I agree she's not realistic about what she's expending versus taking in, but I don't think she's bsing on sizes. She is probably well proportioned so a very TIGHT size 16 at 200 lbs for her height sounds about right. People with apple shapes really can't judge gal with a good hourglass or pear shaped--they just will not fit into the same size at the same weight, even if they are both doing the same amount of working out. The shape makes a huge difference into what you can fit into.
Oh, I agree, when women are toned, they can weigh more and wear smaller sizes, but I am working off the assumption she is NOT. Maybe, but if she is not burning any weight, I find it hard to believe she is toned. I am very curvy, definately hourglass, and weigh in about 125-135, depending on if I have gained way too much. I need to tone up again, I usually lose at least 10 lbs. after about a month. On the size thing, I was working off my knowledge of dressing women in their 40's, 50's, and 60's. I know I couldn't get any of them in anything near the sizes she is talking about, and I worked in a pretty upscale little boutique, and sizes ran larger. Maybe she is lucky, who knows. I tend to think she is not being realistic about anything she posted, and that is not really unusual. Does anyone really want to look at their bad habits and then announce them to all their buddies? Especially one of the DUmmies? As Cindie says here, they lie, a lot.
