George Zimmerman is a 'law abiding gun owner'

[Freeper]

Star Member geek tragedy (27,956 posts)

George Zimmerman is a 'law abiding gun owner'


 
Last edited Sun Jul 14, 2013, 01:16 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)


Legally declared so by the state of Florida.

Which just shows that 'law abiding gun owners' are a menace to public safety just as much as officially criminal ones.

To our friends on the Gungeon: may you be surrounded by law abiding gun owners such as Zimmerman. Leave your skittles at home.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023255008

Yeah because only crazy nutjobs would defend themselves when someone is pounding their head into the pavement.
If Saint Skittles had been beating on any of these DUmmies they would have been begging anyone with a gun to come save them.

Star Member PDJane (9,055 posts)
1. Which is the reason I believe in gun control. Period.

If we had the gun control that you want. Saint Skittles probably would have killed the creepy ass cracker.

Star Member Hoyt (12,812 posts)
3. Yep, in gun culture's view, Zman is just another law-abiding, responsible gun owner.


He might even be a martyr like Randy Weaver or something.

Weaver was set up.

[Big Dog]

Star Member geek tragedy (27,956 posts)

George Zimmerman is a 'law abiding gun owner'

Yes, he is.

And as such, he is legally permitted to continue to carry a concealed weapon for his own protection and that of his family.

[Freeper]

Yes, he is.

And as such, he is legally permitted to continue to carry a concealed weapon for his own protection and that of his family.

He is going to need it too.

You know the first 0bama son that finds him will try something.

[marv]

Gun control works really, really well in Chicago.

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

And Trayvon Martin was another wannbe ghetto rat bred on liberal rejectionism who attacked an innocent man and learned the hard way.


The law performed exactly as it was designed to do.

[Tucker]

He is going to need it too.

You know the first 0bama son that finds him will try something.

He needs to get rid of that Kel-Tec.

[jukin]

Yep he was. he used his weapon when it was absolutely necessary to save his life from a bigger, stronger, and more aggresive person attacking him with the intent to cause deadly harm.

I have to agree with the DUchebag.

Like I have said the stories and theories are going to be getting crazier and crazier as the days pass form the righteous verdict of not guilty due to self defense. Still no outrage over the 2-3000 black men, women and kids killed by blacks in Chicago since George was falsely accused of 2nd degree murder.

Like saying the word ******, only blacks can kill blacks and get away with it with the approval of white elitist liberals....and really dumb ass crackers like the DUchebags.

[Rebel]

Hey, lurking DUmbasses, if he was, as you say, a "racist" hellbent on killing a black boy, he'd have done it well before he was on his damn back getting his head beat into the damn concrete, you morons.

[Tucker]

Hey, lurking DUmbasses, if he was, as you say, a "racist" hellbent on killing a black boy, he'd have done it well before he was on his damn back getting his head beat into the damn concrete, you morons.

Many have said that he smashed his own head into the sidewalk after he shot the thug. They actually believe that.

[diesel driver]

Many have said that he smashed his own head into the sidewalk after he shot the thug. They actually believe that.

DUmmies believe in Bigfoot (the beast, not the truck) and the moon is made of green cheese, too.   

[I_B_Perky]

Star Member geek tragedy (27,956 posts)
George Zimmerman is a 'law abiding gun owner'
Legally declared so by the state of Florida.

Which just shows that 'law abiding gun owners' are a menace to public safety just as much as officially criminal ones.

To our friends on the Gungeon: may you be surrounded by law abiding gun owners such as Zimmerman. Leave your skittles at home.

He was acquitted. By a jury of his peers. In a court of law. Legally he can carry on like he did before the trial. Why do you have a problem with it dummie?

As for the skittles comments... well dummie, most legal gun owners don't go round attacking people whether they have skittles on their person or not. If Skittlekid would have just gone to daddy's home instead of ambushing an armed man, he would still be alive today to serve out his inevitable future felony sentence for drugs.

Sucks to be him. Sorry he brought skittles to a gun fight. He chose poorly. He thought he was a billy bad ass. He was wrong. Now he is worm food.

There is a lesson in there somewhere.

