That poor moron's math doesn't hold together. Even taking the whole alleged proposal at face value, the $5,000/$7,000 split would mean the
participants had to come up with the $7,000, and the "Credit" would be funded by taxes, or in effect a $5,000 tax increase....however the $5,000 "tax increase" would be multiplied by the number of participants, not the entire taxpaying population, so the real number is much softer.
