Author Topic: How about this rule for government efficiency?  (Read 439 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23480
  • Reputation: +2453/-270
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
How about this rule for government efficiency?
« on: February 19, 2025, 11:02:14 AM »
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220047771

Quote
Pototan (2,326 posts)
Wed Feb 19, 2025, 11:52 AM
1
Recommend
How about this rule for government efficiency?
Each state will be capped in receiving federal money to the state and its citizens in the current fiscal year at the rate the state produced federal revenue to the US treasury in the previous fiscal year.

Which states do you think would be ****ed by this rule?

Why bother sending it to the feds in the first lace just to wash it through the bureaucracy?
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29235
  • Reputation: +3203/-248
Re: How about this rule for government efficiency?
« Reply #1 on: February 19, 2025, 11:17:29 AM »
So, ignore actual need and utility?
If The Vaccine is deadly as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, millions now living would have died.

Offline DUmpDiver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1915
  • Reputation: +850/-5
Re: How about this rule for government efficiency?
« Reply #2 on: February 19, 2025, 11:26:34 AM »
Shouldn't richer states have to pay their "fair share?"

Citizens in those states should have to pay a higher tax rate.

/Dummie mode

Offline Texacon

  • Super
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13021
  • Reputation: +1661/-55
  • All The Way!
Re: How about this rule for government efficiency?
« Reply #3 on: February 19, 2025, 12:36:36 PM »
I don't think that plan would go the way the DUmmie thinks.  They think all the blue states pay more to the fed gov't.  They're wrong.

CA would definitely be in trouble.  CA is NOT the maker state they think it is and last I checked it was on the taker list.

KC
  Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day.  Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life.

*Stolen

Online jukin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16203
  • Reputation: +2096/-170
Re: How about this rule for government efficiency?
« Reply #4 on: February 19, 2025, 01:45:38 PM »
Quote
Which states do you think would be ****ed by this rule?

I know that California would be and hard. California gets more in welfare and medicaid than Florida or Texas does in total from the feds. So your DUmbass DUmb idea is, get this, really DUmb.
When you are the beneficiary of someone’s kindness and generosity, it produces a sense of gratitude and community.

When you are the beneficiary of a policy that steals from someone and gives it to you in return for your vote, it produces a sense of entitlement and dependency.