« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Nads and the First Ammendment  (Read 2577 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online CC27

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6336
  • Reputation: +1832/-30
Nads and the First Ammendment
« on: May 04, 2015, 11:47:49 AM »
Quote
nadinbrzezinski (136,316 posts)

First Ammendment


Here it comes again. We have folks who believe it is absolute, (no, it is not), and those who believe what happened in Texas was incitement by "line the usual suspects" (in this case Geller). Incitement is actually one of the judicial tests used by the courts to limit free speech. It is also used as part of hate crime investigations, where speech is gathered and added to the evidence list. Why? Well incitement.

There is a whole slew of supreme court cases where speech has been limited in certain, very narrow circumstances. It is indeed an area of specialty in the law, and one where there is a lot of disagreement as well. Your test, for all of you on the incitement side, is not convincing people on a website, but convincing the courts. Two people are dead. There was an attempt to attack a show. Those are the facts. Whether you can pass the incitement test that a third person not part of that particular conspiracy is part of this, good luck with that one.

Here you will have many people going yup, yup, yup, and others going, you either believe in \or not.


Suffice it to say it is always entertaining, but you still cannot scream fire in a crowded theater. (unless, as legend has it, after a kid asked the justices about that... the Justice acknowledged that it was ok to scream fire in a crowed theater that was actually on fire.)

Now back to work with me. I just read the threads and shook my head.

She has a new word. Yup.  :whatever:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026617788
Logged

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: Nads and the First Ammendment
« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2015, 11:58:28 AM »


"yup yup yup yup"
Logged
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline Skul

  • Sometimes I drink water just to surprise my liver
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12475
  • Reputation: +914/-179
  • Chief of the cathouse
Re: Nads and the First Ammendment
« Reply #2 on: May 04, 2015, 01:08:34 PM »
 :rotf: :lmao:   :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:   :cheersmate:

Leave it to the foreign born, foreign raised, foreign " educated", crazy, bald, rotund, dwarf, to interpret our Constitution for us.
Suffice it to say, shut yer pie hole, gNads.
Logged
Then-Chief Justice John Marshall observed, “Between a balanced republic and a democracy, the difference is like that between order and chaos.”

John Adams warned in a letter, “Remember democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet, that did not commit suicide.”

Offline FlippyDoo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2544
  • Reputation: +1310/-14
  • Your president, too.
Re: Nads and the First Ammendment
« Reply #3 on: May 04, 2015, 01:09:09 PM »
Quote from: CC27 on May 04, 2015, 11:47:49 AM
She has a new word. Yup.  :whatever:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026617788

Actually "yup" is fairly common in the nadinese, but I do believe this is the first time it's ever been used in triplicate.
Logged
Fictional spirit-guiding by appointment.
conservativecave.com & conservativeunderground.com

For new members and lurkers: I am a fictional spirit-guide with no smell whatsoever. I am part irish setter and part pigeon. If you don't smell any strange smells it means I'm probably standing next to you. As I am a fictional character anything I post should possibly be considered fictional.

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 30207
  • Reputation: +3418/-248
Re: Nads and the First Ammendment
« Reply #4 on: May 04, 2015, 01:19:28 PM »
Ummmmmm ... yeah. [Sarcasm] Back in the bad old days of Reagan I took a Business Law class at a local JC. The prof was a practicing attorney and a judge pro-tem (basically like a substitute teacher, only for judges). IOW, not an idiot. The saying he taught was that, "Mere words do not justify an assault."

Whether Gellar's gathering is protected free speech is one matter. The wrong-headed idea that it is a provocation that justified assaulting a security guard is quite another. It doesn't.

But let's play with nads' "legal theory" a bit. That moron who put a crucifix in a bottle of urine was clearly "inciting" Catholics, if not Christians generally. Would that "incitement" have justified a bunch of Catholics shooting up the museum that displayed it? No. And they didn't.

The movie, "The Last Temptation of the Christ" was clearly intended as an "incitement" of Christians. Would Christians, therefore, have been justified in shooting up theaters that showed it? Again, no. And again, they didn't.

