Da Mannn (3,710 posts)
5. Moral of the story: Don't commit crime.
Prison sucks. If you don't want to go there, don't do crime.
If you do a crime and end up there...I don't care what happens to you.
I would be in favor of basic protections, like small cells with only ONE occupant. No roommates. I could see that.
A shower in your individual cell.
But beyond that...no luxuries, nothing special.

I wonder how such sense crept into DU.

Strange Luck (11,881 posts)
15. You ever sped? Ever go over 20mph above speed limit? Do you know how many laws you break
each day?
http://www.thecrimereport.org/archive/how-many-laws-did-you-break-today/
http://lifehacker.com/5888488/how-youre-breaking-the-law-every-day-and-what-you-can-do-about-it
And on and on.
Well, that response is rated

. And, yeah. One doesn't get prison time for speeding. Probably not even overnight jail time, unless one is also DUI. Typical utterly non-equivalent
moral equivalency argument.
Libs & Progs need to wrap what brains they have around a couple of basic facts. Society (imperfectly) uses jails and prisons to get people who have proven themselves dangerous off the streets. Jailers and prison guards are human beings: they aren't omni-present; they aren't omniscient; despite screening, they aren't all saintly; the offenders who are incarcerated don't instantaneously become saintly.
Libs & Progs are long on whining about imperfections - real and imagined - in jails and prisons, but rather quiet on realistic solutions.
And, no I haven't driven 20 mph over the speed limit. What does it say about the DU-member who posted that not-so-devastating non-equivalent
moral equivalency argument that (s)he assumed that any/every honest person would have to answer, "Yes"?