Oh, look! Election fraud.

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

School board election in NY. Torn up ballots found in the trash. Likely ballot forgery.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKaQODK9veg

[ADsOutburst]

But I was told by Democrats that voter fraud doesn't exist is only done by Republicans.

[SVPete]

Let me guess. The torn up ballots were votes against the union shill-candidate(s).

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

Alabama Case Spotlights Reality of Noncitizens Voting in U.S. Elections

...

A case in Alabama has become an example some Republicans spotlight to show how, despite existing voting laws, some noncitizens have been able to participate in elections.

The battle played out in Alabama over several years when Alabama Secretary of State Wes Allen identified 3,251 individuals in 2023 who were registered to vote in Alabama and had been issued noncitizen identification numbers by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). At the time, Allen said he was repeatedly denied help from the Biden administration. He also noted at the time it was possible for some of the individuals to have become naturalized citizens who are eligible to vote, and said the Secretary of State’s Office would allow them to update their information and participate in the civil process.

His efforts to clean up the voter rolls were blocked in court during the Biden administration, but under President Donald Trump, Allen was able to have 186 noncitizens who were registered to vote removed from the state’s voter file in January 2026. Allen partnered with the federal government to gain access to the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program, which is a program used to identify noncitizens registered to vote in different states. That program was also blocked by a federal judge in June.

emphasis added

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/07/07/alabama-case-spotlights-reality-noncitizens-voting-u-s-elections/

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

James O'Keefe disguised himself as a homeless person and observed cash-for-petition signatures:

https://youtu.be/ulDarNrb4iI?si=2BddEOUKfn1YS02_

[DefiantSix]

James O'Keefe disguised himself as a homeless person and observed cash-for-petition signatures:

https://youtu.be/ulDarNrb4iI?si=2BddEOUKfn1YS02_

[Ralph Wiggum]

Although they have already reached DEFCON-1 levels of bat-shit crazy, President Trump's prime time address tonight is going to make the leftists/media go bonkers. He's apparently going to speak at length about election interference, which really triggers the nutjob left. I look forward to it.

[DefiantSix]

Although they have already reached DEFCON-1 levels of bat-shit crazy, President Trump's prime time address tonight is going to make the leftists/media go bonkers. He's apparently going to speak at length about election interference, which really triggers the nutjob left. I look forward to it.

Leftist head a'splodin' time will be when he starts laying down line by line EVIDENCE (that will be usable in trials, doncha know) of the pattern of Dim'Rat election fraud, and WHO has been orchestrating it for them (Lookin' at YOU, CCP...) 

 

[Ralph Wiggum]

Leftist head a'splodin' time will be when he starts laying down line by line EVIDENCE (that will be usable in trials, doncha know) of the pattern of Dim'Rat election fraud, and WHO has been orchestrating it for them (Lookin' at YOU, CCP...) 

 

I'm willing to bet that the legacy Stasi media outlets WILL NOT cover this speech. For us who are interested (no baseball until tomorrow due to the All-Star break), the only TV places one will likely find the speech will be on Fox News, Newsmax, or online. Just my hunch.

[SVPete]

AOC has demanded that Alphabet Soup news not carry it. Dems and their MSM-shills still have not absorbed the simple fact that Alphabet Soupers lost their monopoly on skews decades ago. On satellite, Salem News Network will be carrying it.

[Ralph Wiggum]

AOC has demanded that Alphabet Soup news not carry it. Dems and their MSM-shills still have not absorbed the simple fact that Alphabet Soupers lost their monopoly on skews decades ago. On satellite, Salem News Network will be carrying it.

Hadn't heard that, but that seems like the attitude of the left is going to be. They really hate free speech, don't they?

[DefiantSix]

Hadn't heard that, but that seems like the attitude of the left is going to be. They really hate free speech, don't they?

Unless it's marching in metronomic ideological lockstep with them, yep...

[ADsOutburst]

AOC has demanded that Alphabet Soup news not carry it. Dems and their MSM-shills still have not absorbed the simple fact that Alphabet Soupers lost their monopoly on skews decades ago. On satellite, Salem News Network will be carrying it.

And that's why (or a reason) why the prospect of Democrats regaining power should scare everyone.

[SVPete]

U.S. networks face dilemma over whether to air Trump’s election security speech

https://srnnews.com/u-s-networks-face-dilemma-over-whether-to-air-trumps-election-security-speech/

NEW YORK, July 16 (Reuters) – U.S. television networks are weighing whether to carry a planned primetime address on Thursday by President Donald Trump, who is expected to focus his remarks on election security, four months before critical midterm elections.

Networks have historically carried most such speeches on the grounds that they provide information of public importance.

The White House is considering using the speech to disclose sensitive intelligence related to China’s intention or ability to interfere in the 2020 U.S. election, Reuters reported on Wednesday, which some Trump officials worry could be misleading.
...
Some Democrats, including U.S. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, have urged networks not to air the speech, arguing Trump is likely to repeat debunked claims.

