Author Topic: Has the Supreme Court become "radicalized" ?  (Read 863 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dutch508

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12576
  • Reputation: +1729/-1068
  • Remember
Has the Supreme Court become "radicalized" ?
« on: December 13, 2021, 08:49:25 AM »
Quote
kentuck (103,717 posts)
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216139717

Has the Supreme Court become "radicalized" ?

Are the majority now part of the cult?

Although the decision about Trump's "executive privilege" should be cut and dried, is this Court far-enough removed from politics to make a rational decision?

I have my doubts.

The power of the "cult" is over-whelming in the Republican Party and the Court has already shown that they are ready to play Republican politics if it is the right issue.

Perhaps it is a thought we should not entertain? They are not insane. Surely they will not open a can of worms that will smell all the way to Moscow?

 :thatsright:

Quote
Star Member gab13by13 (5,933 posts)

1. American oligarchs fund

radical organizations like the Federalist Society and they choose the SC justices. (Republican chosen justices)

If I were forced to bet I am betting that the SC will not take up the executive privilege case. I am willing to bet 1 dollar to the charity of choice. I still believe that Chief Justice Roberts can twist a couple of arms to not take the case. Roberts is a person who is concerned about his legacy and if the court delays long enough or sides with Trump, Robert's court will have been a doorway that led us into autocracy.

Quote
kentuck (103,717 posts)

2. In my opinion...

Last edited Mon Dec 13, 2021, 09:28 AM - Edit history (1)

Alito may be the strongest "cultist", with Thomas a close second. Kavanaugh would probably go along with them. Amy Coney Barrett could go either way, in my view. Gorsuch and Roberts lean more to the protection of our Constitution, in my opinion.

Quote
Star Member lark (19,661 posts)

3. I don't know how you can conclude that, given their approval of the Texas scheme.

If they were regular legal folks, they would have enjoined Texas from implementing this extreme scheme, but they let it stand. That tells you all you need to know about their intentions. They are firebombers and are out to destroy us, while pretending to be reasonable and rational but going full on Confederalist on us. They want a fascist right wing nation, but want to pretend they aren't rabid corporatists/confederalists/white nationalists when they are, 100% for the felonious six. I call them that because of their wanted constitutional destruction in favor or religion and big business and against the working class/poor.

Quote
Star Member gab13by13 (5,933 posts)

6. I agree 100% with your post,

I may be wrong that Roberts can sway these partisan justices and the Texas abortion fiasco decision cuts deeply into my argument. Robert's court took a big hit for the court not staying the Texas law so I guess my argument is does Roberts care if his court takes another hit in ruling in favor of Trump's executive immunity? Maybe I am wrong about Roberts, maybe he is no different than Clarence Thomas.

Quote
Star Member lark (19,661 posts)

7. I think Roberts has almost zero control over the firebombers.

Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavarape and Handmaiden have made their entire lives about owning the libs and pushing right wing, religious, misogynistic and corporatist schemes and ignoring all laws they don't like. They don't give a shit about Roberts or the law, they just have a point of view that they are pushing and that's what they care about. They also don't like being called out, because they know they are in he process of destroying us and trying to pretend everythings' normal - but it is not and getting worse - by their designs.

 :mental:
The torch of moral clarity since 12/18/07

2016 DOTY: 06 Omaha Steve - Is dying for ****'s face! How could you not vote for him, you heartless bastards!?!

Offline DLR Pyro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9371
  • Reputation: +1547/-29
Re: Has the Supreme Court become "radicalized" ?
« Reply #1 on: December 13, 2021, 08:52:10 AM »
Quote
Star Member gab13by13 (5,933 posts)

1. American oligarchs fund

radical organizations like the Federalist Society and they choose the SC justices.

george soros says hello
Biden is an illegitimate President.  Change my mind.

Police lives matter.

Basking in the glow of my white privilege

ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Wed Mar-09-11 08:50 PM
64.I'd almost be willing to get a job in order to participate in
A NATIONAL GENERAL STRIKE
  https://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4763020

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29362
  • Reputation: +3236/-248
Re: Has the Supreme Court become "radicalized" ?
« Reply #2 on: December 13, 2021, 09:16:25 AM »
Wow! kt is going full-loon over the USSC. Poor baby.
If The Vaccine is deadly as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, millions now living would have died.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Re: Has the Supreme Court become "radicalized" ?
« Reply #3 on: December 13, 2021, 01:58:59 PM »
The Supreme Court has been radicalized since the tenure of Earl Warren in the early 1950s.  It swung left and never looked back.
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."