Of course.... the shooter was from Alabama. Guy didn't have a concealed permit. Dude shouldn't have been able to buy a gun with the existing laws. So--- how is that Jindal's fault? Oh... right. He's a Republican.
And the movie theater was a "gun free zone" ... until Houser broke that law as well.
DU-folk - and other gun-grabbers - dare not ask themselves: how is it that all these murderers manage to commit murder despite all these
magically effective anti-gun laws?
Could it be that their gun "control" laws are intrinsically ineffective?
Could it be that disarming law-abiding citizens makes murder and crime rates worse?
Could it be that the problem is not the inanimate symbol, the gun, but the hearts of the murderers (whom many gun-grabbers view as victims of society)?