https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029202671What the... did this monkey forget his lines?
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 12:20 PM
Star Member MGKrebs (7,373 posts)
I hate this place at times like this.
Is it really so hard to just be critical of the act and supportive of the victims?
What is the purpose of making it partisan, or saying it's OK because "they" did it first?
Does it really make you feel better to be that tribal? Aren't we trying to make things better?
39
As usual, the first post is always most telling... before the trend starts and the lemmings know how they are supposed to feel about something
Response to MGKrebs (Original post)Wed Jun 14, 2017, 12:22 PM
Star Member gopiscrap (15,454 posts)
1. it's partisan because if we don't make it partisan they will
the sorry state of our nation makes it needed to be just as shitty and dirty as they are. Democrats need to grow a thicker skin and not give a **** about offending anyone otherwise we will continue to lose elections
Response to MGKrebs (Reply #23)Wed Jun 14, 2017, 01:40 PM
LOL Lib (1,297 posts)
57. I understand your argument completely.
We have been leading by example and it hasn't gotten much traction. Repukes never change until they are directly effected it seems. I know we should detest all forms of violence no matter who it is against. I'm not a perfect person so unfortunately I get frustrated with constantly being told to turn the other cheek. Sometimes I just want the privileged white repukes to suffer the same violence they condone against others.
HAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAH! Yea, that's some "example"
Response to Else You Are Mad (Reply #3)Wed Jun 14, 2017, 12:29 PM
Star Member gopiscrap (15,454 posts)
13. bullshit we will only win when we get in the gutter
and fight fire with fire
yea, you just keep thinking that, it's working out great for.. US
and THIS one claims they supported G-Dub... yup, you heard it right:
Response to Else You Are Mad (Reply #3)Wed Jun 14, 2017, 02:05 PM
Cosmocat (9,686 posts)
72. 9-11
Dems absolutely got behind W in the aftermath of 9-11, and the simpleton got his favorability ratings into the 90% range.
Out of the gates, had it happened under Gore, no damn way they got behind him like that, none.
That said, they IMMEDIATELY started their spin of how, despite it being 8 months into his tenure, despite his completely sleep walking through IC warnings, it was in fact Clinton's fault for not getting OBL (when they were all up his ass at the time screaming how his warnings about the dangers of Islamic terrorists were just an attempt to distract from his blow job).
They then spent the next five years using 9-11 as a political sledge hammer, called us "in league with the terrorists" if we questioned anything and screamed about how YOU CAN'T CRITICIZE THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF WHILE TROOPS ARE IN THE FIELD! - a phrase never again repeated after January of 2009.
Benghazi, something that happened literally a dozen times when W was in charge, and they went ape shit and made it into the greatest scandal in history.
All this "hatred" is 90% them, playing it both ways ...
And, is why they have wrestled their way into full control in DC and most of the states.
We ARE "better than them" but that means very little when they use their assholeness to get a vice grip on power.
And, the token race card, of course:
Response to MGKrebs (Original post)Wed Jun 14, 2017, 12:23 PM
SweetieD (660 posts)
4. What would an avowed white supremacist like Scalise think about me as a black woman if I got shot?
Well that is what I feel for him. Contempt.
This was a man who praised himself for being David Duke without the baggage. A man who spoke at a white supremacist convention.
I am not aware of all the victims. If some were decent and innocent people who were harmed I feel sorry for them getting caught in the crossfire.
Plenty more stupid at the link if you can stomach it
