This one should have expected the lock that he/she got. The DUmmy made the mistake of saying the gNads has characterized her 'bullies' incorrectly, that what gNads considers bullying is actually requesting facts/more information.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024648805
sad-cafe (1,242 posts)
perfect example. There is no bullying NO BULLYING
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by hrmjustin (a host of the General Discussion forum).
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024646081
The OP started a post against E=Cigs or Vapors.
Stated a bunch of crap she knew were facts and when asked for proof of those facts, one was a simple picture to back up a pretty ludicrous claim that they were being targeted for 4th graders. When no such picture could be produced, instead of saying that, the OP locked the post claiming bullying.
This is not bullying...this is asking for facts -for proof That is ALL
Interestingly, the host who locked the thread is one of gNads' sycophants who regularly comes to her defense. Imagine that!
The post that sadcafe refers to is another one of gNads' screeds about Ecigs, and is a huge bonfire. There was so much piling on that gNads self deleted it, but in the announcement that it would be self deleted, she posted the entire OP. Here is the OP link
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024646081
Here's the 'good bye' post, which contains the deleted OP
nadinbrzezinski (131,147 posts)
228. Since personal attacks is all that is left here, self locked, with the content of the OP
On E-Cigs, after sitting through a brief from County Staff
and testimony from those at the American Heart, American Cancer and Lung Association, as well as other groups... my vote is for them to be fully regulated as tobacco products., and treated as such.
I also learned today that they're insidious among minors, the product (the devices themselves) can and are used to TCH delivery as well as crack cocaine. And that my thinking that it was a good quitting device, is actually anecdotal. Hell, some of these now are marketed with Angry Birds packaging on them.
Since I do not expect this to be popular. I am willing to make a bet here though. More and more bans will come and sooner or later E-Cig adverts will also disappear from my TV. (Which is good, NoJoy, or whatever that brand is, is not cool)
Now where did I leave my notes, recording and of course my lovely photos? Oh yeah, in the bag... sorry.
Oh and don't expect me to post the story here as to what the County Board of Supervisors voted for today either or future actions. Just saying that listening to people with actual credentials, leads me to believe that indeed, they shoudl be treated like cig. I guess this has the potential of actually making it to CNN... potential, that is all.
It's a large bonfire. But, gNads, not being able to leave well enough alone started another bonfire about Ecigs. That one was brought over in this thread
http://www.conservativecave.com/index.php/topic,95205.0.html
