Should my fellow alum Skins allocate campfires that the primitives light, so that Skins's island doesn't get all lopsided over only one or two issues?
It seems as if lately, Skins's island has been dominated, totally dominated, by primitves raging fastly and furiously against Massa Barry's proposed reforms of social security.
The problem there being, due to the narcissism of the primitives, they can't just comment at other primitives' campfires; they have to light their own.
And so not only is General Discussion dominated by a single issue, it's congested with what are pretty much duplicate threads saying the same thing as all the others.
Variety's the spice of life; the greater the array of choices of campfires, the better, for both the primitives and decent and civilized people observing the primitives.
Decent and civilized people do a great job at moderating their behavior; as one can see from conservativecave, this site's rarely, if ever, been dominated by one single issue, not even the presidential elections. There's always been a variety of issues to discuss, to suit any and every taste.
But primitives have no self-control, no ego-control, and need regulated.
When the primitives start getting out of hand, such as they are with this really boring social security issue, ignoring issues of substance and importance, I think it's time for Skins to jump in, and ration out the number of campfires that can be lit about a particular issue--like, say, in this case, no more than 15% of campfires on Skins's island can discuss Massa Barry's overhaul of social security.
This way, the issues the primitives wish to discuss would be more diverse.