Author Topic: Chaos At Nevada Democratic Convention; State Party Chair Flees Building  (Read 3079 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Quote
Chaos At Nevada Democratic Convention; State Party Chair Flees Building As Sanders Supporters Demand Recount

Adryenn Ashley posted several live videos (below) from inside the Paris Hotel in Las Vegas, where arcane secondary rounds of the delegate selection process of Nevada's Democratic caucus erupted into chaos Saturday night. Bernie Sanders supporters demanded 64 rejected pro-Sanders delegates listed in a "minority report" prepared by their campaign be allowed to participate in selecting delegates for the national convention.

State party chair and DNC executive committee member Roberta Lange refused to reconsider their decision not to allow this, adjourned, and fled the building amid a chorus of boos; leaving hotel security and local police officers to handle the angry Sanders supporters.

Earlier in the day, the Sanders camp objected to several of their delegates being disqualified from voting for administrative reasons, and booed Sen. Barbara Boxer when she called for unity. "If you're booing me, you're booing Bernie Sanders," she told them. "Go ahead, boo yourselves out of this election."

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9yNZbNqraE[/youtube]
Real Clear Politics

:popcorn:
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Disaffected Bernie supporters staying home is the only chance Trump has of winning.  :-)

Offline wasp69

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7567
  • Reputation: +907/-520
  • Hillbilly Yeti
Disaffected Bernie supporters staying home is the only chance Trump has of winning.  :-)

Why not?  It worked for obama in 2012.
"We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and then bid the geldings to be fruitful."

C.S. Lewis

A community may possess all the necessary moral qualifications, in so high a degree, as to be capable of self-government under the most adverse circumstances; while, on the other hand, another may be so sunk in ignorance and vice, as to be incapable of forming a conception of liberty, or of living, even when most favored by circumstances, under any other than an absolute and despotic government.

John C Calhoun, "Disquisition on Government", 1840

Offline Gina

  • Tinker Twat
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13088
  • Reputation: +830/-102
  • Short Bus bound!
Bernie supporters are violent aren't they?






"An army of deer led by a lion is more to be feared than an army of lions led by a deer." Phillip of Macedonia, father to Alexander.

Offline BlueStateSaint

  • Here I come to save the day, because I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32553
  • Reputation: +1560/-191
  • RIP FDNY Lt. Rich Nappi d. 4/16/12
Disaffected Bernie supporters staying home is the only chance Trump has of winning.  :-)

Trump is the second choice for more than a few of those people.  Neither one are Establishment, and that's what the Bernouts like.
"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

"All you have to do is look straight and see the road, and when you see it, don't sit looking at it - walk!" -Ayn Rand
 
"Those that trust God with their safety must yet use proper means for their safety, otherwise they tempt Him, and do not trust Him.  God will provide, but so must we also." - Matthew Henry, Commentary on 2 Chronicles 32, from Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible

"These anti-gun fools are more dangerous to liberty than street criminals or foreign spies."--Theodore Haas, Dachau Survivor

Chase her.
Chase her even when she's yours.
That's the only way you'll be assured to never lose her.

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Trump is the second choice for more than a few of those people.  Neither one are Establishment, and that's what the Bernouts like.

But will those outnumber the "Never Trump" group that won't be voting for the gop candidate?

Offline wasp69

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7567
  • Reputation: +907/-520
  • Hillbilly Yeti
But will those outnumber the "Never Trump" group that won't be voting for the gop candidate?

I don't think the "Never Trump" group is nearly as powerful as is being portrayed.  If they were, then they would have been able to field a third party candidate to go after him in the general election.
"We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and then bid the geldings to be fruitful."

C.S. Lewis

A community may possess all the necessary moral qualifications, in so high a degree, as to be capable of self-government under the most adverse circumstances; while, on the other hand, another may be so sunk in ignorance and vice, as to be incapable of forming a conception of liberty, or of living, even when most favored by circumstances, under any other than an absolute and despotic government.

John C Calhoun, "Disquisition on Government", 1840

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
I don't think the "Never Trump" group is nearly as powerful as is being portrayed.  If they were, then they would have been able to field a third party candidate to go after him in the general election.

