. I had a great job and they offered the benefits, but I hate doctors and don't go. I only pay for it now cause of the baby.

Let them try and tell kids who are just out of college that they will have their wages garnished. 

I do not enjoy going to doctors and hospitals either.

I think she was meaning worse punishments for refusing her "care." Such as jail time. She did not say specifically. Whatever the case, she is evil.