Nads' is the kind of "reasoning" that comes out of blinding hatred. "Reasoning" that can't withstand 30 seconds of thought by very ordinary people.
Logged
If The Vaccine is deadly as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, millions now living would have died.

Offline Rebel

  • MAGA
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16934
  • Reputation: +1384/-215
Re: Nads and the First Ammendment
« Reply #5 on: May 04, 2015, 02:13:11 PM »
Quote
nadinbrzezinski (136,329 posts)

And please do not put words into my mouth and tell me what I think, I think it is so illegal that I ran Charlie Hebdo cartoons on a very local paper.

When did it go to print?
Logged
NAMBLA is a left-wing organization.

Quote
There's a reason why patriotism is considered a conservative value. Watch a Tea Party rally and you'll see people proudly raising the American flag and showing pride in U.S. heroes such as Thomas Jefferson. Watch an OWS rally and you'll see people burning the American flag while showing pride in communist heroes such as Che Guevera. --Bob, from some news site

Offline GOBUCKS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24186
  • Reputation: +1812/-339
  • All in all, not bad, not bad at all
Re: Nads and the First Ammendment
« Reply #6 on: May 04, 2015, 02:13:58 PM »
Quote
Mon May 4, 2015, 12:39 PM
nadinbrzezinski (136,329 posts)

I am making a legal argument, one that you actually missed I think.

Once again, nadin's wisdom went right over their heads.
Logged

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Re: Nads and the First Ammendment
« Reply #7 on: May 04, 2015, 02:30:24 PM »
According to the DUmmie theory of incitement to violence, every cop would be kind of justified in shooting or at least beating the crap out of someone wearing one of these.

Logged

Offline Rebel

  • MAGA
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16934
  • Reputation: +1384/-215
Re: Nads and the First Ammendment
« Reply #8 on: May 04, 2015, 02:42:54 PM »
Quote from: GOBUCKS on May 04, 2015, 02:13:58 PM
Once again, nadin's wisdom went right over their heads.

She wishes she didn't know all this shit.
Logged
NAMBLA is a left-wing organization.

Quote
There's a reason why patriotism is considered a conservative value. Watch a Tea Party rally and you'll see people proudly raising the American flag and showing pride in U.S. heroes such as Thomas Jefferson. Watch an OWS rally and you'll see people burning the American flag while showing pride in communist heroes such as Che Guevera. --Bob, from some news site

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: Nads and the First Ammendment
« Reply #9 on: May 04, 2015, 02:50:00 PM »
Quote from: thundley4 on May 04, 2015, 02:30:24 PM
According to the DUmmie theory of incitement to violence, every cop would be kind of justified in shooting or at least beating the crap out of someone wearing one of these.



"Reach out and touch someone."

Or

"Let your fingers do the talking."
Logged
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline Rebel

  • MAGA
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16934
  • Reputation: +1384/-215
Re: Nads and the First Ammendment
« Reply #10 on: May 04, 2015, 02:57:10 PM »
Progs need watering every now and then.


Logged
NAMBLA is a left-wing organization.

Quote
There's a reason why patriotism is considered a conservative value. Watch a Tea Party rally and you'll see people proudly raising the American flag and showing pride in U.S. heroes such as Thomas Jefferson. Watch an OWS rally and you'll see people burning the American flag while showing pride in communist heroes such as Che Guevera. --Bob, from some news site

Offline HawkHogan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1160
  • Reputation: +101/-24
Re: Nads and the First Ammendment
« Reply #11 on: May 04, 2015, 03:08:21 PM »
Nadin has no idea what she's talking about.

The incitement would have to be on the part of the speaker, which means Pam Geller would have to incite people at her free speech event to attack Muslims.

The best counter to "bad" free speech is more speech.

Classical liberals believed that paragon.  Modern liberals hate it.
Logged

Offline obumazombie

  • Siege engine to lib fortresses
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21814
  • Reputation: +1661/-578
  • Last of the great minorities
Re: Nads and the First Ammendment
« Reply #12 on: May 04, 2015, 03:42:16 PM »
Yup yup yup is just shorthand for cousin nadin convincing herself.
Logged
There were only two options for gender. At last count there are at least 12, according to libs. By that standard, I'm a male lesbian.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »