Author Topic: Clinton vs. Bush on Iran  (Read 2409 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline libertybele

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 639
  • Reputation: +50/-21
Clinton vs. Bush on Iran
« on: July 14, 2015, 01:16:55 PM »
In as much as I really don't like Jeb, I have to give him credit on this one; anyone with half a brain can see that it's a bad deal for the U.S., Israel and the free world.  Barry is a Muslim and has been stacking the deck against us since he took office and this pretty much seals our fate.  Our last hope is that there are enough DEMS in the Senate that vote against his latest lame-brain foreign policy.

‘Important step’ vs. ‘appeasement’: Hillary Clinton versus Jeb Bush on Iran deal

eb Bush and Hillary Clinton offered starkly differing reactions Tuesday to the deal reached between Iran, the U.S. and five other world powers, in an indication the nuclear agreement will be a lasting issue as the presidential campaign heats up.

Clinton, the frontrunner for the Democratic presidential nomination, called the deal an “important step that puts the lid on Iran’s nuclear program.” A congressman who was in a Capitol Hill meeting with Clinton and House Democrats said the former secretary of state gave the deal a “full-throated endorsement,” but she was measured when facing cameras later, as Bloomberg reported. She said the agreement would have to be enforced “vigorously” and Iran’s “bad behavior” on human rights needs to be addressed.

Former Florida Gov. Bush, the leader in polls for the Republican nomination, ripped the deal, calling it “dangerous, deeply flawed and short sighted.”

He added: “This isn’t diplomacy — it is appeasement.”

The deal, announced in Vienna, holds Iran to strict limits on its nuclear activities for 10 years. The aim is to ensure Iran is a minimum of a year away from amassing enough nuclear fuel for a bomb. In exchange, the U.S., European Union and the United Nations will lift international sanctions on Tehran. Western diplomats say that could help Iran’s economy expand by 7% to 8% annually for several years, The Wall Street Journal wrote.

The deal now faces skeptical members of Congress, who have 60 days to debate it publicly. They could then vote to approve or reject the deal. President Barack Obama, meanwhile, has said he would veto any legislation to scuttle the agreement. ..


http://www.marketwatch.com/story/important-step-vs-appeasement-hillary-clinton-versus-jeb-bush-on-iran-deal-2015-07-14

I believe in the United States of America as a government of the people, by the people, for the people; whose just powers are derived from the consent of the governed, a democracy in a republic, a sovereign Nation of many sovereign States; a perfect union, one and inseparable; established upon those principles of freedom, equality, justice, and humanity for which American patriots sacrificed their lives and fortunes. I therefore believe it is my duty to my country to love it, to support its Constitution, to obey its laws, to respect its flag, and to defend it against all enemies.

Offline txradioguy

  • Minister of Propaganda
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18686
  • Reputation: +1292/-1116
  • Rule 39
Re: Clinton vs. Bush on Iran
« Reply #1 on: July 14, 2015, 02:17:36 PM »
Jeb = Broken Clock/Blind Squirrel
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Creator of the largest Fight Club thread ever!

http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=83285.0

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Re: Clinton vs. Bush on Iran
« Reply #2 on: July 14, 2015, 03:05:27 PM »
Quote
The deal now faces skeptical members of Congress, who have 60 days to debate it publicly. They could then vote to approve or reject the deal. President Barack Obama, meanwhile, has said he would veto any legislation to scuttle the agreement.

WTF? What kind of cocksucking agreement is this if Obama gets the final say either way, and congress has no say in the matter?

Offline libertybele

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 639
  • Reputation: +50/-21
Re: Clinton vs. Bush on Iran
« Reply #3 on: July 14, 2015, 03:08:05 PM »
Jeb = Broken Clock/Blind Squirrel

Jeb is a RINO without a doubt. I still don't like him, and I sure as heck will NO vote for him, but his assessment of the "deal" is correct. 
I believe in the United States of America as a government of the people, by the people, for the people; whose just powers are derived from the consent of the governed, a democracy in a republic, a sovereign Nation of many sovereign States; a perfect union, one and inseparable; established upon those principles of freedom, equality, justice, and humanity for which American patriots sacrificed their lives and fortunes. I therefore believe it is my duty to my country to love it, to support its Constitution, to obey its laws, to respect its flag, and to defend it against all enemies.

Offline Fourwinds

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1278
  • Reputation: +131/-9
Re: Clinton vs. Bush on Iran
« Reply #4 on: July 14, 2015, 09:01:06 PM »
Jeb is a RINO without a doubt. I still don't like him, and I sure as heck will NO vote for him, but his assessment of the "deal" is correct.

So I'm curious, did he come up with the assessment on his own? Or did his wife come up with it? Wait..no I think she just lays out his immigration policy  :lmao:

Offline libertybele

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 639
  • Reputation: +50/-21
Re: Clinton vs. Bush on Iran
« Reply #5 on: July 14, 2015, 09:22:33 PM »
So I'm curious, did he come up with the assessment on his own? Or did his wife come up with it? Wait..no I think she just lays out his immigration policy  :lmao:

Hi 5    :cheersmate:   Obviously she wears the pants in the family.
I believe in the United States of America as a government of the people, by the people, for the people; whose just powers are derived from the consent of the governed, a democracy in a republic, a sovereign Nation of many sovereign States; a perfect union, one and inseparable; established upon those principles of freedom, equality, justice, and humanity for which American patriots sacrificed their lives and fortunes. I therefore believe it is my duty to my country to love it, to support its Constitution, to obey its laws, to respect its flag, and to defend it against all enemies.

Offline RayRaytheSBS

  • "There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men."
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1195
  • Reputation: +200/-13
Re: Clinton vs. Bush on Iran
« Reply #6 on: July 15, 2015, 02:10:59 AM »
WTF? What kind of cocksucking agreement is this if Obama gets the final say either way, and congress has no say in the matter?

Rule by Imperial Fiat of his highnessless king Barky I 'teh incompetent'
“Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor, and the contrary opinion is wishful thinking at its worst. Breeds that forget this basic truth have always paid for it with their lives and their freedoms”

“The best things in life are beyond money; their price is agony and sweat and devotion ... and the price demanded for the most precious of all things in life is life itself - ultimate cost for perfect value.”
― Robert A. Heinlein, Starship Troopers

Offline txradioguy

  • Minister of Propaganda
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18686
  • Reputation: +1292/-1116
  • Rule 39
Re: Clinton vs. Bush on Iran
« Reply #7 on: July 15, 2015, 06:10:03 AM »
WTF? What kind of cocksucking agreement is this if Obama gets the final say either way, and congress has no say in the matter?

Wait until what's left of our European allies see what we've done to them with this agreement.
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Creator of the largest Fight Club thread ever!

http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=83285.0