[Airwolf]

Someone on the left needs to explain why Saint Skittles was legally entitled to attack Zimmerman . So far as I know there is no law in any State or American territory that says that because someone is following you that you can jump them,take a swing at them,pound their head into concrete or do anything but continue on to wherever you are going. Also as was mentioned elsewhere here on CC,Why was Zimmerman legally bound to follow the dispatchers command to not follow Saint Skittles. Most dispatchers are not law enforcement and have no training as a law enforcement officer or are they to give legal advise over the phone or radio to civilians.

[GOBUCKS]

Someone on the left needs to explain why Saint Skittles was legally entitled to attack Zimmerman.

Easy. He was a creepy ass cracker who frightened an innocent li'l chile.

[Rebel]

Easy. He was a creepy ass cracker who frightened an innocent li'l chile No Limit Nigga.

Fixed.

[BlueStateSaint]

Someone on the left needs to explain why Saint Skittles was legally entitled to attack Zimmerman . So far as I know there is no law in any State or American territory that says that because someone is following you that you can jump them,take a swing at them,pound their head into concrete or do anything but continue on to wherever you are going. Also as was mentioned elsewhere here on CC,Why was Zimmerman legally bound to follow the dispatchers command to not follow Saint Skittles. Most dispatchers are not law enforcement and have no training as a law enforcement officer or are they to give legal advise over the phone or radio to civilians.

AW, the dispatcher, under cross-examination, admitted that 911 dispatchers have no legal authority to issue any command like that.

[Tucker]

AW, the dispatcher, under cross-examination, admitted that 911 dispatchers have no legal authority to issue any command like that.

It was pointed out that the actual statement was "You don't need to do that."  It was also covered that because of possible law suits, that they cannot give directives.

[Airwolf]

AW, the dispatcher, under cross-examination, admitted that 911 dispatchers have no legal authority to issue any command like that.

We all know that but for some reason no one on the left does. Surprising that the FCBD named Gnads hasn't pointed that out after being in all those rescue missions as an EMT and a reporter and all.

[DLR Pyro]

Hey, lurking DUmbasses, if he was, as you say, a "racist" hellbent on killing a black boy, he'd have done it well before he was on his damn back getting his head beat into the damn concrete, you morons.

and to add onto that sentiment, he would not have called for police assistance if he was hellbent on killing a black boy.

[Aristotelian]

I don't see any doubt as to Mr Zimmerman being a gun-owner (in his position he'd be utterly insane not to be) - so the DUmmy astonishment is to his being "law-abiding". The problem is that for him not to be law-abiding, he would had to have broken a law; in a society of laws (such as the United States are) the breaking of laws is determined by courts - the court ruled that he has not broken a law, and therefore it follows that he is law-abiding.

I realise that this simple logic doesn't rise to the higher level reasoning of 2+2=potatoe, but that's just how it is.

[GOBUCKS]

And Trayvon Martin was another wannbe ghetto rat bred on liberal rejectionism who attacked an innocent man and learned the hard way.


The law performed exactly as it was designed to do.

And this was a perfect example of what concealed carry is meant to accomplish.

A man was jumped by a hoodrat in the dark, and defended himself.

[jtyangel]

Someone on the left needs to explain why Saint Skittles was legally entitled to attack Zimmerman . So far as I know there is no law in any State or American territory that says that because someone is following you that you can jump them,take a swing at them,pound their head into concrete or do anything but continue on to wherever you are going. Also as was mentioned elsewhere here on CC,Why was Zimmerman legally bound to follow the dispatchers command to not follow Saint Skittles. Most dispatchers are not law enforcement and have no training as a law enforcement officer or are they to give legal advise over the phone or radio to civilians.

Yeah I've wondered to myself the same question. On a few of the talk circuits the best answer you will get is that this is part o a larger culture that thinks getting 'dissed' warrants attacking someone else and they must take their ass beating lying down for their dishonor. There is a double standard that they(low information voter of all ethnicities) are unwilling to resolve. Once you understand the mindset you start to crack the thought process of the idiots. You are sadly dealing with cultural norms that they believe trump legal norms.