DUmpmonkiez ready to surrender over North Korea.

[dutch508]

adigal (7,309 posts) https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029692486

Here it is....just heard it..."so would an ICBM hitting Los Angeles"


"We dont want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud over one of our cities."

On CNN, just heard a military member say this after saying that hitting Nirth Korea would be a mess. But so would "an ICBM hitting Los angelas.

The march to war is on. The propaganda has begun. Let's not let these warmongers trick us into war

again.

 

Star Member lapfog_1 (17,078 posts)
1. An ICBM hitting SF or LA

is steve bannon and his ilk's wet dream

i cant tell you the hatred that many deplorables have for CA.

Just having a CA license plate on my car in some rural areas of AZ has gotten my tires slashed and various people making threats or rolling their eyes at me

Its because Californians are mostly assholes.

Star Member Eliot Rosewater (7,900 posts)
2. No surprises there.

By being a patriotic American who respects all equally, you become the antithesis of what they believe.

It really is all about skin color and religion, women being unequal, etc.

 

Star Member Glassunion (10,175 posts)
5. Youre too late.

“Let's not let these warmongers trick us into war again.”

Too late for that, the war has already started. The pieces are already in place, just waiting for the game to start. War is profitable, and it simply makes good economical sense (for a select few) to have one. We haven’t started a war in a few years, and are more than overdue. I’ll wage a bet that we’ll have a draft for this one. Do you honestly think that there is anything you or I could do to stop it?

 

Star Member ThoughtCriminal (11,498 posts)
7. If north Korea attacks a U.S. city, it will not be an ICBM

It will be delivered in a jumbo shipping container - and even the largest may be too small.

I have very strong doubts that they have a nuclear device of any yield that would even fit in a large truck

 

Star Member Nevernose (12,097 posts)
9. Why would the North Koreans launch a nuclear missile at us?

At least without having been seriously attacked first?

Nobody seems to be able to answer this question, at least not rationally.
It also seems like >50% of what people “know” about North Korea is clearly South Korean propaganda. Treating the citizens like shit? Probably true. Almost certainly, in fact. I’m sure as shit not going there anytime soon. Feeding his uncle to wild dogs? Killing him with antiaircraft guns? Obvious bullshit. I’ve been hearing obvious bullshit about the North Koreans my entire life. The North Koreans claim to have unicorns, Kim Jung Un claims to have hit 18 holes in one his first time playing, KJU killed an entire K-Pop band for fun...

Our government lies just as much as theirs does. Ours is just more subtle about it.

 

IronLionZion (19,599 posts)
12. I've never seen people want an attack on our country so badly

as much as these traitor Republicans

says the people who side with our enemies on everything...

[Ralph Wiggum]

Rampant stupidity, as usual.  No one wants war.  If NK goofball starts some idiocy, we'll finish him.

[Mary Ann]

IronLionZion (19,599 posts)
12. I've never seen people want an attack on our country so badly

as much as these traitor Republicans

Just because IronLionZion may never have heard of Starpass:

I won't be hypocritcal. It is politically correct, particularly in any Dem discussion to hope and pray and feel for our troops and scream "bring them back now". I'm fighting something bigger.

I'm a 58 year old broad and I can tell you that what is going on in our country isn't the usual ebb and flow of politics where one party is in power and then another; where the economy goes through ups and downs.......yawn, yawn--just wait a bit and things will turn out peachy keen. That stupid la-la land is over.

I realize that not every GI Joe was 100peeercent behind Prseeedent Booosh going into this war; but I do know that that is what an overwhelming number of them and their famlies screamed in the face of protesters who were trying to protect these kids. Well, there is more than one way to be "dead" for your country. They are not only not accompishing squat in Iraq, they are doing crap nothing for the safety, defense of the US of A over there directly. But "indirectly" they are doing a lot.

The only way to get rid of this slime bag WASP-Mafia, oil barron ridden cartel of a government, this assault on Americans and anything one could laughingly call "a democracy", relies heavily on what a $#@! hole Iraq turns into. They need to die so that we can be free. Soldiers usually did that directly--i.e., fight those invading and harming a country. This time they need to die in defense of a lie from a lying adminstration to show these ignorant, dumb Americans that Bush is incompetent. They need to die so that Americans get rid of this deadly s$#@!. It is obscene, Barbie Bush, how other sons (of much nobler blood) have to die to save us from your Rosemary's Baby spawn and his ungodly cohorts.

Understand, ILZ? One of your own called for the deaths of Americans because she hated GWB so much.

The Internet is forever, and I, for one, will never forget this.

[SVPete]

Rampant stupidity, as usual.  No one wants war.  If NK goofball starts some idiocy, we'll finish him.

After Trump's Administration having handled 3 major hurricanes in 5 weeks, the prospect of Trump getting Kim III to back down must scare the @#$% out of DU-folk!