Author Topic: Jill Stein tweets this:  (Read 682 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bluetoo

  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 10
  • Reputation: +6/-10
Jill Stein tweets this:
« on: November 27, 2016, 10:14:15 AM »
Dr. Jill Stein ‏@DrJillStein 18h18 hours ago

Why would Hillary Clinton—who holds "public" and "private" positions—want to engage in something as transparent as #Recount2016?


And you all put money in her pocket???  Wow, DUmmies. She got you GOOD.  :rofl:

Offline Bad Dog

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5927
  • Reputation: +313/-313
  • God help me I do love it so
Re: Jill Stein tweets this:
« Reply #1 on: November 27, 2016, 10:48:50 AM »
Apparently all she has spent of the millions she has raised are a few filing fees.  I expect she is pissed because hitlery is screwing up her plan to declare technical problems and back out before she had to part with most of the money she is scamming. 

Offline notaDUmmie

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 366
  • Reputation: +60/-7
  • MDT 5/20/96-6/19/15
Re: Jill Stein tweets this:
« Reply #2 on: November 27, 2016, 12:38:48 PM »
I just read another of Jill the Pill's tweets, and she said they have ~1500 volunteers to sign affidavits in PA for the recount...but a DUmmie posted the other day that they need something like 27,000 voters, 3 from each precinct.

So my question is, if Jill the Pill can't get a recount in PA, meaning that Shillary can't win (because she needs WI, MI & PA), will the DUmmies explode and claim they were robbed?  Will they blame Shillary for not helping with the recount effort in PA?  Will they turn on Jill the Pill and suddenly realize that it was nothing more than a money grab for the Greens? Will they say there is no need to recount anyplace else?

Inquiring minds want to know...

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1707/-151
Re: Jill Stein tweets this:
« Reply #3 on: November 27, 2016, 07:54:19 PM »
I just read another of Jill the Pill's tweets, and she said they have ~1500 volunteers to sign affidavits in PA for the recount...but a DUmmie posted the other day that they need something like 27,000 voters, 3 from each precinct.

So my question is, if Jill the Pill can't get a recount in PA, meaning that Shillary can't win (because she needs WI, MI & PA), will the DUmmies explode and claim they were robbed?  Will they blame Shillary for not helping with the recount effort in PA?  Will they turn on Jill the Pill and suddenly realize that it was nothing more than a money grab for the Greens? Will they say there is no need to recount anyplace else?

Inquiring minds want to know...

From what I understand, they have to show a prima facie case of fraud to a judge in order to even get a recount in PA, just filing for one and posting a bond for fees and costs won't cut it there at this point.

ETA - I'm sure they can find a crooked Dem judge, but then the question will be whether the Secretary of State, or one of the other campaigns, can and will file an interlocutory appeal to overrule the judge.
« Last Edit: November 27, 2016, 07:59:46 PM by DumbAss Tanker »
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline zeitgeist

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6195
  • Reputation: +391/-44
Re: Jill Stein tweets this:
« Reply #4 on: November 27, 2016, 08:01:24 PM »
It is said money is the mother's milk of politics (before Trump changed things up).  Jill and Hill will have bleed the Democrats white.  They were in bad shape before Hillary took them down the chute.  They are facing tough mid term elections in the Senate.  They will need massive infusions of cash soon.  But when the money's all gone for useless stuff like DU and Jill the Shill, you can always send healing white light.  :-)
< watch this space for coming distractions >

Offline notaDUmmie

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 366
  • Reputation: +60/-7
  • MDT 5/20/96-6/19/15
Re: Jill Stein tweets this:
« Reply #5 on: November 27, 2016, 08:29:17 PM »
Apparently all she has spent of the millions she has raised are a few filing fees.  I expect she is pissed because hitlery is screwing up her plan to declare technical problems and back out before she had to part with most of the money she is scamming.

It's actually even better than that...I watched Jill's video on the PA recount, and she said that some counties can't be recounted, because their returns have already been certified.  She doesn't say it in the video, but I have it on very good authority that there are currently 10 counties that can't be recounted - Adams, Cumberland, Delaware, Fayette, Fulton, Lebanon, Luzerne, Monroe and Wayne.  Together, those counties account for ~15% of the PA vote.

Additionally, although she states on her site that she will need $500,000 to file for the PA recount.  That's based on ~9100 precincts at $50/precinct.  However, she is telling the people stupid enough to file affidavits that they shouldn't have to pay anything, and that if they do, they need to send a copy of the receipt to her team, and they will be reimbursed.

So...we know there won't be 9100 precincts, since some won't be counted, so that drops the price.  And if she is saying that there isn't a filing fee, then what is the $500,000 for that she lists a filing fee?

I'm torn...on the one hand, I love seeing DUmmies flush their money down this particular toilet.  On the other hand, it's probably my tax money, so that pisses me off.

Offline 98ZJUSMC

  • The Most Deplorable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8424
  • Reputation: +436/-76
  • Now, with 99% less yellow!
Re: Jill Stein tweets this:
« Reply #6 on: November 27, 2016, 10:33:27 PM »
From what I understand, they have to show a prima facie case of fraud to a judge in order to even get a recount in PA, just filing for one and posting a bond for fees and costs won't cut it there at this point.

^^^^^^This!   :II:  Even the ones initiating this have publicly stated that there is no evidence of fraud in any of the three states.

Quote
  ETA - I'm sure they can find a crooked Dem judge, but then the question will be whether the Secretary of State, or one of the other campaigns, can and will file an interlocutory appeal to overrule the judge.

*ding* *ding* *ding*!!
              

Liberal thinking is a two-legged stool and magical thinking is one of the legs, the other is a combination of self-loating and misanthropy.  To understand it, you would have to be able to sit on that stool while juggling two elephants, an anvil and a fragmentation grenade, sans pin.

"Accuse others of what you do." - Karl Marx