Their goal isn't to win, merely to prevent Trump winning at all costs. There are plenty of "third party" candidates already on the ballot.

Cruz and the others had more overall support than Trump and his supporters are still insulting those people on social networking sites.

Offline wasp69

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7567
  • Reputation: +907/-520
  • Hillbilly Yeti
Their goal isn't to win, merely to prevent Trump winning at all costs.

I know that, which I why I said the Never Trump crowd was unable to field any other challenge that would have derailed him.  I personally think that would have been a great idea - if the GOP was that hellbent on committing suicide.  But I don't think the support for their cause is as deep as they believe it is.
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/279749-third-party-effort-fizzling-out

Just an observation, nothing more.

Quote
Cruz and the others had more overall support than Trump and his supporters are still insulting those people on social networking sites.

I've seen the insults go both ways, but if you're looking at total support across several candidates to one candidate, wouldn't it be kind of difficult not to have more overall support?
"We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and then bid the geldings to be fruitful."

C.S. Lewis

A community may possess all the necessary moral qualifications, in so high a degree, as to be capable of self-government under the most adverse circumstances; while, on the other hand, another may be so sunk in ignorance and vice, as to be incapable of forming a conception of liberty, or of living, even when most favored by circumstances, under any other than an absolute and despotic government.

John C Calhoun, "Disquisition on Government", 1840

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127

I've seen the insults go both ways, but if you're looking at total support across several candidates to one candidate, wouldn't it be kind of difficult not to have more overall support?

One side of that equation should be trying to win supporters from the other. They need to stop acting like sore winners and act the "bigger person". Instead they are doubling down and making sure some people will never vote for Trump. Hillary will win if she isn't indicted.

Offline wasp69

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7567
  • Reputation: +907/-520
  • Hillbilly Yeti
One side of that equation should be trying to win supporters from the other. They need to stop acting like sore winners and act the "bigger person". Instead they are doubling down and making sure some people will never vote for Trump. Hillary will win if she isn't indicted.

Well, if those who aren't current Trump supporters are going to sit on their hands and allow Hillary a victory because someone said mean things to them, what does that say about their character?  Quite frankly, I don't believe that for one minute - I really don't. 

If a voter has their vote swayed in that manner, and they can't make a decision on their own, then they don't need to be voting.
"We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and then bid the geldings to be fruitful."

C.S. Lewis

A community may possess all the necessary moral qualifications, in so high a degree, as to be capable of self-government under the most adverse circumstances; while, on the other hand, another may be so sunk in ignorance and vice, as to be incapable of forming a conception of liberty, or of living, even when most favored by circumstances, under any other than an absolute and despotic government.

John C Calhoun, "Disquisition on Government", 1840

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Well, if those who aren't current Trump supporters are going to sit on their hands and allow Hillary a victory because someone said mean things to them, what does that say about their character?  Quite frankly, I don't believe that for one minute - I really don't. 

If a voter has their vote swayed in that manner, and they can't make a decision on their own, then they don't need to be voting.

Some of those same Trump supporters sat on their thumbs and refused to vote for Mitt Romney.

Offline wasp69

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7567
  • Reputation: +907/-520
  • Hillbilly Yeti
Some of those same Trump supporters sat on their thumbs and refused to vote for Mitt Romney.

As, I'm sure, did Cruz supporters, Rubio supporters, Kasich supporters, etc.  So, after watching those people sit on their thumbs, and not vote for Romney, the answer now is to, what?  Sit on their thumbs and not vote for Trump?

I'm sorry, but I cannot wrap my head around the level of intellectual dishonesty I am seeing in this presidential election cycle.  4 years ago, I was told that if I didn't vote for Romney/Ryan, I was surely handing obama a victory.  Today, I'm hearing that supporting an effort to undercut the presumptive nominee for whatever reason is not a vote for Hillary, it's a valiant effort to save the GOP.

I'm sorry, that just doesn't compute.  Neither does the rationale I see bandied about for doing it.

But, going back to my original point, I don't think the Never Trump effort is going to have the effect that those who are trying to implement it think it will have.  It seems that quite a few in this country are not willing to hamstring the nominee at the behest of the donor class of the GOPe.
"We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and then bid the geldings to be fruitful."

