Author Topic: How the unionized Postal Service tried to swing the election for Hillary Clinton  (Read 2143 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline HAPPY2BME

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5617
  • Reputation: +100/-231
  • For The People And By The People
by Megan McKinley and Eric Peterson | Aug 10, 2017

While their actions weren't as nefarious as hacking voting machines, changing voter registration files, or throwing away campaign literature intended for voters, their alleged illegal activities are no less disturbing. And they are part of a larger pattern of unionized government employees working to grow the very programs that benefit their unions.

The Washington Post recently reported that the "Postal Service broke law in pushing time off for workers to campaign for Clinton." The law in question is the Hatch Act, which limits federal employee participation in certain types of political activities.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/postal-service-broke-law-in-pushing-time-off-for-workers-to-campaign-for-clinton-investigation-finds/2017/07/19/3292741c-6ca0-11e7-b9e2-2056e768a7e5_story.html?utm_term=.b2d43cc68494

An internal investigation was launched after several USPS employees approached their union representatives to complain.


http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/how-the-postal-service-tried-to-swing-the-election-for-hillary-clinton/article/2631196





Offline HAPPY2BME

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5617
  • Reputation: +100/-231
  • For The People And By The People
Unions such as the the American Federation of Government Employees, the AFSCME, and the American Federation of Teachers contribute millions to liberal groups, which then turn around and advocate higher taxes and spending that directly benefit those unions.

The potential for corruption in such a system is obvious. Even President Franklin Roosevelt, the great champion of bigger government, agreed. "All government employees should realize that the process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service," he wrote in 1937.

http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2013/aug/13/scott-walker/Did-FDR-oppose-collective-bargaining-for-governmen/

Offline HAPPY2BME

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5617
  • Reputation: +100/-231
  • For The People And By The People
In the Clinton campaign case, the Postal Service relieved union members of their postal duties for weeks at a time and encouraged employees to do union-funded work for various Democratic candidates while on leave, even in the face of local post office managers' complaints of understaffing. Door-to-door efforts and phone banks were used to promote Clinton's campaign; while the workers requested leave without pay, they were compensated through the union's political action committee.

These were not just a few rogue postal workers. The National Association of Letter Carriers allegedly sent a list of individuals who would be participating in the campaign to USPS headquarters. Later, a senior labor relations official forwarded the information to other locations across the country.

When faced with these accusations, Postmaster General Megan Brennan said "senior postal leadership did not in any way guide union leadership in selecting the candidates for whom NALC employees could campaign."

But it's no surprise that the NALC lists were interpreted as explicit directives from the top that participants were to be given leave without pay so they could work on campaigns. Investigators said the practice of giving union employees leave to participate in campaign activity was "long-standing" and has been going on for about two decades.

Offline HAPPY2BME

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5617
  • Reputation: +100/-231
  • For The People And By The People
But the broader scandal isn't just that government employees were in the tank for the Democratic candidate or even that employees possibly violated the Hatch Act (or that the USPS lost $2.1 billion in one quarter). It's that government unions have for years been incentivizing their workers to spend time pushing their political agenda rather than serving their customers. Campaigning for a candidate who wants to grow government is just a more egregious form of that all-too-common practice.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/postal-service-posts-21-billion-loss-in-quarter/article/2631146