Mainstream Media Ignores An Explosive Charge In Trump’s Speechhttps://issuesinsights.com/2026/07/17/mainstream-media-ignores-an-explosive-charge-in-trumps-speech/Might the reader be wondering whether the across-the-board Trump Deranged Syndrome-tinged legacy media response to The Donald’s Thursday night primetime address on election integrity reflected a predetermined and even pre-researched-and-written narrative?
Wonder no more: the Reuters headline replayed above gave away the game, as it was posted more than an hour before the speech.
And the “rapid response” to the orations was, one might observe, preternaturally rapid and responsive.
...
the legacy media clearly came loaded for bear — ready to shoot down just about each and every point the president raised on his main issue.
Except one — regarding which the collective commentariat, based on your correspondent’s own rapid review, appeared to suffering from “a deplorable lack of curiosity,” as the fictionalized version of Captain Von Trapp phrased it in a film classic.
And that would be the president’s assertion that:
“The Chinese government sought to identify U.S. journalists who had reported negatively on the U.S. president and pay them large sums of money to write more negative articles about him, as many as they could, and they didn’t care what they said.”
When a dog doesn't bark, it means the dog knows the person/thing. MSM silence suggests some in the MSM know the claim is true and fear that Trump has the evidence to squash denials. Further, while I doubt it would fall within any legal definition of treason, any "journalist" who accepted Chinese $$ needs to be exposed, prosecuted as an unregistered agent of a foreign nation, and shamed into barista or fryolator training. Given 11 years of MSM Trump-Hatred, the chances of the latter would not be high.