C.S. Lewis

A community may possess all the necessary moral qualifications, in so high a degree, as to be capable of self-government under the most adverse circumstances; while, on the other hand, another may be so sunk in ignorance and vice, as to be incapable of forming a conception of liberty, or of living, even when most favored by circumstances, under any other than an absolute and despotic government.

John C Calhoun, "Disquisition on Government", 1840

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
I don't recall Romney every being a democrat not a big donor to democrats.  Trump has yet to provide a clear view of where he stands on anything.

All I ever hear is "Make America Great Again!"  "Build a wall". And that second one he is already backing down on.

Offline wasp69

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7567
  • Reputation: +907/-520
  • Hillbilly Yeti
I don't recall Romney every being a democrat not a big donor to democrats. 

Do you mean to tell me that one of the biggest GOPe RINOs gets a pass for that?  C'mon, man!

He may not have been registered as a democrat (registered "Independent" in MA), but he sure had no problem voting for them.

Quote
Trump has yet to provide a clear view of where he stands on anything.

If you say so, but he has sure caught a lot of heat for not taking a stand on "anything".

Quote
All I ever hear is "Make America Great Again!"  "Build a wall". And that second one he is already backing down on.

I think you may be engaging in hyperbole, but, if that's your take, then that's your take.  I have yet to hear a honest, consistent explanation how not voting for Trump (provided he's the nominee) is not a vote for Hillary (like I've heard the past 3 election cycles), though.
"We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and then bid the geldings to be fruitful."

C.S. Lewis

A community may possess all the necessary moral qualifications, in so high a degree, as to be capable of self-government under the most adverse circumstances; while, on the other hand, another may be so sunk in ignorance and vice, as to be incapable of forming a conception of liberty, or of living, even when most favored by circumstances, under any other than an absolute and despotic government.

John C Calhoun, "Disquisition on Government", 1840

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Do you mean to tell me that one of the biggest GOPe RINOs gets a pass for that?  C'mon, man!

He may not have been registered as a democrat (registered "Independent" in MA), but he sure had no problem voting for them.
And Trump supported Mitch McConnell in his bid to defeat conservatives in senate races. Trump is at best a RINO and more likely a liberal playing games.

If you say so, but he has sure caught a lot of heat for not taking a stand on "anything".
He takes heat from the left, but he takes heat from conservatives on his flip flops to appease the left. He's already backed down immigration, Planned Parenthood and the wall.

I think you may be engaging in hyperbole, but, if that's your take, then that's your take.  I have yet to hear a honest, consistent explanation how not voting for Trump (provided he's the nominee) is not a vote for Hillary (like I've heard the past 3 election cycles), though.

Fox News carried plenty of his speeches in their entirety. He said a lot of words, but never gave many specifics other than those I said. Those weren't even specifics, just more "hope and change" rhetoric like we heard from Obama.
 I have yet to hear how not voting for Trump is voting for Hillary. It's a BS claim.

Offline wasp69

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7567
  • Reputation: +907/-520
  • Hillbilly Yeti
And Trump supported Mitch McConnell in his bid to defeat conservatives in senate races. Trump is at best a RINO and more likely a liberal playing games.

But Romney and McCain were A-ok?

Quote
He's already backed down immigration, Planned Parenthood and the wall.

I can't think of a candidate who hasn't had to walk back statements or otherwise soften them.  I can remember face palming after my guy (Ted Cruz) said that the police needed to "patrol and secure" muslim neighborhoods.  Not that I didn't agree with what he was saying, I knew he was going to have to do some serious explaining.

Quote
It's a BS claim.

It wasn't a BS claim for 08 and 12, why is it now?
"We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and then bid the geldings to be fruitful."

C.S. Lewis

A community may possess all the necessary moral qualifications, in so high a degree, as to be capable of self-government under the most adverse circumstances; while, on the other hand, another may be so sunk in ignorance and vice, as to be incapable of forming a conception of liberty, or of living, even when most favored by circumstances, under any other than an absolute and despotic government.

John C Calhoun, "Disquisition on Government", 1840