Author Topic: Will Republicans be able to get 50 votes for SC nominee before the election?  (Read 1834 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dutch508

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12577
  • Reputation: +1731/-1068
  • Remember
Quote
Star Member kentuck (99,336 posts)
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100214109774

Will Republicans be able to get 50 votes for SC nominee before the election?

I rather doubt it. It is just too much of a gamble for Republican Senators running in tight races. They do not need the extra burden of explaining their lies to their voters.

They operate in their own self-interests. Many, in my opinion, have concluded that it is better for them politically if they wait until after the election. They do not want to gamble at this point in their races.

Trump and McConnell may not like it but senators in tight races are not ready to sacrifice their careers for Donald Trump at this time.

They, unlike Collins and Murkowski, will choose to keep it quiet behind the scenes. If Trump has not named his nominee by this weekend, I suspect this is the reason why?

 :whatever:

Quote
greenjar_01 (2,250 posts)

1. Yes, and it is going to be vicious and an in-your-face flouting of norms and there's nothing

that can be done about it.

Our system is designed for long-term minority government, like a slaver state.

 :mental:

Quote
beachbumbob (6,194 posts)

2. 100% they will, don;t fool yourself as this changes the direction of the court for 25 years

btw, it doesn;t matter if before or after the election as the outcome will be the same

Quote
Star Member BeyondGeography (35,972 posts)

5. Trump will name his nominee promptly and they will have the votes

Romney will come over and that will be the extent of the bleeding. Pence breaks the tie and if it needs to happen before Nov. 30 because of AZ it will.

Quote
Star Member ooky (5,027 posts)

8. Yes. They risk their own base turning on them in the election if they don't.

They also have the option of just saying they will vote on a new SCOTUS judge in the lame duck session as well. But McConnell will want to put the vote to the floor as soon as he has the votes.

Quote
JT45242 (218 posts)

9. Nov 4 2020

So as to avoid any voter backlash. They will not consider anything until Nov 4.

Remember the R motto -- Elections (not crimes by us) have consequences

That way they get a RW nut job on the court to turn back gay marriage, interracial marriage, EEOC, ACA, Roe v Wade, Tinker v Des Moines, etc, etc, etc

Quote
Star Member MineralMan (133,078 posts)

16. There will be threats.

Heavy ones. Those GOP Senators who are facing close races in their states will receive a great deal of pressure from McConnell and others. I hope that some of them have it in them to put on their stainless steel jockstraps and do the right thing. However, I have little confidence in my hope.

The left is already sending out death threats and rioting over it.

Quote
FBaggins (20,448 posts)

17. You need to remember that Senators are state elections

I know you know that... but I don't think you've considered which republican senators have competitive races and which states those are in.

Other than Collins and maybe McSally, most of them are more likely to "sacrifice their careers" if they don't back Trump's nominee. They all have conservative bases that they can't win without. Collins is in a completely different position, where even her republican voters lean comparatively left.

Quote
Star Member kentuck (99,336 posts)

18. I think more may in close races than we now think.

At least, I hope so.

 :whatever:
The torch of moral clarity since 12/18/07

2016 DOTY: 06 Omaha Steve - Is dying for ****'s face! How could you not vote for him, you heartless bastards!?!

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29434
  • Reputation: +3252/-248
My opinion is that they won't. Unless the Dems and other crazies go repellently nuclear-crazy ...
If The Vaccine is deadly as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, millions now living would have died.

Offline Mary Ann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1714
  • Reputation: +543/-19
Did kentuck (???????) forget what happened to Heitkamp, McCaskell, and O'Donnell after they voted against Justice Kavanaugh? They are now all FORMER Senators because of it. You can bet that Manchin and the dude from Alabama are looking at that and sweating bullets.

Offline FiddyBeowulf

  • "Its on, its off, its on, its off." "That is called blinking, boys."
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5271
  • Reputation: +523/-34
Quote
greenjar_01 (2,250 posts)

1. Yes, and it is going to be vicious and an in-your-face flouting of norms and there's nothing

that can be done about it.

Our system is designed for long-term minority government, like a slaver state.
You should sue whoever educated you.
Fire...BAD!!! - John Fetterman


The policies that are indorsed by this party, that they backer of which are much of the 1 percent, causes a social structure much like the one back before the Revolution.

