I never understood this whole BS thing anyway. Everyone agrees that the US Attorneys serve at the pleasure of the President. Therefore it seems likely that any firing of them could be construed as political. Why aren't we calling for Clinton's gang to be hauled before congress. He fired and replaced more than Bush did.
I agree completely. However, while the legal arguments remain the same, the Administration's willingness to assert them on Rove's behalf has turned a 180, ditto the leadership (or at least its own professional best interests) at DOJ and the Solicitor General's office. Unless the new administration wants to back his play (since they might need to claim it themselves sometime in the next four to eight years, if not for the next two years) at this point he might be better off just to squeeze the Obamites into formally contravening the Bush administration's position, then showing up and having as much fun with Conyers and his goobers as possible, secure in the knowledge that the more enraged Conyers gets the more it is going to screw the Obama administration in the long run.