Author Topic: The Cost of Media Bias  (Read 1201 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DixieBelle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12143
  • Reputation: +512/-49
  • Still looking for my pony.....
The Cost of Media Bias
« on: April 18, 2009, 01:01:20 PM »
A must see!

http://www.pjtv.com/video/Afterburner_/The_Cost_of_Media_Bias/1736/6337/

 :cheersmate:

edited to add funny postscript -  :evillaugh:

CNN's Susan Roesgen went nuts on the air Wednesday at a Chicago tea party, blaming everything (accurately) on Fox News. But maybe she was angry because Fox turned her down for a job—twice!

Roesgen got snippy with a crazy interviewee while trying to cover the tea partiers, and the crowd turned on her. "I think you get the general tenor of this," she said. "It's anti-government, anti-CNN since this is highly promoted by the right-wing conservative network Fox."

Back in 2005, though, according to a Fox News source, Roesgen really wanted to work for that right-wing conservative network. She sent a tape of her on-air work to Fox's then-programming chief Kevin Magee in January 2005, and followed up with another reel to Magee's successor Bill Shine in September 2005. Needless to say, she didn't get the gig.
http://gawker.com/5216313/fox+bashing-cnn-reporter-applied-for-a-job-at-fox
« Last Edit: April 18, 2009, 01:08:31 PM by DixieBelle »
I can see November 2 from my house!!!

Spread my work ethic, not my wealth.

Forget change, bring back common sense.
-------------------------------------------------

No, my friends, there’s only one really progressive idea. And that is the idea of legally limiting the power of the government. That one genuinely liberal, genuinely progressive idea — the Why in 1776, the How in 1787 — is what needs to be conserved. We need to conserve that fundamentally liberal idea. That is why we are conservatives. --Bill Whittle

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Re: The Cost of Media Bias
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2009, 01:19:07 PM »
I believe without a doubt that the media gave the presidency to 0Bama. However, I'm not convinced that McCain  would be president without that bias.  I think Hillary would have been the Dems nominee, and that the race would have been more of a toss up between McCain and Hillary.  They were pretty much 2 sides of the same coin.