Spokespeople for the three major U.S. networks — ABC, CBS and NBC — did not respond to Reuters questions about whether they planned to carry the address live. CNN and Fox News also did not respond to a request for comment.

WRT "Networks have historically carried most such speeches" that began to change in the 1980s when anti-Reagan skews manglers at the networks realized that Reagan was an effective and persuavive communicator whose speeches bypassed and countered their biased skews reports.

[Ralph Wiggum]

U.S. networks face dilemma over whether to air Trump’s election security speech

https://srnnews.com/u-s-networks-face-dilemma-over-whether-to-air-trumps-election-security-speech/

WRT "Networks have historically carried most such speeches" that began to change in the 1980s when anti-Reagan skews manglers at the networks realized that Reagan was an effective and persuavive communicator whose speeches bypassed and countered their biased skews reports.

I'm telling ya', CNN and MS13-NOW will NOT cover, and if they do, they'll have Fake Yapper on CNN continually interrupting and/or cutting away. MadCow & Hayes on MS13-NOW will simply yack about how deranged the President is. The major over-the-air networks might be forced begrudgingly to cover it.

[DefiantSix]

I'm telling ya', CNN and MS13-NOW will NOT cover, and if they do, they'll have Fake Yapper on CNN continually interrupting and/or cutting away. MadCow & Hayes on MS13-NOW will simply yack about how deranged the President is. The major over-the-air networks might be forced begrudgingly to cover it.

What are the odds they cut away for 5 minutes of Geritol, Ensure, Medicare Part C/D supplements and Viagra commercials after every 2 minutes of the President's address?

Just casually asking, you understand... 

[Ralph Wiggum]

What are the odds they cut away for 5 minutes of Geritol, Ensure, Medicare Part C/D supplements and Viagra commercials after every 2 minutes of the President's address?

Just casually asking, you understand... 

You forgot Balance of Nature and Relaxium!

[ADsOutburst]

I'm telling ya', CNN and MS13-NOW will NOT cover, and if they do, they'll have Fake Yapper on CNN continually interrupting and/or cutting away. MadCow & Hayes on MS13-NOW will simply yack about how deranged the President is. The major over-the-air networks might be forced begrudgingly to cover it.

Watch them not cover it, then turn around and say something like "Now we're going to fact-check the President's speech".

[Ralph Wiggum]

As predicted by yours truly:

New: Trump's Primetime Speech Snubbed by NBC and ABC

President Donald Trump is delivering a major speech this evening. These are generally considered events worth covering (and stay tuned, because we'll be covering it here at RedState) and, out of respect for the office, if nothing else, the major media, legacy and new, should do the president the courtesy of covering the event.

I mean, the legacy media covered (and covered up) Joe Biden's adventures down Dementia Lane as well as Kamala Harris's eyebrow-furrowing word salads, after all.

Apparently, it's not that way anymore. Two major legacy media outlets, ABC and NBC, are giving the president the cold shoulder.

The New York Times chimed in as well.

Neither ABC nor NBC is planning to pre-empt regularly scheduled entertainment programming at 9 p.m. when Mr. Trump speaks. Fox News, which airs “Hannity” during that time slot, has not said if it will broadcast the president’s address.

CBS, CNN and MS NOW did not respond to inquiries about their programming plans for Thursday evening.

I'd make a guess, but... I'd be more than a bit surprised if Fox doesn't cover the speech, but CBS, CNN and MS NOW, well, I'd be even more surprised if they don't follow NBC and CBS's rather spiteful example.

The uncertainty is a direct result of the potential for Mr. Trump’s speech to become partisan or incendiary. The president is expected to raise the specter of voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election, according to people familiar with his plans. Mr. Trump has said his address will concern election security, and that he has “really, really big news” to share.

If Mr. Trump makes unsubstantiated allegations of election rigging, network executives will need to decide whether to ask their anchors to break in and fact-check the president’s remarks, or wait until he is finished speaking to provide context.

Oh please. Like, no Democrat president ever made an unsubstantiated allegation? Besides, this reporting should be coverage, not analysis; do the analysis and commentary after the fact.

Let's face it, the treatment of President Trump by the legacy media has been shameful from the word go. From uneven coverage during campaigns to debate moderators openly challenging Mr. Trump's remarks, the legacy media have been clowning themselves at every turn.

But this isn't about the treatment of Donald John Trump, the man. This is about some elementary respect for the office of the President of the United States, no matter who sits in that chair. The major networks owe it to their viewers to present the president's remarks and let them, the voters, make up their own minds about what he said. The networks can bring out their talking heads after the president is finished. That's fine. That's how it's normally done.

But nothing about the legacy media's treatment of President Trump has been anything like how it's normally done.

https://redstate.com/wardclark/2026/07/16/new-trump-primetime-speech-snubbed-by-nbc-and-abc-n2204414