Barry hands Iran Nukes.... DU: That can't be right!?!?

[dutch508]

madville (2,958 posts) http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141182202

AP EXCLUSIVE: UN TO LET IRAN INSPECT ALLEGED NUKE WORK SITE

You'd best get ready for war, children.

madville (2,958 posts)
2. Schumer is probably calling other Democrats now Saying I told you so.

blm (94,581 posts)
83. And he'd be lying just as AP here is lying to YOU, its trusted audience who the fascist elite rely on to further their propaganda.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141183184#post11

 

global1 (12,855 posts)
3. Are We Sure That What Is Being Said....was interpreted correctly or is there a misunderstanding somewhere. This just doesn't make sense. Something is rotten in Denmark (and Iran).

Could it be Barry is playing for the other side?

Senator Tankerbell (69 posts)
4. The author of this article has apparently been accused of spreading Israeli propaganda in the past.
http://mondoweiss.net/2012/11/the-aps-george-jahn-serves-up-israeli-propangada-on-iran-yet-again

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/nov/28/ap-iran-nuclear-bomb

It's all over the news, poopbreath. It's not one author.

madville (2,958 posts)
5. Accused by pro-Palestinian websites

Noted.

Wait for it....

Senator Tankerbell (69 posts)
6. What's wrong with being pro-palestinian?

 

geek tragedy (49,910 posts)
15. So in your mind being pro-Palestinian is a bad thing. This explains your urge to see a war with Iran with the resulting death toll.

 

leftynyc (15,399 posts)
40. I just saw an administration official trying to defend this by saying the UN inspectors will be involved. This is a major problem and gives anyone (Dem or Rep) all the evidence they need to vote against the deal. You may trust Iran but the vast majority of Americans do not. And really? You're whining about Israeli propaganda and using Mondoweiss as a reliable source? YOu either don't know about Mondoweiss or you don't really mind propaganda when it comes from the side you agree with.

Oops.

randome (25,787 posts)
9. Wow. A thread here and in GD. This must really bug you.

The U.N. will handle whatever inspections of past sites the way they want. And the U.S. and the other signatories to the treaty will handle inspections of suspect current sites the way they want.

See? It's still easy.

except that isn't what is going to happen.

leftynyc (15,399 posts)
42. An administration official has already confirmed this story and tried to defend it by saying the UN would be involved. So you can stop trying to shoot the messenger and deal with the fact this is a real problem and all anyone needs to vote against the deal.

 

karynnj (51,210 posts)
43. the ap already updated it's story and the administration never confirmed the story

The administration backed the UN and IAEA. That is not the same as backing the AP story.

 

leftynyc (15,399 posts)
51. I did a google search and couldn't find one article from the AP or anywhere else that tells of the AP backing off their story. You're the second person to make the claim and neither of you has provided any proof. Coincidence?

 

leftynyc (15,399 posts)
56. And I can't find that revised report ANYWHERE

2 different google searches came up empty.

blm (94,581 posts)
79. AP's propaganda reeks to high heaven. Surprised you didn't smell it.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141183184#post11

leftynyc (15,399 posts)
45. I saw the administration guy on CNN at around 5:45 AM this morning. You want to think I'm a liar, go for it. I don't give a shit.

blm (94,581 posts)
81. How many RW fundie Republicans here in US would 'Nuke em' or 'Glass em' or

'Turn it into a parking lot' or 'Blast it back to the stone age'?

BTW - the professional propagandists who enjoy your trust are now backpedaling on this BS story, aren't they?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141183184#post11

still_one (38,163 posts)
76. AP has deliberately distorted the story. The Obama administration has said the following:


"The Obama administration is acknowledging that Iranians would be involved in inspections of the sensitive Parchin military site under a draft arrangement with the U.N., but officials are stressing that they are not the only ones who would be investigating the Iranian location long believed to have hosted covert militarized nuclear activity.

A senior State Department official said that the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, or IAEA, would have "total oversight" of sampling and inspections of Parchin under the agreement between the agency and Iran over access to the site.

"Iran is not self-inspecting," the official said, though this official would not deny that Iranian inspectors will "play a role."

http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/19/politics/iran-nuclear-deal-inspections-parchin/index.html

Based on the timing, this smells a lot like the Iraq WMDs redux

[Carl]

Corrupt UN bribe takers will stand and watch is all it means.

[obumazombie]

Put Major Scott Ritter back on the job.
He was as corrupt and incompetent as any involved now.

[98ZJUSMC]

Put Major Scott Ritter back on the job.
He was as corrupt and incompetent as any involved now.

My God. Caution: duh!1111 Statement Follows Any information that even slightly goes counter to that marble rolling around in your heads is:

A).  Raycisss!!!111
B).  Raycisss!!!111 and RW Fundie.
C).  Raycisss!!!111 and joooooooo lies!!111!!
D).  Raycisss!!!111 and fAuXnOoooS!!!!1111
E).  All of the Above plus eLeBiNtybILLioN!!!!!111

Any site.  Doesn't matter which one. 

"Iran is not self-inspecting," the official said, though this official would not deny that Iranian inspectors will "play a role."

Oh, puhleeeze..........   

madville (2,958 posts)
2. Schumer is probably calling other Democrats now Saying I told you so.

 

Based on the timing, this smells a lot like the Iraq WMDs redux