-Words of wisdom from Lady Freedom Returns

"Arguing with liberals...it's like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock over the pieces, crap on the board and strut around like it's victorious." -- Anonymous

"A hat should be taken off when you greet a lady and left off for the rest of your life. Nothing looks more stupid than a hat." - P. J. O'Rourke

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29434
  • Reputation: +3252/-248
Quote
greenjar_01 (2,250 posts)

1. ...

Our system is designed for long-term minority government, like a slaver state.

No, our government is designed to hinder majorities from oppressing and exploiting minorities. That said, "Blue Slips", the filibuster, and requiring a super-majority to end debate are not in the US Constitution. They have been part of Senate rules (the House doesn't allow filibusters), which the USC allows the Senate to create or change as needed or desired. The Ds created the need for change when they used the super-majority rule in 1991 and 1992 to block G. H. W. Bush's judicial nominees and to block G. W. Bush's judicial nominees for much of his two terms as President.
If The Vaccine is deadly as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, millions now living would have died.

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29434
  • Reputation: +3252/-248
My opinion is that they won't. Unless the Dems and other crazies go repellently nuclear-crazy ...

I'm hearing noises that my opinion might be wrong. Hopefully I am.
If The Vaccine is deadly as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, millions now living would have died.

Offline DLR Pyro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9383
  • Reputation: +1555/-29
Quote
Sen. Mitt Romney announced Tuesday morning that he supports holding a vote on President Trump’s nominee to replace Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

“The Constitution gives the president the power to nominate and the Senate the authority to provide advice and consent on Supreme Court nominees,” Romney, a Republican senator from Utah, said in a statement. “Accordingly, I intend to follow the Constitution and precedent in considering the president’s nominee. If the nominee reaches the Senate floor, I intend to vote based upon their qualifications.”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/mitt-romney-support-trump-supreme-court-ruth-bader-ginsburg-nominee-145238691.html

doesn't say how he would vote, but at least he's for holding a vote
Biden is an illegitimate President.  Change my mind.

Police lives matter.

Basking in the glow of my white privilege

ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Wed Mar-09-11 08:50 PM
64.I'd almost be willing to get a job in order to participate in
A NATIONAL GENERAL STRIKE
  https://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4763020

Offline FiddyBeowulf

  • "Its on, its off, its on, its off." "That is called blinking, boys."
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5271
  • Reputation: +523/-34
https://www.yahoo.com/news/mitt-romney-support-trump-supreme-court-ruth-bader-ginsburg-nominee-145238691.html

doesn't say how he would vote, but at least he's for holding a vote
He hopes it will give him cover for voting no later on the nominee.
Fire...BAD!!! - John Fetterman


The policies that are indorsed by this party, that they backer of which are much of the 1 percent, causes a social structure much like the one back before the Revolution.

-Words of wisdom from Lady Freedom Returns

"Arguing with liberals...it's like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock over the pieces, crap on the board and strut around like it's victorious." -- Anonymous

"A hat should be taken off when you greet a lady and left off for the rest of your life. Nothing looks more stupid than a hat." - P. J. O'Rourke

Offline GOP Congress

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2334
  • Reputation: +274/-113
I have a newsflash for these poorly-disguised kiddy conspiracy theorists. Republican senators who are up for reelection are far, far more concerned about pissing off the Republican base who will undoubtedly punish them if they don't vote to confirm a justice that will help save the country. These are the same Republican voters who have witnessed months of Biden campaign rallies disguised as civic violence, have had their businesses severely affected if not totally bankrupt, and are now facing an onslaught of fraudulent mail-in ballots that won't be effectively dealt with at the judicial level with no constitutional ruling at SCOTUS.

UNDOUBTEDLY, this is why I believe that Romney and Murkowski are waffling on their decision to confirm. Romney even hinted he will vote for a "qualified" jurist; since every pick Trump makes is qualified beyond by any standards of excellence, this shouldn't be an issue, so if Romney back-flips, it's on him and not the justice. Suffice to say that Romney is getting an earful from his Utah constituents; same with Murkowski in Alaska. (I would even image Collins in Maine is getting some flak, but her race is another matter.)

As for Democrat voters... ANY Democrat motivation to vote has already been dialed up to 11. Dialing it up to 13 won't make a difference.
« Last Edit: September 24, 2020, 12:37:59 PM by GOP Congress »
"The main purpose of the Democrat Party and the Left is to destroy the United States, transform Western Civilization to a tribal-based dystopia, and to ultimately kill all conservatives and non progressives." - Jonah Kyle