Author Topic: Stinky gets it. (tax returns)  (Read 1353 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dutch508

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12588
  • Reputation: +1741/-1068
  • Remember
Stinky gets it. (tax returns)
« on: March 14, 2017, 09:06:07 PM »
Quote
Star Member Stinky The Clown (55,841 posts) http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028792269

I'm getting a strong whiff of Dan Rather's cologne and Mary Mapes' perfume.

Dropped in a mailbox.

Just two pages.

Fuzzy fonts.

Speculation fodder.

Substantively thin.
















context: Maddow/Johnston/45/140's alleged tax return

 :tongue:

Quote
TheDebbieDee (9,823 posts)
1. I also worry that Rachel is being set up to be "Rathered"...

 :rotf:

Quote
Star Member uponit7771 (40,681 posts)
2. +1, thinking this was a trap at the time of the announcement ... Benedict Donald's a bastard

I thought you ****s said trump was an idiot.

The torch of moral clarity since 12/18/07

2016 DOTY: 06 Omaha Steve - Is dying for ****'s face! How could you not vote for him, you heartless bastards!?!

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34838
  • Reputation: +3978/-248
Re: Stinky gets it. (tax returns)
« Reply #1 on: March 15, 2017, 07:47:54 AM »
Quote
Star Member Stinky The Clown (55,841 posts) http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028792269

I'm getting a strong whiff of Dan Rather's cologne and Mary Mapes' perfume.

Dropped in a mailbox.

Just two pages.

Fuzzy fonts.

Speculation fodder.

Substantively thin.

Yeppers. Rachel MadCow's nickname is well (hic!) earned!
Whose Shampeachment Is It Anyway, where the high crimes are made up, and the evidence doesn't matter

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34838
  • Reputation: +3978/-248
Re: Stinky gets it. (tax returns)
« Reply #2 on: March 15, 2017, 07:59:17 AM »
Quote
TheDebbieDee (9,823 posts)
1. I also worry that Rachel is being set up to be "Rathered"...

Rather & Mapes were taken down by their own Bush-hatred and confirmation bias. They so wanted the fauxtocopy handed to them by another hysterical Bush-Hater that they broadcast the fauxtocopy without doing the kind of fact-checking and qualifying statements a teenager would know to do (for example, Rather claimed the document had been authenticated, but one need not need be a professional document examiner to know a photocopy, intrinsically, cannot be authenticated*). IOW, except in a fevered CT-minded imagination Rather and Mapes were not victims of anyone except themselves.

As for Rachel MadCow, she'll also bring herself down - maybe with a spectacular meltdown, maybe gradually, like Keithie has. But not this time (though this over-hyping could be part of a Keithie-style self-sabotage slide).
Whose Shampeachment Is It Anyway, where the high crimes are made up, and the evidence doesn't matter