Author Topic: sparkling husband primitive dreams on  (Read 1016 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3096/-173
sparkling husband primitive dreams on
« on: June 22, 2008, 09:04:45 PM »
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3502929

Oh my.

Quote
Husb2Sparkly  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Sun Jun-22-08 09:45 PM
Original message

So, we get the White House, a bigger House majority, and 59 Senate seats ........
   
..... and defeated (McCain) veep candidate Joe Lieberman comes back to the Senate. He ran as a 'unity' partner with nutball McCain and never changed his registration to Repubican ...........

..... what do we do?

I say "**** 'em" .... caucus with your dick, you piece of shit.

But that's just me.

Do we allow him in to get our super majority?

You know, the fantasy on Skins's island has been more fantastical than ever, it seems.

Quote
JerseygirlCT  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Sun Jun-22-08 09:46 PM
Response to Original message

1. He wouldn't vote with us anyway.
   
He would attempt to hold us hostage to his ego, however.

Screw him.

Quote
Vincardog  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Sun Jun-22-08 09:47 PM
Response to Original message

2. No ****ing way. LIEberbunny can go masturbate in private with his rePIGlicken friends

Quote
bluerum  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Sun Jun-22-08 09:50 PM
Response to Original message

3. Run him out on a rail.

Quote
notesdev  (614 posts) Sun Jun-22-08 09:51 PM
Response to Original message

4. 60 seats only means something...
   
... if you can line up all 60 votes when the chips are down.

Not a prayer in hell, IMO. Too much bribe money floating out there for 60 Senators to act in unison and integrity on a matter of importance.

Quote
sabbat hunter  (1000+ posts) Sun Jun-22-08 09:52 PM
Response to Original message

5. it won't mean anything
   
if we have 59 people caucusing with the democrats in the senate to have a 60th that really won't be supporting us. So say adios to Lieberman and let him go caucus on his own or with the repubs.

Quote
gristy  (1000+ posts) Sun Jun-22-08 09:52 PM
Response to Original message

6. With Lieberman you would have a super-majority only in theory
   
And it would be a theory that would quickly be dis-proven. Even if we have 60 Dems in the Senate without Lieberman, it would not be a particularly powerful super-majority. Herding cats and all that...

Quote
Olney Blue  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Sun Jun-22-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message

7. I heard Harry Reid say how much they have to depend on him for important votes. It must be hard to keep up the pretenses of civility after all he has done.

You know, franksolich had another one of those dreams, about Barry "Goldwater" Obama, the Obamaites, the Obamaites betrayed, including a whole cast of characters such as my fellow alum Skins and the senior U.S. Senator from Connecticut, but he'll wait until the forum needs a "filler" before publishing it.

It was a great dream.  All-star cast of characters.  Obamaite primitives betrayed.
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline DixieBelle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12143
  • Reputation: +512/-49
  • Still looking for my pony.....
Re: sparkling husband primitive dreams on
« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2008, 09:17:41 PM »
Wow. The sparkling one must really tighten that leash on a regular basis. He's unglued again.
I can see November 2 from my house!!!

Spread my work ethic, not my wealth.

Forget change, bring back common sense.
-------------------------------------------------

No, my friends, there’s only one really progressive idea. And that is the idea of legally limiting the power of the government. That one genuinely liberal, genuinely progressive idea — the Why in 1776, the How in 1787 — is what needs to be conserved. We need to conserve that fundamentally liberal idea. That is why we are conservatives. --Bill Whittle

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1707/-151
Re: sparkling husband primitive dreams on
« Reply #2 on: June 23, 2008, 04:38:31 PM »
Quote
Olney Blue  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Sun Jun-22-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message

7. I heard Harry Reid say how much they have to depend on him for important votes. It must be hard to keep up the pretenses of civility after all he has done.

Yes, I'm sure it's quite difficult for Joe to bite his tongue at those times.

 :evillaugh:
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline InfamousAndy

  • Just Off Probation
  • *
  • Posts: 104
  • Reputation: +14/-5
  • The Friendly Christian
Re: sparkling husband primitive dreams on
« Reply #3 on: June 23, 2008, 07:52:46 PM »
I see it the otherway.  Lieberman has shown incredible class to deal with a party that essentially campaigned against him while he was a member (and incumbent!)